I wonder if there is some confusion over which aircraft was moved by the Chinook, the details below imply that it was the Javelin
P7350 had the QV-B markings from 1978-81
and the BoB airframes relocated
Can we have the Hurricane P2617 back at Usworth from where it operated with 607 Squadron in 1940.
We would look after it 😀
Great to see the photos and those on facebook
http://www.demobbed.org.uk/locations.php?location=2431
Four Canberra cockpits
Problem is the aviation hall is in a building not owned by MOSI
, without any major attractions this year, I reckon attendee numbers will be down anyway.
I presume you are referring to the Vulcan or two Lancaster’s, neither of which graced the Sunderland Airshow which still has crowds in excess of 200,000 over the two days
Isn’t this the salient extract from the statement?
“No planning application has been submitted for development of the site, and the local council have made it clear that they wish to encourage further development as an active airfield”.
Unfortunately the lack of a planning application at this stage does not preclude the closure as an airfield. A disused airfield then becomes an ideal brownfield site to submit a planning application for. Much will depend on what the structure plan has to say on the housing need for the area and how to fulfil it. Sadly I think it is only a matter of time before the plans are submitted as there is already a pretty glossy website up and running to sell the proposal http://www.wellesbourne-west.com/planning.html.
The council may have stated support for the continued aviation use on page 14 of in the core strategy to 2031, but much depends on the wishes of the owners who seem at best non-committal to its continued aviation use
I was the VC-10 manpower planning manager on the Super VC-10 project
The VC-10 recovery from Abingdon was not as simple as gear down flaps down and off you go.
The aircraft had been sat outside for best part of 10 years and used for spares.
They were surveyed and rebuilt over a period of several months to have basic systems for hydraulics and pneumatics for a one off flight under MOD control
The recovery operation for the 5 aircraft took almost 12 months and many thousand man hours and was over 30 years ago when the rules were somewhat different
In the current risk adverse environment I doubt it would be sanctioned today.
Incidentally the alternative of dismantle, road to Filton and re-assemble was also considered but not proceeded with as the aircraft would have needed to be stress jacked to remove the wings
One off flight for XM655 sanctioned by the CAA as likely at winning the Eurolottery on the UK Lotto together
Meanwhile Sgt. Coppins is still in the desert. Nobody looks for him….
mmitch.
Searches have been carried out without success, but at the end of the day we have to be practical.
Sadly there are many from our armed forces that will never be recovered for a variety of reasons and I think Sgt Copping may become one of those
I personally have relatives that died in combat and have no known grave.
I am grateful that their service is recorded on several memorials and do not expect the search to continue
As I have said previously it is time to move on until there is more concrete news
It’s not LongHorsley but it is in Northumberland.
Less than 10 miles apart, maybe Acklington is where it was heading for
From http://www.ukserials.com/losses-1958.htm
07/03/1958
WL733 Sea Balliol T21
Old Sarum Station Flt Force landed at Acklington, Northumberland after the engine lost power due to overheating. To the AIU at Lee-on-Solent and then to Fleetlands before being struck off charge
Could this be the aircraft ?
In my opinion, the RAF Museum was in a no win situation with regards to the Copping P40 from when it was discovered.
They could have simply expressed no interest in the aircraft as they were already financially committed with other projects.
They were not to know or could have predicted the Arab Spring and its consequences.
We would all be applauding their actions if the aircraft had arrived in the UK as planned but plans can go wrong and I think as a community we have become a little carried away with the perceived value of unrestored incomplete Spitfires.
Let us not forget that some bold and expensive decisions were taken under the previous director
These include the purchase of the Bristol Brigand, the move by road of the Nimrod and VC-10 to Cosford and the Dornier recovery all of which I believe the previous administration would have not contemplated
Not all deals go as planned, are we any nearer seeing the arrival of the Havoc which I believe was part of the previous Spitfire swap ?
Time to move on
I for one welcome this, if the news is true, as it moves the container and its contents to a more secure location.
The rights and wrongs of the Spitfire payment are to me of no consequence. That was the considered commercial payment for what was agreed between the RAF Museum and the recovery team at the time. Alternatively the RAF Museum could have simply paid the cost of the work.
As to its current or future ownership, had it ever been the case that the RAF Museum had secured title to the aircraft before instructing the recovery?
It would be good to see it preserved as is, just like the Halifax at Hendon as I think it tells a more important story than being in the air with several others of its type.
Time to park the thread again until there is some more concrete news
Have a look on forces reunited as he is listed along with all of his postings fr.om 1960 to 1996