dark light

Thunderbird167

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 361 through 375 (of 895 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Phantom to Bruntingthorpe??? #956367
    Thunderbird167
    Participant

    FAAM already have one Phantom thanks [/url]

    I think the comment about the Admiral’s Barge refers to the Sea Harrier

    in reply to: Airworthy Vampire for sale #961878
    Thunderbird167
    Participant

    Goblin Specific fuel consumption: 1.3 lbf/lb/hr

    Avon Specific fuel consumption: 0.932 lbf/lb/hr

    According to Wiki so the Goblin burns more fuel

    in reply to: Pilot Officer Harry Lionel Tarbitten DFC #981615
    Thunderbird167
    Participant

    From the London Gazette whilst with 9 Squadron

    http://www.london-gazette.co.uk/issues/35454/supplements/710

    Was previously a Sergeant with the service number 985785 before being commissioned with the service number 114962

    in reply to: Phantom to Bruntingthorpe??? #982231
    Thunderbird167
    Participant

    If privately run museums can not have Phantoms what is the official status of those at Carlilse and Tangmere. Do they effectively belong to the RAF Museum ?

    in reply to: Radlett 1969 #986910
    Thunderbird167
    Participant

    When was the Halifax ‘nose’ moved !!!!,i seem to remember it as a huge birds nest.

    On 30 October 1965 a trailer wound its way through Cheltenham with the massive bulk of the front half of a four engined bomber’s fuselage on board. This was the nose section and crew compartment of the very last surviving Handley Page Halifax heavy bomber – PN323 – stablemate to the Lancaster and Bomber Command’s longest serving bomber on wartime operations. It had been transported from the Handley Page works at Radlett in Hertfordshire and was being presented to Skyfame by Graham Trant and Harry Levy, in whose custody it had rested for several years. Once restored to its previous condition, the nose section will be on view for visitors to enter and inspect.”

    from http://glostransporthistory.visit-gloucestershire.co.uk/JetAgeRMCSkyfame.htm

    in reply to: HawkerHind.com #989005
    Thunderbird167
    Participant

    Vintage Flyers can be found here

    http://www.vintage-flyers.com/

    in reply to: Brothers who were military pilots? #990654
    Thunderbird167
    Participant

    The Barnwell Brothers

    John Sanders Barnwell Killed 19/06/1940 flying with 29 squadron

    Richard Anthony Barnwell – Killed 29/10/1942 flying with 102 squadron

    David Usher Barnwell – Killed 14/10/1941 flying with the Malta Night Fighter Unit

    Their father, Captain Frank Barnwell was also a military pilot and Chief Engineer at the Bristol Aircraft Company who lost his life in a flying accident on 02/08/1938

    in reply to: HawkerHind.com #990774
    Thunderbird167
    Participant
    in reply to: A nice lady wrote to the Spitfire Society… #996400
    Thunderbird167
    Participant

    According to the Scamble Airshow reports it could be Lakenheath 1988 as there was a Spitfire present and Stearman G-AROY

    in reply to: Duxford disposals #1003665
    Thunderbird167
    Participant

    Now there’s a man thinking outside of the box!

    Unfortunately thinking out of the box moves it from its current box (hangar) to the outside display.

    I feel long term that the objective at Duxford is for everything to be inside which could be a potential problem long term for the DAS.

    Thunderbird167
    Participant

    TFC’s Hawk 75 has never been a P-36. Built on contract for the French Air Force, delivered to France. Much beaten up frame, recovered without engine and outter wing section by Michell Pont from the Cazaux gunnery range. Then sold on to Michel Berthelot, in Beauvais, then sold on to Raymond Capel, in La Ferte-Alais, from whom TFC bought it in1995

    from
    http://www.warbirdinformationexchange.org/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=2234

    in reply to: Gatwick Aviation Museum Planning Application #1004306
    Thunderbird167
    Participant

    Having read the planning appeal decision the grounds for rejection are principally based on the new building being some 45% larger than the buildings it will replace.

    The inspector was not unsympathetic to the idea of an aircraft musuem but has to work within the requirements for planning within a green belt area.

    Maintaining the green belt has appears to have been the main reason for the refusal.

    in reply to: Boscombe Down Aviation Collection updates #1004326
    Thunderbird167
    Participant

    Even the two Phantoms?

    Not on their exhibit list

    in reply to: Duxford disposals #1004467
    Thunderbird167
    Participant

    Whilst we might debate the rights and wrongs of disposing particular aircraft what can not be disputed is that the IWM will need space for future additions.

    I am pleased to see that the disposal process has been more thought out than the previous disposals which lead to the scrapping of the VArsity, Comet 2 and Convair VT-29.

    This time no one could complain that the aircraft have not been given a good opportunity to be moved on to other collections.

    All museums have finite space and resources which lead to reviews of what can be maintained. How many collections have never disposed of any exhibits ?

    in reply to: Hurricane individual codes 607 and 238 sqns #1005270
    Thunderbird167
    Participant

    A transcribed copy of the ORB we have NEAM records this as a He111. No reference to serials

    Thanks
    Dave

    The logbook of Francis Blackadder records that he shot down both a BF110 and He111, although there is only a combat report for the He111, on the day and was flying R4189.

    R4189 was lost on 28th September with the pilot Flt Lt M M Irving.

    Francis had flown the same aircraft (R4189) earlier that morning. His usual aircraft was P2874 (AF:F) which he had flown the previous day

Viewing 15 posts - 361 through 375 (of 895 total)