…Re the appearance of service Arrows, the Mk.2 would’ve been the initial service variant, and would have looked very much like the Mk.1s, the main difference being slightly wider jet pipes for the Iroquois engines. Ultimately, no doubt, there would have been changes, probably including external stores (likely under the belly rather than on the wings) replacing the F-106-style pop-open weapons bay…the bay section possibly being remade for photo-recon or ELINT/ECM use. On the drawing board was a Mach 3 version which would probably have appeared in pre-production form around 1965 or so; as designed it featured “petal” intakes closely reminiscent of those on the Republic F-105 Thunderchief but quite a bit larger, and iirc an even bigger vertical fin. It gets called “Arrow 3”, but I’d guess there’d have been a mark or two in between, since such a big machine seems to invite modification for assorted roles beyond the long range interceptor job it was initially designed to do. It would have made a good tactical bomber (a la F-111 or TSR2) or spy plane (RA-5C or SR-71). All that is academic of course. Canadian though I am, even I recognize that we had bitten off more than we could chew with the Arrow program. The concurrent abandonment of the Iroquois engine, though, was an inexcusable gaffe at least equal to the abandonment of the C102 airliner several years earlier.
S.
Re the mooted Arrow revival as an F-35 alternative, yes, that actually got sufficiently far along that the proponent successfully enlisted the aid and influence of the former CF chief of staff to promote it in Ottawa! Of course it never came to anything, as didn’t the slightly less wild-eyed concept a number of years earlier to build a full-size flyable Arrow 2 replica as a commemorative/educational piece. The nearest we will see to an Arrow re-creation is probably the 100% scale mockup built for TAM/CASM at Downsview.
I like to maintain the fantasy that 25202, the test program “workhorse” until it suffered a gear collapse in late ’58, got spirited out of the plant aboard several trucks during the scrapping, crossing the US border at Niagara Falls instead of stopping at Hamilton, and thereafter was used by the USAF as a lead-in trainer for the SR-71…being scrapped at Groom Lake in 1966 when no longer needed…picture a matt black Arrow with red low-viz USAF markings…it’d have looked really, really mean…
S.
That “docudrama” was far more drama than docu…but still, it raised interest in the by-then-somewhat-forgotten achievement the Arrow represented. Interestingly the DVD release of “The Arrow” included among its extra features the 1979 CBC documentary “There Never Was An Arrow”, which genuinely was a historical piece; I bought the DVD for that alone, have never watched the drama itself other than when it was first broadcast on TV. There’s some nifty mockup and model work (instead of the CGI that would be exclusively used now), but the story is pretty bent out of shape, and the ending, with Jack Woodman soaring off to parts unknown with the Mk.2 (which never flew in real life), is quite the howler. Truth told the real story is much more dramatic and wrenching. The approximately 80%-scale Arrow mockup completed for the drama is now in a museum in Alberta; a 100% scale mockup is stored in Toronto awaiting the planned revival of the former Downsview museum in a new location. Like TSR2, the CF-105 was absolutely huge…ten feet longer than the Lancasters built in the same plant not that many years before.
The British broadcast date of “The Arrow” concedes with the 55th anniversary of the cancellation of the Arrow program; surely that isn’t a coincidence…someone doing scheduling for this UK network has been doing his or her homework!
Many bits from Arrows survive in sometimes surprising locations, the biggest being with CA&SM (nee CAvM) in Ottawa, being a Mk.2 nose, one each nose and main gear, an Iroquois engine, two Mk.1 outer wing panels, et cetera. The biggest mistake made in cancelling the Arrow program was probably the concurrent abandonment of the Iroquois engine…which could have been a real moneyspinner (think: Iroquois-powered Phantoms…)
S.
Wow. I knew, vaguely, of the intention to replicate the Bugatti 100P, but not that the project was so far advanced…and I’d never so much as heard of the Mullin Museum. Dang, I want to visit that place…
S.
Heh heh, that was fun. Yep, ’tis SL721 (at the 2013 Hamilton airshow), messed-with for a few minutes in Photoshop (at which I’m certainly no expert). Having seen Furies with two seats under an extended canopy, I’d long wondered what a T.16 Spit would look like…more elegant than the Supermarine T.9 (though admittedly the rear seat would be cramped and visibility not that good), and somewhat less curious-looking even than the “Grace T.9”. Wanted to do my version of that too, which would have a slightly-exaggerated bulge to the front hood and a flatter-than-usual rear one for more of a standard Mk.IX profile, but couldn’t quickly locate a suitably-hi-rez Mk.IX profile in my library.
The tacked-on markings BTW reflect “my” Spitfire; the codes are 403 Sqn RCAF but also my nephew’s initials (can’t use my own on an authentic Spit livery…) and I went with SL542 as the serial since that’s a project XVI that’s been in Canada for some time…straining for a bit of plausibility! All in good fun. (Course VWoC did want to introduce a two-seat fighter into their operation…)
Cheers
S.
TJ–
Spartan colours probably will be seen on a restored Mossie before all that long…the Calgary museum’s example is slated for static display restoration soon and at last word the plan was for her to wear Spartan livery. She’s a B.35 identical to Mr Jens’ Mossie. (The Spitfire Mr Jens owns is TZ138/C-GSPT, once Cleveland racer CF-GMZ and before that a cold-weather test aircraft with the Winter Experimental Establishment fleet in northern Alberta, so has a significant–if oddball–Canadian history. She is kept pristine but unflown at Vancouver, and the Mossie is said to be joining her there. The prospect of VR796 and KA114 together existed briefly, during plans for an airshow that were ongoing before the Yagen collection went up for sale last summer. It will almost certainly not now happen, since that show is not still planned, and Mr Jens’ Mossie will likely have been flown then grounded before Mr Yagen’s Mossie takes to the air again…pity all round!)
S.
Here’s M2H Hawk Major C-FAUV during one of its very few public showings–during an indoor car show at the 1990 Canadian National Exhibition in Toronto. Refurbished to very nice static display condition at the old International Vintage Aircraft shop at Mt.Hope (Hamilton), Ontario, in the late 80s, it belonged–and likely still does–to the private Thomson/Rubin collection at Markham, north of Toronto. They also have the remains of the ex-Hudson’s Bay Company Percival Proctor 6 stored.
S.
Actually not anymore it isn’t…that was the original intention but the project has now switched back to Mercury engines. Apparently R1535s in restorable shape are very rare, and since CWH is already operating one Mercury-powered aircraft, Lizzie C-GCWL, it made more sense to go with Mercs. (119 BR Sqn RCAF, the Hamilton Tigers, operated both the standard IVs and most if not all of the small batch of IVWs with Eastern Air Command, so the livery of the completed Boly will be the same, only the serial number being changed. The Boly is coming along very nicely at CWH, just a few miles from here.)
S.
BlueNoser–
Yes, Cliff Robertson most certainly did own a Spitfire–ex-COGEA Mk.IX MK923, registered N521R, and beautifully displayed on the northeast-US/eastern Canada circuit by ex-RAF Canadian Spitfire pilot Jerry Billing from the early 70s through the mid 90s. Billing flew out of Windsor, Ontario. Ultimately MK923 was sold to the McCaw brothers in Washington state. It is now displayed statically at the Seattle Museum of Flight. There are some online videos by Dave Cheeseman showing Billing flying MK923 back in the day…
S.
What is now the PoF D3A “Val” was restored to fly, and did so, in Canada in the late 1960s. Much non-original material (such as a Wright R2600 out of a Mitchell, and the vertical fin off a Harvard) was employed in the restoration, though, the D3A (registered CF-TZT) did not fly much, and ultimately it was gifted to the museum at Rockcliffe which exchanged it with Planes of Fame for a Sikorsky R-4 helicopter. PoF, probably wisely, declined to fly it…I think it may be the only World War II Axis bomber (as distinct from postwar licence-built bombers of Axis design, like the CASA 2-111s) to have been flown in the “Warbird era”. Any others??
S.
Yes, that’s why I cited that price as “mentioned”. I have no idea whether that’s the real figure..or even anything close. Of course Mr Russell does not need to sell the Hurricane or 109. This same thing happens constantly with vintage cars: for example, one of my two Studebakers was previously owned by a gent who had two of them himself, both of which were constantly, tacitly, for sale, at prices a bit above actual market value. The owner did not need to part with the cars, but if someone offered his price or something near enough, he would. He did eventually sell both–the second one to me at a “firesale” price after it developed a mechanical fault.
In the meantime, the Hurricane and 109 are safe and sound at Niagara South, and both will doubtless reappear on the circuit–sometime, somewhere!
S.
I remember seeing the Hurricane when it was being pieced back together by Jack Arnold at Seneca airfield near Cayuga, Ontario; at that time it was a bare frame painted all silver, and I suppose there could’ve been pretty much anything under that paint! Regrettably I never got a photo of 5481 back then. This of course was long before she went to the UK for rebuild to fly…1977 or thereabouts. (My uncle was part-owner of an Aeronca Champ based at Seneca around that time.)
The remaining Russell warbirds seem to be sort of tacitly for sale, but not actively marketed. A while ago I heard a figure of $14 mil mentioned on the 109; no idea how near the actual mark that was, but that’s probably too high in the present market for the 109 and Hurri together! As an aside, sort of, anyone have any info on plans for the Harvard (C-FFLR irc) Mr Russell also had?
S.
…Oh, and as to the centre section issues with the Hurricane…CWH would not likely operate the aircraft aggressively, so the restrictions would be less important to the museum than to many potential private operators.
If I ever find myself sole winner of one of the bigger LottoMax pots…somebody’ll have to be ferrying a certain Hurricane the few miles northwest from Niagara South to Mt.Hope. I wouldn’t even care I’d overpaid a smidge…
S.