The RAMCO website reports it as sold

I think this may be on the Defence Sales web site by mistake

Between Concorde and the Airbus Wings were the following

Manufacture of Centre Fuselage for BAE146
Two contracts for conversion of VC-10 airliners to VC-10 Tankers
Depot Level Maintenance of over 300 F-111 aircraft for the USAF
Conversion of A300 airliners into Freighters
“C” & “D” checks on A300/A310 airliners
Active parts manufacturing for many aircraft (machine shop, press shop)
Trailing Edge assemblies for A330/A340
Wing Equipping for A320

So the site may not have been assembling complete aircraft but manufactured components for and maintained many other aircraft

There are three photographs in the flight archives for 1989 (1716,2615,2110)

Not the aircraft but a nice model

http://modellbauer.foren-city.de/topic,11106,-harrier-gr-5-mit-sonderlackierung-in-1-72.html

Here is the aircraft

http://www.transportarchive.org.uk/getobject.php?rnum=G3946&searchitem=&mtv=G1&pnum=113

I would imagine that the heritage trust at Bristol would have photographs

http://www.rolls-royce.com/about/heritage/branches/bristol.jsp

I have the diary of a 607 squadron member from the Battle of France period.

I also have a typed up account from another groundcrew member from 607 squadron who was in France. This was given to me when he attended his first reunion at the age of 82. He was very grateful that I was interested to listen to his story, as he was only 18 at the time of joining the squadron. He was also very pleased when the following day he was able to introduce me to his son and after many years was able to have it confirmed that he was not just telling war stories and that the events he witnessed were true.

I regret that I did not spend more time recording the recollections of others when they were alive.

I would urge you to encourage your contact to make at least an audio record of his experiences if he can not committ them to paper. First hand accounts from the Battle of France are quite rare.

Whilst it is very commendable to want to bring the aircraft back to life I think the cost and resources required to ground run an engine could be put to much better use.

Also there will be the not inconsiderable issue of the insurance costs for such an activity.

I am very much in favour of dropping an engine for future undercover display. However serious thought must be given to how the engine will be moved over the somewhat waterlogged ground between the Vulcan and the buildings.

It is heartening to see the enthusiasm but this must be set against the realism of what the task involves.

I would not suggest that the aircraft could evere be ground run where it is as the rent from the Mobile Phone Mast behind the aircraft also provides some of the funding for the museum so shaking it to bits might not be very productive.

Wonder if these articles from Flight are of any use as they mention the air start system

http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1959/1959%20-%200449.html

http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1958/1958%20-%200305.html

The Meteor is WM366 previously at Lasham so I would guess the Hunter is E-423 from Lasham