I was told (many moons ago) that when a Buccaneer had been completed at Brough, they were towed with wings folded along a main road to an airfield a few miles away. Was this true?
mmitch.
Certainly true
see here http://www.rafcommands.com/forum/showthread.php?3931-RAF-Holme-on-Spalding-Moor-Yorkshire
I also remember that pic of an Li2. The fuselage was faired out plus turrets to look faintly realistic but the effect was totally ruined by retaining the low wing position.
It was this one https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=668851633211183&id=388964444533238
All, can we just remind ourselves. At no point has the Midland Air Museum indicated its doing anything different with this aircraft.
Mark,
The comment has been noted, however the thread has given an opportunity for the issues associated with the potential disposal of the NMUSAF loan aircraft to be discussed.
Perhaps the title of the thread would be best altered to reflect the wider topic that has been highlighted and discussed
I wonder how IWM will fare with their proposed divestment of the T-33 and F-100 from the AAM
I would think Duxford have a clear path to send them back to Dayton as happened with the Mystere IVA which subsequently moved to Pima
it could have been moved on quite quickly.
Bruce
In theory this is correct.
However in practice re-allocating an aircraft that is on the books of the USAFM such as these is not easy.
There appears to be no one in the USA who can sanction moves of these airframes.
I am sure that Bentwaters Museum would willingly have the F100 from Headcorn. I also know that at least one other museum is reviewing the need to retain their 3 USAFM loan aircraft and are having problems in sorting out any sensible solution. There is no clear path for re-allocation outside of national collections and the risk is that the aircraft will be sent to Molesworth for destruction, which may also be the fate of the OH58 Helicopter that has recently gone their from Shrivenham
A C Heath commissioned 4.3.36
M N Crossley 03.02.36
Would agree that the date on the photograph pre-dates Ocotber
From experience of 607 Squadron, I doubt that all the pilot names will be in the ORB as the prewar ones are not usually day by day
It may be possible to pick up some of them from the London Gazette and Flight Archives
P M Brothers, G Harris, H B Russell all joined the Squadron on 11/10/36
H C Maudsley & P E G G Conolly joined on 31/08/36
Gerry,
Can you not order them online from the National Archive.
I think it is only £3.30 for each month
I would say that it is definitely XH767
Thanks for providing another piece in the jigsaw
I wonder if it is the one at Elvington as it may have moved temporarily from Monkton Farleigh where it was with the Avon Aviation Museum before going to the City of Norwich Museum
I believe that some of the Avon Aviation Museum members were also involved with the Meteor Flight at Yatesbury.
I can not think of any others that would have been in a dismantled condition around that time and can not remember the Javelin being assembled
See here http://www.derelictplaces.co.uk/main/showthread.php?t=17606
A most knowledgeable person who was always willing to share his knowledge
A great loss
She is wonderfully significant in the history of the type in the U.K
Absolutely agree which is why I gifted to Solway many years ago when it was at risk of becoming a children’s plaything.
Thanks to Bill Fern from South Yorks for collecting the airframe on a Hiab and taking it to Carlisle as part of a three way swap which resulted in a few other bits moving round to various museums
…and doubtless considerably more on doing the same with the VC-10.
If it happens, of which I have my doubts.
Incidentally, BAe gave serious consideration to this as an option when recovering the aircraft from Abingdon to convert them to tankers, but decided that rebuilding and flying them was a better option. Cosford is not an easy place to bring in an aircraft the size of the VC-10 by road, the Nimrod was a bit of a challenge. For comparison the VC-10 is 32 ft longer and has a 32ft greater wingspan
[QUOTE=WH904;2189218]Tin, how can they defend ignoring XT597, especially when they have a research aircraft collection?
The powers that be are not ignoring it, the aircraft is privately owned just like the Boulton Paul BP111A which sits outside at the Midland Aircraft Museum and perhaps deserves a space at Cosford ahead of XT597.
The RAF Museum at Hendon has a Phantom just as it was in service. Therefore there is no strong driver to add XT597. Much as I would like to see XT597 in a museum this will only happen if the buying price is met, as the price reflects the cost of acquisition and moving to Bentwaters and storage in the interim. I do not think the current owners are making absolute fortunes out of the small number of airframes that seem to find new owners. I for one can not remember the last aircraft to be scrapped by Everett’s. I would hazard a guess that they have scrapped less than Hendon, Cosford and Duxford together.
With respect to the Dornier, it is the last of the type and no doubt is intended to go to Hendon eventually. Whether it is worth the cost of recovery and restoration only time will tell. To my mind there is no undue bias to WW2, if this was so the RAF Museum would not have spent over £100,000 in moving the Nimrod by road to Cosford.