dark light

Arthur

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 5,971 through 5,985 (of 6,424 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Newest member #1962795
    Arthur
    Participant

    RE: Newest member

    I Hate to see what his posts are like

    &l;sarcasm&r;
    Well, having Hellaid as part of your handle is usually the sign of well-informed, polite, on-topic and very much aviation related posts. I don’t think this reincarnation of the Hellaid Bliss will be much different.
    &l;/sarcasm&r;

    in reply to: General Discussion #379786
    Arthur
    Participant

    RE: Increased security at London Heathrow.

    Scary times, Arthur? I guess it depends where you were born
    and grew up. I’m sitting less than a mile from a pub that
    the IRA blew up in the 1970s and travelled to London every
    day via a railway station and past a restaurant that were
    also subject to bomb attacks at the time I worked there.

    Well, considering i’m from just across the border from former RAFG Brüggen and Wildenrath, a total of three IRA attacks happened within my everyday surroundings. One hand grenade attack and the gunning of (accidental) Australian tourists both in Roermond, and a gunning near a restaurant/bar on the border towards Wildenrath. And if you add the handgrenade attack on a few Laarbruch-servicemen a bit to the north, i can’t say i have never been aware of the existance of terrorism.

    But it didn’t scare me back then, and neither does it now. That is, as long as the anti-terrorism-awareness doesn’t grow out of control and turns into total paranoia (so yes JJ, i agree with you).

    in reply to: Increased security at London Heathrow. #1962838
    Arthur
    Participant

    RE: Increased security at London Heathrow.

    Scary times, Arthur? I guess it depends where you were born
    and grew up. I’m sitting less than a mile from a pub that
    the IRA blew up in the 1970s and travelled to London every
    day via a railway station and past a restaurant that were
    also subject to bomb attacks at the time I worked there.

    Well, considering i’m from just across the border from former RAFG Brüggen and Wildenrath, a total of three IRA attacks happened within my everyday surroundings. One hand grenade attack and the gunning of (accidental) Australian tourists both in Roermond, and a gunning near a restaurant/bar on the border towards Wildenrath. And if you add the handgrenade attack on a few Laarbruch-servicemen a bit to the north, i can’t say i have never been aware of the existance of terrorism.

    But it didn’t scare me back then, and neither does it now. That is, as long as the anti-terrorism-awareness doesn’t grow out of control and turns into total paranoia (so yes JJ, i agree with you).

    in reply to: Crusader's wing #2092180
    Arthur
    Participant

    RE: Crusader’s wing

    [updated:LAST EDITED ON 14-02-03 AT 12:35 PM (GMT)]…is because at higher speeds than those
    encountered in the pattern, the raised wing might blanket
    the tail or worse, part company with the rest of the
    airplane for the same reason that aircraft have maximum flap
    and gear extension speeds. Nothing would ruin my day like
    looking in a rear view mirror and seeing that massive wing
    somersaulting independently of the rest of the ensemble.

    You’re forgetting that it is the wing which is doing the flying, not the fuselage. In fact, when an F-8 lowered the wing back into the fuselage after takeoff, it was actually the fuselage being moved up to match the wing in stead of the other way around. There is no way the wing could have flapped in case of a hinge/hydraulics failure or it could have blanked out the tail. Long before the wing would have reached such an AoA, it would have stalled anyway. It’s simply not possible.

    Edit: Ah, my post of last night is back as well. I was typing that but when i uploaded it, the Script Error appeared. Although the post was on the index this afternoon, i couldn’t see it so i retyped something similar. And now there’s two…

    in reply to: Crusader's wing #2092199
    Arthur
    Participant

    RE: Crusader’s wing

    Technically speaking, it’s not the which which has variable incidence, it’s the fuselage. After all, the wing is doing the flying so the wing is the constant factor in the whole process of moving from wing-up to wing-down. Aerodynamically speaking, it’s the fuselage which moves back to the wing and not the other way around.

    So the idea of the ‘wing ripping off’ due to an unhealthy AoA is not really likely. A wing stall is of course possible, but i don’t know of any such incidents – the aircraft would have had too little airspeed in such cases anyway.

    in reply to: Crusader's wing #2092207
    Arthur
    Participant

    RE: Crusader’s wing

    [updated:LAST EDITED ON 13-02-03 AT 07:20 PM (GMT)]I never knew of Phantoms phlying with their outer wing panels pholded. Wouldn’t surprise me though. However, the Crusader has quite a number of logged takeoffs and landings with the outer wing panels up – i think they should be somewhere in the archives on AFM, i remember typing something about that a few months back.

    As for the AoA-adjustable wing: this was controlled by a separate lever in the cockpit (or actually two: the handle itself and a separate locking handle), hence functioned independently from the landing gear. So a flight with gears up and wing out is possible, although i think it was only common right after take-off. The only pic i could find of a Crusader in that configuration seems to be just that. Interestingly, the wing was not crancked up for other cases in which the Crusader had to fly really slow, for example when being refuelled by a slow bug like the AJ-2 Savage or KC-130.

    This pic’s from Wings of Fame vol. 5, showing an RF-8G with VFP-63.

    http://us.f1.yahoofs.com/groups/g_1338143/RF-8G+with+wing+out.jpg?bcfO_…

    Edit: i couldn’t get the image uploaded (…again… do i owe anyone some pictures still, btw?), so i rerouted it via Yahoo.

    in reply to: Mildenhall Cancelled #2092217
    Arthur
    Participant

    RE: Mildenhall Cancelled

    &l; smartass mode &r;
    Because Lakenheath is really close to Mildenhall.
    &l; /smartass mode &r;

    in reply to: General Discussion #379927
    Arthur
    Participant

    RE: Increased security at London Heathrow.

    I don’t think the WTC would have been saved if there were light tanks patrolling there, or at the airports where the planes took off.

    It seems like a nasty, nasti spin to me. I guess the old Kennedy motto “We have nothing to fear but fear itself” is finally said goodbye. After all, we have to fear in order to agree with what certain governments are proposing.

    These are scary times. I’m just not sure if it’s a terrorist threat, or the ‘democratic’ governments i have to be afraid of.

    in reply to: Increased security at London Heathrow. #1962970
    Arthur
    Participant

    RE: Increased security at London Heathrow.

    I don’t think the WTC would have been saved if there were light tanks patrolling there, or at the airports where the planes took off.

    It seems like a nasty, nasti spin to me. I guess the old Kennedy motto “We have nothing to fear but fear itself” is finally said goodbye. After all, we have to fear in order to agree with what certain governments are proposing.

    These are scary times. I’m just not sure if it’s a terrorist threat, or the ‘democratic’ governments i have to be afraid of.

    in reply to: General Discussion #380682
    Arthur
    Participant

    RE: Geforce…..sigh…….

    Well, what Gefore is right about it that the European population is generally against a unilateral US attack on Iraq.

    But it seems he got a bit upset about it for some reason, perhaps he’s too young to be suitably cynical 😀

    Funny thought which crossed my mind today:
    Saddam grew his bio-warfare germs in the incubators his army stole from Kuwait.

    }>

    It would be fun though – reviving an old lie to produce a new one.

    in reply to: SCREW NATO — Old Europe responds #1963418
    Arthur
    Participant

    RE: Geforce…..sigh…….

    Well, what Gefore is right about it that the European population is generally against a unilateral US attack on Iraq.

    But it seems he got a bit upset about it for some reason, perhaps he’s too young to be suitably cynical 😀

    Funny thought which crossed my mind today:
    Saddam grew his bio-warfare germs in the incubators his army stole from Kuwait.

    }>

    It would be fun though – reviving an old lie to produce a new one.

    in reply to: General Discussion #380713
    Arthur
    Participant

    RE: 9 Aircraft Carriers to Gulf?

    Bad news is that some of those carriers will be equipped with Subpar Hornets. Ah well, the Euphrates and Tigris are large rivers so i guess it will be possible to reach out and touch Baghdad from a F/A-18E/F carrier after all… }>

    in reply to: 9 Aircraft Carriers to Gulf? #1963438
    Arthur
    Participant

    RE: 9 Aircraft Carriers to Gulf?

    Bad news is that some of those carriers will be equipped with Subpar Hornets. Ah well, the Euphrates and Tigris are large rivers so i guess it will be possible to reach out and touch Baghdad from a F/A-18E/F carrier after all… }>

    in reply to: General Discussion #380749
    Arthur
    Participant

    RE: war in Irak and the Franco/German resistance

    Great link, Icarus!

    And be sure to thank the French for Dimona and your *ahem*
    indigenous Jericho missiles.

    Yes, France has got quite a history of vague arms deals. Sometimes they are called Nesher.

    in reply to: war in Irak and the Franco/German resistance #1963466
    Arthur
    Participant

    RE: war in Irak and the Franco/German resistance

    Great link, Icarus!

    And be sure to thank the French for Dimona and your *ahem*
    indigenous Jericho missiles.

    Yes, France has got quite a history of vague arms deals. Sometimes they are called Nesher.

Viewing 15 posts - 5,971 through 5,985 (of 6,424 total)