dark light

Rookh

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 421 through 435 (of 527 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Pakistan Air Force III #2379471
    Rookh
    Participant

    Hi Guys, I wonder what is the latest news/status on the MAR-1 anti radiation missiles boiught by Pakistan from Mectron in Brazil…

    Can anyone here help me understand the evolution of this deal?

    Regards,

    HAmmer

    Hammer, I think you will probably have a better understanding about this 🙂 Not much in the way of details from the PAF since the news of the deal was revealed, which did come as a surprise. Any details from the Brazilian side on the specs of the missile? Also, any details on its use by the Brazilian Air Force?

    in reply to: Pakistan Air Force III #2379503
    Rookh
    Participant
    in reply to: Pakistan Air Force III #2379816
    Rookh
    Participant

    JF-17s head back home, the RD93s are as smokey as ever 🙂

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mJC8v44t_qM

    in reply to: Pakistan Air Force III #2379824
    Rookh
    Participant

    Some Red Flag pics, courtesy of Saeed Khan at pakistanidefence.com.

    in reply to: Pakistan Air Force III #2379860
    Rookh
    Participant
    in reply to: Military Aviation News from around the world – V #2383388
    Rookh
    Participant

    (Quoted posting was removed by a moderator)

    Are you serious?

    in reply to: Pakistan Air Force III #2384495
    Rookh
    Participant

    Photos courtesy of Saeed Khan from pakistanidefence.com;

    in reply to: Pakistan Air Force III #2384730
    Rookh
    Participant

    did PAF make any statement on the issue of the air show at all in the last few weeks ? it’s usual for at least one press conference to precede an event like this.

    The PAF made the request to Farnborough for a static display. This is what I was told by Sara Fulton, Flight Operations Manager for Farn’ 10;

    http://www.farnborough.com/Site/Content/Farnborough2010/Contacts.aspx?Z=199

    p.s. is the high commissioner a political appointee or a politician ? isn’t he a career diplomat ? in the later case one can expect a certain level of reliability.

    Not really. Given the levels of nepotism in the current political regime, I very much doubt the reliability in most of the consular operations of Pak High Comm, even more than usual.

    in reply to: Best COIN aircraft of all time #2384739
    Rookh
    Participant

    The problem with trying to determine ‘the best’ COIN aircraft is the relatively recent development of COIN warfare in built up urban terrain. I personally don’t believe one specific platform can provide ‘the best’ or most appropriate platform for COIN warfare.

    For example, rotary wing platforms are too slow and vulnerable to well equipped insurgents with MANPADS and even RPGs. In these cases, it’s probably more appropriate to use faster fixed winged platforms such as the A-10. However, the problem with fixed winged types is their poor low speed performance. Armed UAVS are probably the best compromise between the two, but the current platforms don’t offer the same level of firepower over the dedicated ground attack types.

    I think a combination of three types is probably the most suitable, i.e. rotary platforms to provide low level persistent local area coverage, faster and higher fixed winged types for rapid reaction and armed UAVs for wide area surveillance and opportunistic targeting.

    in reply to: Pakistan Air Force III #2384922
    Rookh
    Participant

    I wouldn’t give that much credit to any Pakistani political element, especially given the current regime. The only way to know the reasons for the change in display would be to ask the PAF. There hasn’t been any further details yet, as far as I know anyway.

    in reply to: Best COIN aircraft of all time #2385205
    Rookh
    Participant

    How would one define a COIN aircraft from a general ground attack aircraft/helicopter that have been described so far in this thread?

    in reply to: Pakistan Air Force III #2385260
    Rookh
    Participant

    http://www.app.com.pk/en_/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=109940&Itemid=2

    PAF Chief says no problems in acquiring engines for JF-17 aircraft

    FARNBOROUGH, July 21 (APP)-Pakistan Air Force Chief Air Chief Marshal Rao Qamar Suleman has rubbished claims that production of JF-17 Thunder warplanes has been hit by problems relating to procurement of Russian engines and said the manufacturing of the fighter planes in joint collaboration with China was proceeding smoothly. The Air Chief was speaking to media on the occasion of his visit to Farnborough International Air Show where two PAF JF-17 aircraft are on static display. “There are no problems whatsoever regarding the supply of engines for these aircraft contrary what has been appearing in the international media,” he asserted.

    The Air Chief who visited the site where two PAF planes are on display and met the pilots and the ground staff, said he has been encouraged by the positive response of friendly countries who have shown interest in the aircraft. He said both Pakistan and China have evolved a joint strategy to sell these planes to the interested countries.

    The President of China Aviation Technology Import and Export Corporation (CATIC), Li Yu Hai who was also present on the occasion categorically stated that they have received no information from Russia on suspending the further supply of 100 RD-93 engines.

    The Pakistani Air Force chief added that China has also manufactured engines for this aircraft which are currently under testing and trials.
    “We have to see how far these engines are successfully and then possibly induct them into JF-17”.

    He said Pakistan was looking to manufacture around 250 of these aircraft to replacing its present fleet of A-5s, FP-7 and Mirages. According to Jane’s Defence Weekly, Egypt has launched negotiations with Pakistan in relation to licensed production of these single engine multimode fighter aircraft.

    According to the magazine, the Russian defence manufacturers are facing strong competition from China vis-à-vis their MIG-29s which carry a price tag of US $ 35 million as compared to 10 million dollars for FC-1 fighters. The magazine said MIG-29s are currently competing with FC-1s in an Egyptian tender on the delivery of 32 fighters while the Middle East country is also negotiating with Pakistan.

    The Russian Federal Service for Military Technical Co-operation approved re-export of RD-93 engines to Egypt as part of the FC-1 fighter package in November 2007. While the PAF chief was visiting static display of JF-17, overhead an array of latest Western fighter planes including the state-of-the-art F-22 Raptor, F-16, F-18, Euro fighter Typhoon, British-made Hawke trainer thrilled the crowd with their aeronautical characteristics during the flying display. Pakistan plans to fly the JF-17 planes at the next 2012 show. In the meantime, these planes will also participate in the Singapore International Air Show next year.

    The Commander of the Saudi Arabian Dharan Airbase also visited the site and evinced keen interest in JF-17. As he sat in the cockpit he was explained about its various features by wing commander Khalid who flew one of the planes from Pakistan. The PAF Chief also sat in the cockpit. Air Vice Marshal Muhammad Arif. Project, Director, of JF-17 was also present on the occasion.

    Both Pakistan and China have set up a joint stall at the main exhibition hall and has been receiving numerous enquiries regarding the aircraft which has put on display for the first time at an international air show. The Pakistan Air Force officially inducted its first JF-17 squadron on February 18 this year.

    The JF-17 aircraft will be produced in blocks of 50 aircraft each where every succeeding block would be an upgraded version of the preceding block. Pakistan ’s share in co-production of the airframe of JF-17 aircraft would be more than 50%. Pakistan Aeronautical Complex, Kamra, has the capacity to roll-out 15-25 aircraft per year.

    in reply to: Pakistan Air Force III #2385501
    Rookh
    Participant

    but didn’t people here who are said to be in the know assure us that there was going to be a flying display even a week before the show ? assuming they were correct, what changed in that short period ?

    Not sure who or what you’re referring to. It was originally advertised on the Farnborough site for a flying display, but PAF requested for a static display instead, not sure why.

    in reply to: Pakistan Air Force III #2385518
    Rookh
    Participant

    PAF or CATIC, don’t know which couldn’t afford the insurance cover it seems. So no flying display.

    There’s nothing to support the suggestion it had anything to do with insurance. Farnborough have made it clear that the static display was at the REQUEST of the PAF.

    in reply to: Pakistan Air Force III #2385656
    Rookh
    Participant
Viewing 15 posts - 421 through 435 (of 527 total)