Appears to be in China?
Pics courtesy of Saeed Khan at pakistanidefence.com;
Some interesting pics of Red Flag at F16.net;
http://www.f-16.net/f-16_forum_viewtopic-t-13996-postdays-0-postorder-asc-start-45.html
Pics courtesy of Saeed Khan at pakistanidefence.com;
Red flag pics;
Red Flag pics;
I prefer the F-16A/B camouflage of the PAF to the new F-16 C/D Block 52’s camouflage scheme thanks to the different gray colour of the radome..the new F-16 C/Ds with radomes that match the light gray don’t look quite as good as these older F-16A/Bs.
I know what you mean, nothing quite beats the clean lines of the classic pre-Block-50/52 version of the viper. Although highly capable, the later Block versions don’t look as pretty with the big spine D version, CFTs, and other bits and pieces sticking out.
Second Il-78 tanker for PAF?
some video footage of PAF F16s refuelling at Nellis
An interesting view of the Pyotri Veliky, especially the 3D animation and internal panoramic views π
More and more aircraft are being fitted with Enhanced GPWS, which combines the benefits of GPWS with a terrain database – amongst other things.
Couple of interesting links:
http://www51.honeywell.com/aero/common/documents/Terrain_Clearance_Floor.pdf
http://www51.honeywell.com/aero/common/documents/Peaks-Terrain-Display.pdf
http://www51.honeywell.com/aero/common/documents/Mode_2_-_Excessive_Terrain_Closure_Rate.avi
http://www51.honeywell.com/aero/common/documents/Terrain_Display.avi
Thanks for these details, but from what I can understand, these systems seem to use radio transmissions and pre-configured terrain data.
I guess what I’m trying to get at, is the possibility to install some form of multi-mode radar in the nose sections of airliners, which can provide both air-to-air and air-to-ground data, similar to the multi-mode radar in fighters.
Don’t get me wrong, I’m not for one minute advocating the installation of military spec radars in the noses of airliners, that would be overkill. But at least have some form of radar which can provide live data to avoid both mid-air and ground collisions. It doesn’t have to be long range such as BVR capable radars in fighters, and obviously it will require some form of international standardization on frequencies and codes to avoid being identified as a military signature. Given the unit cost of airliners, I don’t think it would add a significant cost over and above the price of current airliners.
Most do, although it is strictly speaking an optional extra, but most airlines opt for it. It’s called Ground Proximity Warning System, GPWS for short.
Problem is, sometimes the mountain is too high and airspeed too low to avoid collision by the time the GPWS calls out its “Terrain Terrain, Pull up” warning.
Thanks for the info. Could these not be improved by extending their range and perhaps bringing them close to the standard of military terrain scanning radar capabilities?
Very sad news indeed, my condolences and thoughts with the families who passed away, may they rest in peace π
I donβt know too much regarding civil airline procedures, so please forgive my ignorance. Would it be possible to have collision avoiding radar to be installed on airliners? I think most of the large airliners have weather radar in their nose? Could this not be updated to also include some form of forward terrain scanning radar as well?
Thats how you close the canopy!
and few more shots.
Great pics Buran, thanks for uploading π Nice to see the fine details.
Your children look exactly like you!
lmao π