dark light

Thunderbird167

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 331 through 345 (of 895 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Wellington book #951142
    Thunderbird167
    Participant

    Steve,

    I have some photographs from 1952 of Wellington T.10 aircraft at Topcliffe from a Navigator under training.

    Would you be interested in making contact as this is probably the last UK use of the Wellington

    Regards

    Dave Charles

    in reply to: If only there was surplus available like this again!! #951323
    Thunderbird167
    Participant

    Great stuff, reminds of the adverts you see in the back of old ‘Flight’ mags for demobbed aircraft.

    A different era I know, but I grew up with the Shackleton Spares adverts in the back of mags, they seemed to have everything for British a/c (inc Shack nose cannons when I enquired!), anyone know who they were and what happened to them?

    A bit on the background to the Company here

    http://britishaviation-ptp.com/ws_shackleton.html

    in reply to: VC-10 Retirement Thread (merged) #970180
    Thunderbird167
    Participant

    Even The Hunter?

    Yes

    From Wiki

    Initially, low internal fuel capacity restricted the Hunter’s performance, giving it only a maximum flight endurance of about an hour.

    Another difficulty encountered during the aircraft’s introduction was the occurrence of surging and stalling with the Avon engines. The F.2, which used the Armstrong-Siddeley Sapphire engine, did not suffer from this issue. Further problems occurred; ejected cannon ammunition links had a tendency to strike and damage the underside of the fuselage, and diverting the gas emitted by the cannon during firing was another necessary modification. The original split-flap airbrakes caused adverse changes in pitch trim and were quickly replaced by a single ventral airbrake. This meant, however, that the airbrake could not be used for landings.

    However we are moving off topic, so back to the VC-10 please

    in reply to: VC-10 Retirement Thread (merged) #970968
    Thunderbird167
    Participant

    My contact at Brize has told me that they are not going to be used in the passenger role at all and they will be pure tankers.
    Phill

    This was announced in the strategic Defense review.

    As the support facilities now no longer exist at St Athan for the major and minor servicing the VC-10 will retire soon. Any extension is likely only to be for a few months rather than years. There will be a gap until the full Voyager fleet is delivered. The aircraft can not be that bad as it is already in service in Australia and has just been ordered by India. I am sure any problems with our fleet will be sorted

    in reply to: VC-10 Retirement Thread (merged) #971113
    Thunderbird167
    Participant

    so four years after retiring the Victor they realized it had to be replaced??? Surely they would have known before…

    Yes they did as this resulted is ASR415 & ASR416 for the conversion of 5 former BA Super VC-10’s and the fitting of pods to the transport VC-10’s.

    When the Air Tanker deal was signed the VC-10 out of service date was 2017. However the involvement in Iraq, Bosnia, Libya and Afghanistan has used up airframe hours. To keep the VC-10 in service would require the signing of a new support contract which the Government will not want

    in reply to: VC-10 Retirement Thread (merged) #971267
    Thunderbird167
    Participant

    something had to be done 20 years ago?

    Hence the birth of the FSTA proposal which has become the Air Tanker started back in 1997

    From Wiki

    The need for a new fleet of air-to-air refuelling aircraft was first identified in 1997. The use of PFI rather than purchase was chosen in 2000. The FSTA will be a Private Finance Initiative (PFI) where the RAF will pay for aerial refuelling and air transport missions as required. The RAF will continue to retain responsibility for all military missions, whilst the contractor will own, manage and maintain the aircraft and also provide training facilities and some personnel. The private company will also be able to earn extra revenue by using aircraft for commercial operations when not required by the RAF — the most suitable of which would be leased air-refuelling missions for other European air forces. The RAF however will always have the “first call” on aircraft, being able to mobilise the entire fleet in times of crisis

    in reply to: VC-10 Retirement Thread (merged) #980590
    Thunderbird167
    Participant

    VC-10 at Airshow

    I wonder if this means we could see the old ‘VC’ at some air shows this year…?

    I believe that RIAT has had confirmation of VC-10 to attend

    http://www.airtattoo.com/airshow/Newsroom/news/RAF-DELIVERS-AIR-TATTOO-XMAS-GIFT

    in reply to: Bloodhound missile survivors #981846
    Thunderbird167
    Participant

    There is a Mk1 with Wells Reclamation in Somerset

    http://www.bloodhoundmkii.org.uk/bh_relics_mk1.htm

    The one at Cosford

    http://www.bloodhoundmkii.org.uk/bh_relics.htm#cosford3

    in reply to: Otterburn Ranges? #989392
    Thunderbird167
    Participant

    Otterburn Targets

    Pictures in the scrapyard thread

    http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?p=1702192

    Page 41 & 42 with permission of the HMVF

    in reply to: BAE Hawk T.1 #1000941
    Thunderbird167
    Participant

    Is there a formal OSD for the T1s? Won’t the Reds continue to use them for the foreseeable future?

    According to Hansard the OSD Date is 2020

    http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201011/cmhansrd/cm110524/text/110524w0002.htm

    Hawk Aircraft

    Angus Robertson: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence by what date he expects the T1 Hawk training aircraft to be retired. [55484]

    Peter Luff: The Hawk T1 current planned out of service date is 2020. The aircraft is scheduled to cease its fast jet pilot training role at RAF Valley by December 2012, by which time it will have been replaced in this role by the Hawk T2 Advanced Jet Trainer. The Hawk T1 will continue to operate in other roles, including as part of the Royal Air Force aerobatic team.

    in reply to: Spitfire HF Mk.9 RR232 #1003993
    Thunderbird167
    Participant
    in reply to: Sea Harrier on Ebay #1005406
    Thunderbird167
    Participant

    The remains are indeed at Sproughton with Everetts

    in reply to: HAC Hurricane Sale #946411
    Thunderbird167
    Participant

    I don’t think so but he’s had several aircraft damaged by them.

    (Has there ever been a Hurricane Kermit?)

    Unlikely as I believe they are all given female names. So there is more chance of a Hurricane Miss Piggy

    in reply to: Whilst discussing the RAF's Mk XVI Spitfires.. #963977
    Thunderbird167
    Participant

    That looks like overall silver paint to me, admittedly with a blue cast?

    DD

    Behind the Spitfire is a Vampire T.11 in the standad Silver Scheme. When the image is enlarged the two are different so I think this is the blue colour on the spitfire

    in reply to: Whilst discussing the RAF's Mk XVI Spitfires.. #964160
    Thunderbird167
    Participant

    I’m imagining a similar blue to that used on Swift WK198, but look forward to seeing the photo!

    A bit like this

    http://www.ww2color.com/nennius/webapps/slides/slides.php?action=update&primary_key=01447

Viewing 15 posts - 331 through 345 (of 895 total)