dark light

Arthur

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 3,211 through 3,225 (of 6,424 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Chinese Il-76 at Zhukovsky #2662267
    Arthur
    Participant

    So these pics by Ken will find their way across Chinese boards as the Mooning Il-76? That would be cool…

    (Ken, in case you didn’t realise yet: these pics will circulate the web for months and months… can’t help but love the Chinese hobby guys!)

    in reply to: J-8II Info #2662285
    Arthur
    Participant

    Let’s leave it at that, Flogger. I’m glad you recognise the similarities are conceptual rather than technical, although i personally doubt you need blueprints just to come up with a similar concept :rolleyes:

    Sens,
    The Ching-Kuo wasn’t based that much on an existing design, but you can rest assured the engineers of General Dynamics who designed it took a lot of their experience with the F-16 with them. It’s an original design for sure, but that doesn’t mean it’s a Taiwanese design.

    in reply to: Chinese Il-76 at Zhukovsky #2662299
    Arthur
    Participant

    Hangared C-5s and C-17s hangared at US airbases have their asses sticking out exactly like this Il-76.

    in reply to: J-8II Info #2662437
    Arthur
    Participant

    But in that case, the whole need for the original drawings no longer was necessary. And you don’t need to have the Ye-152s drawings only to make a conceptually similar aircraft.

    The wings and tailplane are different, btw. The fin on the Ye-152A is tapered a lot more than the one on the J-8, different dimensions, different flap/aileron configurations on the wings… again, they are similar in concept, but not in design.

    in reply to: Yes, but is it Art ? #1965299
    Arthur
    Participant

    Ah well, this only makes it official.

    I’ve been Art all my life.

    in reply to: J-8II Info #2662448
    Arthur
    Participant

    So you say yourself that the J-8’s design is obviously different from the Ye-152A: different fuselage, different tailplane, different wings… if you acknowledge that,why do you keep insisting it is NOT a different design?

    in reply to: Newcomer toforum #2662458
    Arthur
    Participant

    Another member making sentences! This forum is getting better and better… a warm welcome to you too.

    in reply to: J-8II Info #2662464
    Arthur
    Participant

    Flogger,
    there are plenty of technical issues you can adress, perhaps if you try convincing me that way?

    in reply to: Yes, but is it Art ? #1965339
    Arthur
    Participant

    Now i know where my artistic genius lays!

    in reply to: IAF News and Pics (Aug 2004 onwards) #2662635
    Arthur
    Participant

    Thread cleaned and suspended for all you who think this is a place to fight out personal or national vendettas to read the Code of Conduct.

    http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=27964

    Read and weep.

    in reply to: J-8II Info #2662644
    Arthur
    Participant

    Flogger,
    Googling for “J-8 + Ye-152” doesn’t automatically make the articles reliable. Neither the authorative works on China’s aviation industry until the mid-1980s (China Today: Aviation Industry, as referred to by Rick) nor the authorative MiG book (50 years of secret aircraft design, as i referred to earlier considering the MiG-21 data) mention anything about a transfer of Ye-152A data to the PRC. Especially if you think that the whole Ye-152A design was totally preliminary and by no means an end-product: the Ye-152A (together with the Ye-150) evolved into the SINGLE engined Ye-152M/Ye-166 via the Ye-152/1, Ye-152/2 and Ye-152P (which also all were single-engined).

    Besides, while the J-8 is quite obviously based on the J-7/MiG-21F, the Ye-152A is NOT an adaptation of the MiG-21, but on the Ye-150 (which in itself was nothing more but an R15 testbed). The wide forward fuselage of the Ye-152A has nothing in common with the fuselage of the MiG-21, it has got that size because:
    a – It was to provide enough air to feed the massive R15 engine in the original Ye-150.
    b – In the Ye-152A, the nosecone was to provide space for a big Uragan radar + dish.
    If the Soviets simply wanted a two-engined long-range MiG-21 (like the Chinese originally wanted with the J-8/J-8I), the forward fuselage would never have been as fat as the Ye-152A’s. Just look at the pic of the single engined Ye-152P you posted, and compare the whole fuselage, tailplane and wings (yes! That’s wingtip pylons carrying those R-4s!) with those of the J-8. Conceptually similar? Well, if you’d take a two-engined Ye-152 they would be. Close enough to match original drawings? No way. As Crobato already said, not even the dimensions match. And acquiring drawings only in order to redesign those drawings COMPLETELY to end up with a similar looking aircraft is absolute nonsense.

    Two totally different development stories (and you can add a third similar-result-but-different-development with the Su-15 if you like), yet as happened quite a lot throughout the short history of aviation: a similar requirement leads to a similar design. Or do you also think the Su-24 is based on the F-111? The F-15 is based on the MiG-25? The Mirage III based on the F-102? The MiG-21I based on the XF-92?

    Well anybody is entitle to his own opinion that is the basics of democracy

    Forming an opinion, oblivious to facts is the basics(sic) of stupidity.

    Which aircraft were investigated? the Ye-152?

    Read before you write. Rick’s quote says …and on the investigation of foreign aircraft technologies.

    And could you please stop posting pics ad nauseum? If you want to illustrate something you’re trying to say, please add some explanation. Know what? Take this Ye-152A drawing, and mark out the design details you think have been literally taken over in the J-8.

    Good luck.

    in reply to: back collection of magazines… #1965400
    Arthur
    Participant

    That’s for the mods to decide.

    in reply to: Chinese Il-76 at Zhukovsky #2662741
    Arthur
    Participant

    As for the tanker theory: the central UPAZ pod on on Il-78s is mounted on a pylon sticking sideways from the upper rear fuselage, at the left side. A ‘mount’ for this has already been built in the Il-76 prototypes (as can be seen on the prototype preserved at Kirovohrad, Ukraine), and all Il-78s (be that Il-78, -78M or -78MK export) have this pylon. This Chinese Il-76 doesn’t have the pylon, and it doesn’t look like it’s about to be installed or recently removed either.

    in reply to: J-8II Info #2662750
    Arthur
    Participant

    Thanks for the infobits from The Book, Rick. I was to lazy to find mine 😉

    J-8 053 (see the pic above, it’s in the Beijing Military Museum) has c/n J8-0101 and is most likely the first prototype (considering the first Chinese-built J-5 was 0101 as well).

    Crobato,

    Flameout is a problem of the engines, not of the airframe. MiG-21 engines are never known for their reliability in any vintage or generation. It took a lot of reworking on the part of the Chinese to finally get an appreciable level of acceptance. I never believed that during the entire 40 year life cycle of the MiG-21, the engine reliability problem was completely fixed. The Chinese simply inherited the same problem. As they say, garbage in, garbage out.

    is utter nonsense. You’re talking about four different main families of engine (R11, R13, R21, R25), all of which indeed had some teething problems but eventually all became reliable enough for Soviet frontal service. Which means minimal maintenance for a relatively long time, followed by relatively short interval overhaul. Indeed the Chinese did seem to have problems with tweaking the R11/WP-11 but i guess you only need to look at China’s traditional self-destructive activities during the Mao years to figure that one out. Good thing those R13s arrived from Egypt…

    Flogger,
    Links which mention “J-2” production in China? Gimme a break.

    in reply to: Newcomer toforum #2662754
    Arthur
    Participant

    And don’t worry about being irritating Elider – i’m ever so happy we’ve got a new member who actually writes in sentences.

    Welcome aboard!

Viewing 15 posts - 3,211 through 3,225 (of 6,424 total)