What about all the British and French jet engines used in American aircraft post-war?
You could also argue that Russian jet engine technology is entirely due to us Brits handing over examples of Rolls Royce engines to the Russians…what was it that Stalin said…
“What fool will sell us his secrets?”
LOL…..No matter how Chinese spin things. A copy is a copy even if it is just an airframe. You would be sued if both the companies were in same country. Because the one who designed it first would have spent millions of dollars designing basic airframe.
Can somebody post any source that states insides of Chinese “Flanker” are different from Russian “Flanker”.
Yep. How dare anyone question if the mighty Chinese aviation complex (known for ALL those world class platforms) can replicate and supersede EVERY SINGLE performance characteristic of the plane it ripped-off. What an unreasonable point to bring up.
Whatever. At least I don’t live in denial.
That reminds me…
![]()
![]()
😉
Quadbike, the IN eventually getting the F35C may be be a possibility, but that doesn’t mean it’s confirmed, certainly not at this early stage, which is what you keep on saying. Considering the length of time we are talking about here, anything could change, delays in the IAC, shifting IN requirements, geopolitics, the JSF members fulfilling their own orders first…etc, etc…just too many factors at the moment.
So according to your logic…
Tell that to LM who has responded with F 35 B and C with the INs RFI for the next gen fighter. The RFI was sent to MIG, Dassault, SAAB, Boeing & Eurofighter. Only people living in the 1980s cannot see IN operating F35s soon.
…means…
Why worry when we are getting F 35 C on our next carrier. 😉
Okkaaaay…whatever floats your boat dude, if only every indian RFI worked that efficiently! :rolleyes:
Its on offer for the Indian Navy. And Pakistan will never be offered the F 35 anyway 🙂
WTF?! Who mentioned anything about Pakistan?! How sad, pathetic and immature! If you feel the need to denigrate another country to relieve your body functions, so be it. No need for me to burst your wet dream, I’m sure the indian carriers will be on budget, on time and according to expectations…just like virtually every other indian defence project. Moreover, I’m sure the world will stay static for you and global political trends will continue as they, not to mention the indian MoD becoming more efficient and timely when ordering defence equipment.
If you are referring to the Royal Navy, then yes the F35C decision was part of the SDSR, along with the decision to go with electromagnetic catapults and arrestors on the CVF from the new American CVN. That said, it has been fairly obvious the RN was going to ditch F35B for quite a while, the only question really was what they were going to choose instead!
No I wasn’t referring to the RN, I was referring to quadbike’s allegation that the indian navy will get the F35 C on their next carrier…which is stretching it, to say the least.
I’m aware of the SDSR, EMALS and our opting for the C model. Quite frankly, I’m not really sure why we ever even considered the B model, setting aside the economic downturn and funding issues, the C model was always going to provide greater efficiency between the RAF and RN, similar to the Phantom.
Why worry when we are getting F 35 C on our next carrier. 😉
Is that confirmed or wishful thinking?
Very interesting! Thanks Jawad. That setup reminds me of the BGM-109G land based Tomahawk system;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BGM-109G_Ground_Launched_Cruise_Missile
Also, it may be possible that it’s a dual use system, I’m sure that enclosure could be transferred to a naval system, possibly the additional F-22Ps on order or any future PN vessel?
Thanks for the pics. They’ve gone back to using the box type VLS launcher, from the previous cylinder type VLS launcher. Possible SLCM and land based varients perhaps?
Check the 1 attachment. Seem to have dual bomb rack in the center fuselage pylon :
Very interesting, thanks for those. I think that last pic must be the first one I’ve seen where all 4 fuselage hardpoints are occupied (5 if you count the centre line tank as well).
I’ll repeat what I said for the synaptically challenged…
I was being fecetious…twin fins, wide spaced podded engines, central lifting body fuselage, large radar, long range missile…
Tomcat ? How is the Su 27 an exact copy of that ? It don’t even look similar 🙂
I was being fecetious…twin fins, wide spaced podded engines, central lifting body fuselage, large radar, long range missile…
knock-off Su-27K.. oh. wait..
F-14 Tomcat rip-off…oh wait…
Dooh, read my post again.:(
The MKI did very good vs all Teens in Red Flag 2008.
While we will never know the exact outcome of those BFM manuveres that took place over at Mountain Home and Nelis. It is clear the MKI was matched with and against both the F-16 and F-15C.
My point beeing, the MKI is a twin seater with the extra drag, so how come it perform so great against singel crew jets like F-16 and F-15C?
Answer: If we take the US pilot statement, those Su-27UB imported from Ukraine, he says the UB has a very similar feel and is performing equal or better than F-15C. So the extra drag cant be that significant.
So there goes your ‘High drag’ out the window.:rolleyes:
Read my post again…what parameters are you basing those statements on?
As I tried to imply, the extra drag of the high stepped tandem seating arrangement is offset by high thrust engines (which require the extra internal fuel capability), and TVC controls for greater turning agility. Go look up the range of the SU-30MKK and compare with the SU-30MKI, see what difference even canards can make in terms of drag.