Originally posted by Suggs
The Buccaneer! – Definitely still on of the best (if not THE best) low level strike bomber in the world – so good that te Uk Government scraped them rather than sell them overseas.
You mean just like the Italian G.91s? The Buccs were scrapped under CFE regulations, and also because the airframes were beat What do you think 30 years of low-level flying, half of which in salty sea air does to an airframe? Not because they were some secret wonder weapon. In fact, it was considered for some time to replace some of the Canberra’s tasks (EW training and such) with Buccs, but the state of those just wasn’t good enough to warrant further investment to use them for another five to ten years.
A lot actually. Look again.
How can you see the pattern on the arrays if the arrays are covered by tarpaulins? Not really helpful.
As for the English bit, the editor-in-me wishes to remark that Crobato forgot to emphasise one word.
[quote]”For the detection and localisation of hostile radar emissions and jammers the FT-2000 makes use of four ground-based Electronic Support Measures (ESM) sensor posts, each of which is mounted on wheeled vehicles and can together track 50 targets simultaneously.”
Bold by Crobato, underline by me.
Sorry for interrupting, now carry on…
Nice pics. Interesting to see the RWRs on top of the fin too, and the small antenna below the cockpit. Didn’t notice the latter before.
You mean how the absolute monkey’ed MiG-21PFV shot down full-pull USAF F-4Es and such?
It’s obvious you don’t like Russian gear, but the way you’re bashing them doesn’t seem to have the backup needed to make it justified.
Originally posted by JDK
Why would anyone want to buy a MacDonalds in France? :confused: Just try ANYTHING local, and treat your tastebuds.
Hmmm… Not necessarily. Local food tends to be absolutely wonderful in France, but you wouldn’t know how often i had to choke my way through a leather steak.
Also, Buffalo Grill and Quick seem to local French food too nowadays. Shudder!
Don’t forget to practice under all sorts of circumstances. Airshows, operational landing photography, sunny weather in high summer, sunny weather in winter, even grey weather… And digital photography is excellent for that, you don’t have to wait for your slides to be returned from the Developing Countries to see what mistakes you made.
Also, practice a lot with different lenses. Especially in landing shots, it took me some time before i could make a decent judgement on what focal length would be necessary.
Just go out to an airbase near you, try a bit, talk a bit to the other weirdos hanging out there, and they will probably give you some tips too.
Besides, the US did it’s share of monkey-ing it’s aircraft too. Venezuela and Indonesia just barely escaped the F-16/79, the P-3F was not allowed to be as advanced as the P-3C, and don’t think that the F-15S is anywhere near as well-equipped as the F-15E or even F-15I. It has to be said that the US plays the game both ways though – Taiwan ‘only’ got F-16As and E-2Bs if you look at the actual airframes delivered. But when you look at what’s inside those airframes, you’ll find that these are monkey-de-luxe variants.
Plenty of aviation/military mags to be bought at newsstands in the PRC. I got a sh!itload of them when i went there, and i did even restrain myself. Some seem to have some interesting info in them.
If there is anyone willing to translate an impressive-looking J-7 article from Chinese to something i can read, please contact me via PM.
Originally posted by GoldenDragon
…Again from from Spick, the Viper had 44 Israeli kills for no losses, 16 from the Pakistanis for no losses and 2 from the Dutch for no losses.
Sixteen Pakistani kills is to high, it should be eight with a few more unbacked claims and an appearant fratricide (altough that one of course does count :D). As for the second Dutch kill: nope, not true. There was only one.
“A downgraded Mig-21PF, known as a ‘monkey variant,’ was produced for export. this was mig-21FL. it had the inferior R-2L radar . . . The FL was also licensed produced in India by HAL (which explains in part the endless crashes). Other ‘monkey’ variants, were exported, including the Mig-21PFS.”
India’s MiG-21 crashes have very little to do with the outdated radar in the MiG-21FL, so please make a bit more credible suggestions next time. Also, for quotations of Spick these remarks make very, very little sense. The MiG-21PFS was not a ‘monkey version’ for example, it flew with the VVS just as well.
Originally posted by SD-10
China GDP is now 6 times bigger than it was 25 years ago. Which no major country has ever done in history.
Germany and the Netherlands 1945 – 1970, easily.
Add to this that Saki isn’t really the place to expect the roll-out of a new aircraft type, as there are no workshops capable of building a prototype, nor has any ever been built there as far as i know. It wouldn’t make sense anyway – it’s always been a Navyo-owned and operated airbase without any design or production facilities. An FSW aircraft being designed on the Navy’s behalf when it was in the middle of two very ambitious aircraft programs already (conventional carrier-based aircraft and high-capability VTOL aircraft) would definately be too much.
And then there is the whole SYB-desginator which doesn’t make any sense at all for Saki. ‘Syberski’ is not an alternative name for Saki – the full name of the airbase is Saki – Fyedorovka. There is no other town, village or settlement around the airbase which could suggest a ‘SYB’ prefix. The other similar designator prefixes all have very logical origins: TAG for Taganrog, RAM for Ramenskoye, and CASP for the Caspian Sea or Kaspiisk. But SYB for Saki? Naaaah….
Pal, you certainly know how to lift the level of discourse here!
Pal, you certainly know how to lift the level of discourse here!
Originally posted by Billy Bishop
According to my info Russia has two Mig-31D dedicated anti-satellite models (numbered 071 and 072), they entered service in 1986 and I have not read anything about them being withdrawn from service.
They never entered service. They entered trials at GLITs at Akhtubinsk, which is a test unit and not an operational one. 071 didn’t even have the full gear, this one was used for testing the optimal flightpath/launch pattern for ASAT ops.