dark light

Arthur

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 6,424 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Joint Future Theater Lift Study — C-130 replacement #2380977
    Arthur
    Participant

    Ah, so you’re just one of the “few built=it must be crap” school of thinking then? Unable to look at design or engineering features, only at production numbers or sales.

    I’ll keep that in mind.

    in reply to: Joint Future Theater Lift Study — C-130 replacement #2381425
    Arthur
    Participant

    1 BR940 prototype, and 1 BR941 prototype.

    4… yes FOUR “production” examples built… to go along with the prototypes.

    Such a successful aircraft! All of 6 built… the French Air Force must have been overwhelmed by so many being delivered!

    Suffering from NIH-syndrome, Bager? McDonnell-Douglas was so impressed by the Br941 that they tried to market the design as their own. Ever heard of the MDD 188?
    http://aerostories.free.fr/appareils/Br941/Br941eastern.JPG

    There was significant practical interest for the 941 from the USAF, although the direct need for it went away when they took over the Army’s C-7s in 1967 and still later the AF realised how little it wants to do with mud and dirt.

    in reply to: Turrets for fighters #2381438
    Arthur
    Participant

    Tried on the B-57G Pave Gat as well. It wasn’t satisfactory enough for South East Asia, so I doubt it would be now.

    I can’t think of a suitable present day airframe, to be honest.

    Video:
    http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=7d0_1287303302

    Of course, the Soviets played around with gun traverse on air-to-air fighters, prime example being the MiG-17SN.

    in reply to: Joint Future Theater Lift Study — C-130 replacement #2383327
    Arthur
    Participant

    Wide-bodied up-engined YC-14, with lots of dangly things on leading and trailing edges for carrier and STOL-ops optional.

    Finally they are realising the Jerkules is a Jeep-transporter in a Humvee-military.

    in reply to: Israeli Air Force power projection post 2020 #2388044
    Arthur
    Participant

    I think its time to discuss Israel as an emerging regional super power in the coming years. I am Loathe to mention a weapons system I will simply call the F-X for fear that a certain moderator from the Netherlands will lock this.

    Either you openly point out what you want to discuss, or you shut up. Unless you want this thread closed by a certain moderator from Belgium, the UK or the US.

    2. Will the IAF be able to threaten Tehran in Iran or Pakistan?

    I think they are able to threaten Tehran in Iran. I don’t know about Tehran in Pakistan, but I’m sure the mossad will find some British tourists if the need arises.

    in reply to: Yugoslavian F-84s and F-86s #1158344
    Arthur
    Participant

    Romania built the Alouette III, Puma, Islander and BAC111 in license, and they were even in the Warsaw Pact.

    Yugoslavia was a communist country, but they were not a member of the Warsaw Pact and most certainly weren’t part of the Soviet block. They were free to buy their equipment on the world market. IIRC their Sabres were mostly ex-RAF Canadair Sabres (called F-86E in service) apart from a number of radar-equipped F-86D’s.

    Their F-84F Thunderjets were ex-USAF (48TFW) and new-built.

    in reply to: The Rafales radar Not good enough for the UAE? #2414530
    Arthur
    Participant

    Thread closed, as it’s already discussed in the Rafale News-thread. Original poster also suspect of trolling.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force – News And Discussion #14 #2420654
    Arthur
    Participant

    …and it comprises the Sarang acrobatic team (one of the only 3 globally).

    Sigh…

    There are currently 7 official helicopter display teams in the world. Apart from team Sarang there are:
    Blue Eagles – AAC, Lynx
    Black Cats – RN, Lynx
    Grupa Akrobacyjna Skorpion – Poland, Mi-24
    Rotores de Portugal – Portugal, Alouette III
    Patrulla Aspa – Spain, EC120
    Berkuty – Russia, Mi-24
    I don’t know the status of the JGSDF helicopter teams, but they used to have two OH-6J teams, and one flying the AH-1.

    And not too long ago, there were the Dutch Grasshoppers (Alouette III), the Belgian Blue Bees (Alouette II), a Swedish team with Hkp5’s (or Schweizer/Hughes 300s if you will). Never mind the one-season display teams formed by individual units throughout the years (like the Swiss Puma’s).

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Часть 3! #2420868
    Arthur
    Participant

    There’s an impressive line up of TU-22 Blinders in this video at 1:48. Any ideas where this is? Also, were the engines of the Blinder always that smokey?

    It’s the Blinder-cemetary at Engels. A very, very impressive sight that was. I really can’t tell you about the smokiness of the engines – I’ve never had the fortune of seeing one fly, alas.

    Can’t find the original photo of my avatar, unfortunately. It’s on the net, somewhere…

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Часть 3! #2421031
    Arthur
    Participant

    Are those the “Blinders”?

    I’ve read in Aircraft Monthly Magazine that the remaining sq are retired by now.. happend earlier this year..:(

    All part of the re-structuring and re-armament of RuAF.

    Russia’s Blinders were all gone by 1995. The picture Otaku posted shows a glorious line of preserved beauties at Engels. Unfortunately it’s a mere shadow of the glorious pile of 93 Tu-22s I saw there in 1996…

    Ukraine flew it’s Blinders until 1997 or 1998. Lybia probably stopped flying them in the mid-1990s. So they have all been retired quite a bit longer ago than earlier this year.

    Still, an absolutely gorgeous bomber!
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tdCEJa-vo3Y
    Watch the flypast at 0:44…

    in reply to: Lynx helicopters in Iraqi AF #2423452
    Arthur
    Participant

    No.

    The police in Qatar used to have a handful of ’em though.

    Arthur
    Participant

    Thread closed. Enough F-35 threads already, there is no reason to turn this forum into an F-35-shrine no matter how much some devotee’s would like that.

    in reply to: underestimating U.S. air power. #2377438
    Arthur
    Participant

    …which brought this thread with it’s borderline trollish opening statement to a perfectly useless political ending. Thread closed, attempts at continuing this non-discussion will result in moderator-induced repercussions.

    in reply to: underestimating U.S. air power. #2377491
    Arthur
    Participant

    Actually, the deal Serbia got after Allied Farce was a far better one than the deal on the table at Rambouillet. The Rambouillet proposal was for all of Serbia to become under UN jurisdiction, making Serbia de facto without sovereignty.

    After Allied Farce, only Kosovo got under UN jurisdiction.

    in reply to: Pakistan Air Force III #2379174
    Arthur
    Participant

    Your children look exactly like you!

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 6,424 total)