[COLOR=”#FF0000″]I’d really like to see a comparison between the JF-17 vs F-16. :dev2:
Isnt the AA combat record for the F16 around 76-1 and the FA18 2-1? http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?180731-Modern-fighter-combat-records
The SH and Hornet are excellent missile haulers and versitile platforms, but they aren’t as optimised for the AA role as say the eurocanards (especially the latest versions) or the Flankers.
So how’s the Gripen NG going?
Stage 5 with production started on the dedicated Gripen E testbed airframes.
So it has been flying with one AESA, now it has the final AESA (4 channel) and IRST integrated as well as basically all new avionics.
The road forward:
Build the final design instead of twin seat testbed. (started)
Test the new sir intakes (higher airflow) and other smaller improvements to the fuselage. (unknown status)
Test the new build quality of the improved manufacturing. (partially done)
Improve flight envelope. (partially done)
Start production, 2016-2018 (not sure exactly).
And there is a lot more small stuff, one of them is the continous improvements of the EWS with new releases every 6 months. What the final design will be is probably undecided.
When will we see a F22 vs F35 topic? could be fun
F-22 vs. F-35 http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?80793-F-22-vs-F-35
(It’s not as fun as one might expect)
let’s see:
– LM could have used available data from previous fighters to reach its goal (lentgh, hook angle, etc…)
IIRC they used the original FA18 hook in the beginning, the the short distance between the hook and rear wheels seems to be the biggest problem… but the solution was to redesign the hook instead of making the whole assembly longer and more normal (in a historical comparison). I am pretty sure they would have better results if the hook touches down further behind the wheels (preferrably twice the current distance).
“If anyone tells you five out of eight is good, it’s not.”
I would say the pilot has made an impressive trial nevertheless.
Good point. If hook design is such that it 37.5% of landings see the hook miss the wire, then it’s probably back to the drawing board as you don’t want to 37.5% of landings to be bolters.
Just look at the design and the result gets pretty obvious…

I got to say Im impressed that he managed to have successful trap in 5/8 trials. The pilot who succeeded in that is a true champ.
Can Rafale or Super Hornet land autonomously on a carrier? I have no idea.
No they cant. But there are 4,5 gen fighters that can utilize autonomous landing. The pilot picks a spot on the display and the ac will touch down on that spot with high accuracy.
IIRC the redesigned hook (without a new damper) got 5 out of 8 with the three misses being chalked up to misplaced hook (ie pilot error).
If you look at the geometry of the whole arrestor hook assembly it’s pretty clear why the result was 5/8. But on the other hand, there are 4.5th gen fighters operational today that can land autonomously so this should be a ‘non issue’. After all, the F35 is much more high tech than all the others in every aspect…
Didn’t know that, thanks.
It seems this topic is not realistic coz there isn’t any big program aiming for hard kill APS for aircraft
You already have the IRIS-T with that capability. If it is succesful in reality it will redefine what a “self defense” weapon is.
There is no question Su-35 is heavier than Su-27S, but the question is how much? Difference between F-16 blk30 and blk 50+ is 530 kg and between blk30 and 60 is 1410 kg including CFTs. Baseline Su-27 weigh 16380kg and roughly has similar equipment to blk30 F-16. Even if the weight increase is ~1410 kg it makes 17790 kg for Su-35 (16910 if weight increase is 530 kg). Considering the amount of lift Su-35 can produce, its a negligable difference in Wing loading, but there is a nice increase in T/W: 1.18 for Su-27, 1,28 for Su-35. (clean 4700kg fuel). Unlike F-16, Su-35 also recieved some weight reductions; Engines, Radar, fly-by-wire, nav computer, are all lighter. Airframe is redesigned and airbrake removed, so its possibly lighter. My estimate is Su-35’s empty weight is somewhere between 17 to 17,4 tons, however thats only an estimate, I have no sources to back it up.
I got it to minimum 16’600kg (assuming 8000kg worth of fuel as standard).
It will be interesting to see if Rafale will be able to meet the technical requirements of Canada — they may have some tricks up their sleeves that the Canadians did not consider when they wrote the requirements.
SAAB are usually in as many bids as possible but they left declined to participate because it wouldnt be a fair competition.
It’s not unlikely that the Canadian tender will be a copy of the Norwegian.
1/ What is the best method to detect target in general? Is it radar because I see the most important and most advertised sensor on fighter is its radar
Radar is typically the best, but IR is getting better and better and the RCS of the fighters keeps getting smaller and smaller so we will see how it looks in the future.
2/ Why there is no AA missile with both IR and radar homing. Different IR and radar versions on the same missiles exist but combo on one missile seems do not. Will IR sensor and radar block each other? If not, I think IR + radar combo will help to identify target between chaffs and flares and simply the logistics and mission choice, isn’t it?
Cost and space, but having IR + TV would be interesting since small full HD HDR cameras only take up a few millimeters.
3/ In according to chaff and flare, I think TV guided can distinguish them because there is no way to fake target in visible light with HDR camera, isn’t it true?
It would only work daytime, but for daytime engagements I thinks its a fantastic backup.
why would 15.5 tons low?. Su-35 is around 16 to 16.5 tons. (otherwise it wont have substantially different TWR than legacy Flankers considering its fuel capacity). This higher TWR is from Paris airshow.Su-35 plane is taller and bigger.
According to Knaapo the fueled weight is 24’600kg (2xR77 + pylons set to 400kg, 2xR73 +pylons set to 300kg), normal fuel is up to 8’000 kg so we end up at 16’600kg or more. According to http://www.airforce-technology.com/projects/su-35/ the weight is 18’400. The first number is depending on typical internal fuel.
I might be wrong, but if Pak Fa weighs in at some 16’500 kg it is fenomenal (and its not unlikely if the Su35 actually weighs 16,6 or so). Suddenly the 15,5 tonne figure doesnt feel like an impossibility, even though I will remain skeptic untill I get solid information from Knaapo or Sukhoi.
Erm, am I very confused or does the 117S not power the Su-35?
Which is not the same engine as the PAK-FA…?
I may have made a true rookie mistake.
I got confused that the 117S version came before 117 and that the 117S was used initially. :apologetic: (where is the shame smiley?)
@10,7 tonnes for Pak FA vs 11,5 tonnes for the F22 it’s a different thing. And after further enhancements of the F117 it’s not impossible that we actually might end up closer to mach 2.
The F-22 has fixed inlets, the PAK-FA variable geometry inlets.
I cannot emphasis how big a difference that can and will make.
Funny, i must have deleted that part before posting.
Yes, the intakes are very interesting. They allow for a high airflow, they have variable geometry etc but there is a large difference in dry thrust and thrust/weight ratio. Thats why I am skeptic.
But on the other hand… the MiG 25 with a similar thrust/weight ratio (wet) could reach up to ~mach 3.
So you might be right. I just noticed the difference in dry thrust and to me 25% advantage in a ratio is a substantial difference.
Lift dependent drag is essentially a negligible part of the overall drag polar at Mach 2.
Sure.
But you see that the Pak FA has a lower thrust/weight ratio than the F22 in this area right? We are talking about a ~25% advantage for the F22 and yet ppl claim the Pak FA will supercruise much faster? I am a little bit skeptic.
I think the best is to wait and see for the absolute numbers. It’s likely that the final engine will produce more dry thrust and then we have a different situation where it is possible that the Pak Fa can supercruise faster than the F22. I just want to know the actual data, and i think i’ll hae to wait a couple of years.