Ah, an Aerosled (or Aerosen). It’s basically Santa’s vehicle with the reindeers replaced by a pusher prop, the Soviets actually used several versions for winter attacks during WW2. The one on the pic looks a lot like a Tupolev Tu A3, some 800 of which were built. It’s a neat little thingie, the 16th Air Army in Eastern Germany also had one for liasion and rescue in the snow. Because the A-3 had a boatlike hull, it is actually often misidentified as some sort of boat, which it isn’t. It’s a sled/sleigh.
Still looking for some good pics though…
People who compare the Q-5 to an A-10 or Su-25 should check their heads.
The Q-5 is something like the Vietnam-era F-5 in the attack role: fast, with a short range, small payload and very little autonomous ways of finding a target. Give the Fantan a decent LRMTS and you could perhaps compare it to a Jaguar, but it doesn’t even have that. The only thing the A-5 will be able to do, is perform low-and-fast VERY tactical attacks, a lightweight Su-7 if you like.
As for the reputed Q-5’s ruggedness: interesting claims, especially since i doubt many people here have ever seen a Fantan from up close. Trust me, the thing is hardly a rugged machine in the Su-7/25/A-10/Buccaneer class. It looks actually pretty fragile, and some parts of it (like the wings) don’t seem to be able to take much damage. I believe it’s a single-spar wing, for example. Maneuvring that thing with damage to the spar doesn’t seem a good idea to me…
Also, the nice piece of hot steel protruding from the two jetpipes looks like a perfect IRH missile magnet. Not really smart to use in a MANPAD-rich environment.
Still, it is a very pretty and whoa cool aircraft. Would love to see one fly…
It should be the some sort of MiG-31B(1/2)M upgrade. First priority of the program is to get the Foxhounds serviceable again (while nominally still operational, in practice the MiG-31 hardly ever flies operationally nowadays), but also some sort of upgrade which is either partly or for a significant part up to the -BM standard.
Either way, that upgrade program should be getting started seriously now since there are a lot of maintenance-expired MiG-31s at both NNovgorod and Rzhev (the type’s real maintenance plant) waiting for the upgrade which they should be recieving together with the necessary depot maintenance. Waiting any longer with the MiG-31 upgrade will simply mean there won’t be any more Foxhounds in service.
No, it’s in port most of the time. Too much Fluglรคrm for a comfy relaxing cruise.
Like their carrier ๐
Spasatel is big – it’s a SAR development of the Lun, and the Lun is the one with six Sunburn SSMs on it’s back. I don’t know if Spasatel’ ever left the factory, it had been in it’s finishing stages of production for almost a decade in the mid-to-late 1990s, and i don’t think it has been completed. Besides, considering the thing is in the factory at Nizhny Novgorod i doubt moving the thing to some other place (the Caspian or Black Sea for example) would go unnoticed even if it were finished.
This ‘N007’ could of course also be a smaller Ekranoplan, as the Soviets/Russians litterally designed and flew dozens of them. The WIG page mentions a lot, but there were even more (including those on the dump at Taganrog, damn you FSB for confiscating those pictures).
Here is the Lun, Spasatel looks the same but doesn’t have the missile tubes on the back. Not the sort of vessel to quietly visit some tradeshow in the US, as Ken nicely pointed out.
And it’s not an AEW UAV, but a relays system. We did have a thread on those UAVs here as well, in the News from Zhukovskii / MAKS-threads by Vympel and Flanker_Man. The other Zond-variants are in that thread as well.
All MiG-29S are 9.13 / FULCRUM-C’s (i guess it’s about time i start writing these designators in caps…), but not all 9.13 / FULCRUM-C’s are MiG-29S.
I love Russian and Soviet designation systems. Let’s have three or more designator systems running simultaneously, but please do make sure that no one-on-one translation from one variant to the other is possible ๐
No problem Erez, i can understand your security issues and even a mushroom-picking propagandist like me thinks you shouldn’t post stuff like that on a public forum.
But you can be sure to expect a private message if i’ll be coming over ๐
Nonono Flex, you’ve got it all wrong. Phantom actually saying ‘Thanks’ in what form is an absolute miracle.
The usual pattern is like this:
PhantomII:
“So can anyone provide me with a picture of XXXX, or at least give me some info where to look, especially on the weapons loadouts? I know you guys think i’m a whiner, but i still want to know.”
Then somebody else posts a picture as requested/gives the title to a book with the answer/compiles an answer here.
Then nothing.
Then a little bit more of nothing.
Then, either the deafening silence persists, or an answer like this comes up from our belaughed PhantomII:
“So why doesn’t anybody here want to help me out with my request? Anybody? I know you guys out there know this kind of stuff, is it because i ask the questions that you don’t want to help me? It is not even a question about my beloved Phantom this time. Is it because i am American?”
There are plenty of threads with this wonderful display of gratitude by our good PhantomII (check the Ju-87 thread on the Historic board), so Flex: you should definately feel flattered by Phantom’s wonderful and humble display of gratitude. Now if you could only help him with a weapons chart of the HU-25, that would really be great…
:p
Nah, the large/small fenestrons also both exist with the French Dauphins. From the SA365N2 onwards, the new large Fenestrons were issued.
According to Skythe’s site at http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Hangar/2848/heli2.htm , two variants of the Dauphin airframe are/were in use with the IDF, perhaps he can shed a light on this. From what i know they had two HH-65A’s (901 and 905, the latter one being w/o in 1996), and there should be seven AS565SA Panthers delivered, three of which are 882, 885 and 889).
Uh… it seems i’ve answered my own question here. Duh… Still, a good pic of one of Israel’s HH-65s could give nice comparison material for the variant crunchers amongst us ๐ . Anyone?
Originally posted by Erez
PII, why are you so afraid of me?:(
He’s often afraid by nature, don’t worry about that ๐
Anyhow, as you know my highschool is close as hell to Tel-Nof (just to make my point – from a certain hill I can see them taxing on the runway)…
I believe that certain hill has already been found… unfortunately, i don’t think there were any recent mushroom picking trips through Israel.
The aircraft seems the F-7M Airguard demonstrator.
Originally posted by Ja Worsley
Still retains the typical Russian look :p
With that rotor on top, you mean? Yeah, somehow Igor Sikorsky really put his home nation’s character on the helicopter concept ๐
Aren’t the Israeli Atalefs AS566, with the crappy American engine? They were bought through a US-funded program (hence their official HH-65 designation), but i’m not sure if they are built to the US or normal standard.