dark light

snake65

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 616 through 630 (of 746 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Kuznetsov vs Vikramaditya #2054883
    snake65
    Participant

    According to ARMS-TASS agency, Baltiyski Zavod has finished production of boilers for Vikram. The boilers are upgraded KVG-3D type, working on Diesel fuel. Anti-corrosion treated steel is used for tubes as well as non-asbest isolation.

    in reply to: P17 and P17A #2056385
    snake65
    Participant

    Russian MilParade magazine anounced in February, 2006, that Russia has produced a 3S-14E launcher, to be installed on P-17.

    in reply to: the russian typoon class sub #2057545
    snake65
    Participant

    “And now Nelson you are going to say that this is a picture of a pool somewhere else (videocaption from TV coverage on Severostal mentioned by dnjik)”

    Do you see how the water is bubbling??? How many swimming pools have you been in where the water bubbles?? Maybe this Ruskie has terrible gas or more likely he is not in a swimming pool but a hot tub! A person is also able to swim laps in a swimming pool. The most anyone could do in this hot tub is chase their **** like my dog does!

    OK, OK, it’s a hot tub, bcause it’s in a Russian sub. If that was a US sub it would have been called a pool. I got Your point. By the way, ever been to sauna? Nobody cares for hot tub after sitting in 120 Celsius hot compartment. It’s just a basin with cold water to get cooled after sauna.

    in reply to: Kuznetsov vs Vikramaditya #2057549
    snake65
    Participant

    Hi guys.

    I was fooling around with photoshop this morning, and decided to try to sketch how large the Kuznetsov/Varjag hangar realy is. Using Gollevainen’s measurements (153 x 26), it turned out something like this:

    http://img88.imageshack.us/img88/4824/admiralkuznetsovhangarsize5jd.jpg

    Judging from pics taken from the hangar, this seems to be more or less correct.

    What do you guys think?

    Oh, and do anyone have a better profile drawing/blueprint of Kuznetsov/Varjag?

    I guess this is the most accurate picture available

    in reply to: the russian typoon class sub #2058370
    snake65
    Participant

    And now Nelson you are going to say that this is a picture of a pool somewhere else :p (videocaption from TV coverage on Severostal mentioned by dnjik)

    in reply to: Goodbye Sea Harrier We will miss ye #2061173
    snake65
    Participant

    That’s really sad and nostalgic day. There’s F-35 in the future of course, but that’s diff story

    in reply to: Russian Navy : News & Discussion #2064158
    snake65
    Participant

    On the project 971 submarine sail, on the starboard side just below the cockpit, I see a swing out device when the boats are on the surface. What is the purpose??

    Do You have a photo with it in the open position?

    in reply to: Russian Navy : News & Discussion #2597073
    snake65
    Participant

    On the project 971 submarine sail, on the starboard side just below the cockpit, I see a swing out device when the boats are on the surface. What is the purpose??

    Do You have a photo with it in the open position?

    in reply to: Alfa and Soviet underwater Bastian Strategy Cold War #2064722
    snake65
    Participant

    I would indeed expect the same, indeed the mentioned sonars do not provide 360° coverage, but they do have some overlay in arcs, which enhances your capability. Then comes the Alpha idea, do you have any clue how an Alpha captain would ever know where the blind arc of his opponent is??? The only way to do that is really knowing the heading of your opponent, something practically very difficult. You need your sonar for that, a tracking, but when an Alpha wants to track, he’ll have to slow down, have his sonar find the opponent at a decent range, with his crappy sonar, that is less likely than the opponent tracking him, then he would have to accellerate very rapidly, move to that proposed blind arc and then move closer? I don’t know how much experience you have with ships, but it’s quite unlikely that they could be capable of that without coming in dangerous collision courses. And that all without being heard?!
    So basically they would need the luck of being behind an American sub that is sailing at high speed. It can happen once, but it won’t happen that much.
    Alpha and agile? Haha, no sub is really agile, their rudders are in front of their propellor, an inherent cause for not being agile. The LA was the first sub capable of turning 180° within 4 times its own length.(as reference, even the most bulky merchant ship has to be capable of that, be it a 400m tanker or a 300m container vessel, surface warships can turn sometimes within their own length)
    So being Agile for an Alpha, I doubt it and if so, it would still have to bring him quite close.

    First, submariners are as famous storytellers as fishermen :p
    Second, no doubt You have heard of multiple facts of sub collisions during Col War era. What makes You think that sub captains will not use dangerous manouvering if they had to in order to trail an enemy sub?
    Who told You that Alpha’s Okean sonar suit was crappy? It was quite powerful and accurate in active mode and that was the mode to be most often by Alphas.
    Regarding the agility of Alphas I have only the word of Russian captains, it’s Your choice whether You believe them or not :dev2: According to them Alpha was more agile than LA. I don’t know at what speed LA had the turn rate You cited but Alpha was able to make a U turn in 42 seconds at full speed and it was able to go at full power in one minute after full stop.

    in reply to: Alfa and Soviet underwater Bastian Strategy Cold War #2064830
    snake65
    Participant

    Having a spherical bow sonar doesn’t mean that You have a 360 (or close to it) spatial coverage. The towed array also has nothing to do with ability to look over your shoulder. That’s the reason for having flanked arrays 😀 it compensates some of the blind ark on the sides, but still there’s blind zone even for the most advanced subs. Alpha captains claim it to be so agile and quick that it was able to get into the blind arch of enemy sub before torps were fired. Russian sources claim that one of Alphas is known for having tailed an Amer sub for 22 hours. The Amer captain was not able to shake her off until Alpha was recalled. I guess this was early eighties.

    in reply to: Alfa and Soviet underwater Bastian Strategy Cold War #2064852
    snake65
    Participant

    Exact maximum submerged speed for Projekt 661 Anchar (NATO designation Papa) was 44.7 knots. The damage was superficial and was repaired quickly, as nobody expected her to be so quick, her expected speed was around 38 knots.
    Come on Neptune, You have a nice bearing and fire solution only if Your sonar is facing the right way, remember it’s 1970’s we are talking about. Lira was meant to be “interceptor” like MiG-25, using Alfa together with Shkval was rather deadly combination, at least on paper. What the Soviet Union did not manage to do was to create underwater early warning system like SOSUS, the ones they had were limited just for approaches to their bases. Thus Liras lost their advantages as they were not meant to creep silently and acquire the target on their own but rather to rely on receiving bearings from other sources and then home in on the target before it can react.

    in reply to: Indian navy – news & discussion #2064853
    snake65
    Participant

    Many Russian ships have COGOG or COGAG powerplant including Pr.1135, 1134B, 1155, 1154, 1164.

    in reply to: Alfa and Soviet underwater Bastian Strategy Cold War #2065141
    snake65
    Participant

    The tactics for Alpha’s was “dash, stop and listen”. It’s pretty long hope to hit a sub at standstill with a torp which has been fired away quite a long time ago, because Alpha will hear it coming.

    in reply to: Russian Navy : News & Discussion #2065313
    snake65
    Participant

    The chamber is between the cockpit/bridge and the antenna array. That would place it roughly slightly forward of halfway along the sail. The outlines of the module are visible in photgraphs I have. I also have photographs of the module removed in close proximety.

    Here it is on 971 Gepard and 945 Kostroma

    in reply to: Russian Navy : News & Discussion #2601802
    snake65
    Participant

    The chamber is between the cockpit/bridge and the antenna array. That would place it roughly slightly forward of halfway along the sail. The outlines of the module are visible in photgraphs I have. I also have photographs of the module removed in close proximety.

    Here it is on 971 Gepard and 945 Kostroma

Viewing 15 posts - 616 through 630 (of 746 total)