No certificate with RomBAC either?
The Great Eurozone is on the verge of collapse may be Britain will wait for a bit longer ! Staying out of Euro has worked out rather well for them/
No doubt you’ll be offering them the Great Rupeezone shortly.
An obit by the Telegraph:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/defence/8713429/Red-Arrows-pilot-killed-in-crash.html
Already a thread on the subject, please continue at
It’s not a 0, but an O for obsolete. It’s ment to avoid confusion when there are conflicting serial numbers in a different fiscal year. The O is occasionally given to aircraft older than ten years.
It was used a lot more prior to the 1970s.

The taxpayers will be delighted!
Boeing Projects About $300 Million Overrun on Tanker Contract
By Tony Capaccio – Jun 24, 2011 8:55 PM GMT+0200
Boeing Co. (BA) is projected to exceed its cost ceiling by as much as $300 million — about 6 percent – – on the initial contract to develop and build U.S. Air Force aerial refueling tankers, according to government officials.
So with a better radar and more modern missiles, it can be doable for the F-104S?
But then it’s not an F-104S anymore.
Coal ramjets of course!
Freedom Fries, the French are evil, they hate us because of our freedom, Fox is unslanted, yadayadayada….
The retired Viggens went to the scrapman. There never were any for sale.
Always loved the tandem-engined designs.
There were more surviving La-15s until at least the early 1990s. In a German documentary, there was a report on the Soviet nuke design. It showed some (then-)recent footage of a testing ground in Kazakhstan complete with a mock-up airfield for testing the results of a not-too-close airburst.
Because of radioactivity and Oblomovism the target airfield hadn’t been cleared. There were at least a dozen La-15s there.
Belarus also operates Mig-23 in small numbers I think…
No they don’t.
or bribes, if the vendor is BAE Systems, Dassault, or Saab…:diablo:
…or Lockheed, or Northrop…
You’re welcome 🙂
Some corrections to your site:
– The ‘North Korean’ Mi-24 is actually a US Army agressor with OPTEC/OTSA
– The chemical sprayer wasn’t a proposal. It’s a painting ordered by and paid for during the 1980s Red Scare. Published in some annual military review.