Link broken
To sum it up:
Cost and the fact it’s not a mature system
I agree with the last comment about the USN but also remember the fact that the F-35C is the only one being souly bought but the US so DoD, LM and Congress are more likely to let it go,
Just thought i’d mention that F-35 is single engine too,
but that’s not the reason there is doubt about it,
the reason, is cost.
Sorry I thought I made it clearer. It was a mistake to go F-35 IMHO for it being single engine, as well as the cost issue
Regards
Really Canada need a twin engined jet due to the long range missions over barren land, that pretty much rules Gripen out if they decided not to go with F-35 (For Canada it always has been a mistake due to the single engine).
I would go for SHornet as they can tap into USN supply chains.
Regards
Nick
I do see where your coming from, is it 3 or 4 we needs and where does this total come from???
Nick
I think that is a sensible comment. We need to get away from the Cold War concept of a lonely SSBN lurking somewhere in the Atlantic waiting for Radio 4 to go off air. If we keep nuclear weapons we need to find a way to incorporate them into weapon systems we actually use. Money is so tight that the idea of a dedicated deterrent force which does nothing else is past its sell by date.
Exactly my point, we need to keep costs down, I mean even if we do buy dedicated SSBNs it doesn’t mean an insert into the tubes can’t let it be used as a SSGN when not needed in the nuclear role.
Nick
I really do think this argument is quite stagnant, I agree with Swerve on his argument though 🙂
Why don’t we all be good boys and not have a deterrent :diablo:
We aren’t making a mistake with new Trident all we pretty much need to fund is the boats and the purchase of the systems, very little in the way of R&D. This will allow us to save as much money as possible. Personally I think that we could get away with 3 boats and the excess could be used to fund conventional systems or a SSGN.
We must look at the possibility of mounting a 4/6 tube module on Astute as a possible Batch 2.
With the above what I’m saying is we need to look at all the options but IMHO it really does need to be sub based as that’s the norn these says.
Nick
That looks interesting, what airframe is it?
Looks like a 146?
Sorry but which of the 3 nations you mentioned above is going to be operating 2 state of the class carriers???? NONE
The CdeG is the only decent carrier in Europe and we will have 2, very adaptable for mission, carriers
Nick
P.S. I agree with Jonesy arguements regarding Son Of/Trident
Will the Wildcat be given a full ASW suite or will that mainnly be left to Merlin and Wildacat be optimised for ASuW???
Also you need to remember that intergration doesn’t mean UK service. If I was AgustaWestland I would be wanting to sell this aircraft abroard…..
Regards
Nick
If I was fighting one of those two I would preferably have F-22 (modified for SEAD :dev2: )and Typhoon as fighters and B-2’s as bombers….Level them and then role a nice few colums of tanks in 😛
TOW was retired when Apache came online – just door guns now….
I have heard that Brimstone or Spear will be intergrated onto the Wildcat as its main role will actually be as a recce chopper….
Nick
As said before Somalian, or West Country (I’m from Swindon and thats near enough but god do I not sound like a West man -Gotta love being a moonraker :P)
Nick