dark light

Aurel

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 256 through 270 (of 939 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Should the UK dump the F-35? #2350136
    Aurel
    Participant

    There is no training gap. For CATOBAR operations the pilots would have to be trained nearly from ground up anyway.
    I think that is charme of this solution.

    What means is this foe using to find targets? Is it flying passively, hoping to find the CBG?
    Once a foe has a demonstrated capability of regularly detecting LPI emissions, then we can discuss the merits of stealth/non-stealth. Of course you conveniently neglected to mention that a non-stealthy platform would also emit. You also conveniently ignored NCW, where F-35s received sensor information from a variety of sources, not to mention the EOTS system.

    There are several options. Stealthy UAV’s, submarines, satellites,… An aircraft carrier isn’t exactly a small ship.

    The whole point of those carrie(s) was to give aircover and CAS to the Royal Marines.
    The F-35 outperforms in my opinion any other available contender in this role.

    Still the question has to be asked, if it is a good idea to attack said enemy. If not, then there is no point to pay a premium for stealth.

    The much cheaper SH can bomb som mudhuds in some forsaken place just fine. For nearly half the price.
    And as I already wrote, for defending a big fat target I believe stealth isnt’t all that useful, if you want to maximise the probablitiy of an intercept.

    in reply to: Should the UK dump the F-35? #2350666
    Aurel
    Participant

    The F-35C is perfectly suited to perform the Fleet Defense Role. Especially, with its Stealth, Sensor Fusion, and Long Range.;)

    Can you stop that bull**** ? Stealth means jack if you are emitting yourself. Of course you can stay stealthy, and your wonderful fat bomber won’t be harmed by an enemy. Unfortunately if said enemy hast anything stealthy as well, (Be it missiles or aircraft) the fat goose better has an enormous range, since it has to find another place for landing.

    in reply to: Should the UK dump the F-35? #2350961
    Aurel
    Participant

    There is a good reason why the Royal Navy wants the JSF for it’s carriers. They are an offensive weapon and as such stealth is a wonderful thing to have.

    In the unlikely case the F-35 get’s axed, I would bet the SH get’s additional orders. Only happens if the Chinese stop buying US bonds and by that have to write off their current investment.

    In my opinion the perfect solution would be if the French buy the British surplus carrier in exchange for a Rafale order. Maybe some additonal stuff to make up for the price difference. (UK Paveway IV, Brimstone, whatever…)

    in reply to: MMRCA News And Discussion 6 #2327097
    Aurel
    Participant

    Scooter, your reponses are pure BS. India alway operated a mix between western and russian aircraft. The Russians don’t lose market share.
    The T-50 will be the future backbone of the IAF fleet and atm they are delivering Sukhois from Irkut and MiG’s from Sokol.
    If anyone is on the losing side, it’s Western Europe, since U.S. companies are replacing them as suppliers of Western kit in the traditional fleetmix.

    Su-30 –> T-50

    Jaguar–> AMCA

    M2k –> ?

    And with the decision to go for the F-414, it would be quite strange to pick anything else then the Shornet as MRCA. Yes, no Gripen since this aircraft steps on the toes of the LCA.

    in reply to: The future of the European fighter industry. #2336450
    Aurel
    Participant

    Certainly the most interesting post of that thread.
    Well, you have certainly a very interesting point here, but honestly, do you think that those with the political power in Europe now are mature enough to go ahead ?
    For quite some time, the only achievement of Europe are only about economic matters.

    We are still demokratic. At least on paper. And I can’t think of any country in Europe with a majority that wants more power for the nameless burocrats in Bruxelles.

    To stay on topic. European airframers will survive only as subcontractors of US companies and with niche products.

    in reply to: MMRCA News And Discussion V #2357100
    Aurel
    Participant

    If the IAF want to try suicidal missions then the best chances for them striking deap into northern territories would be with something like the Rafale.

    :p

    in reply to: MMRCA News And Discussion V #2357133
    Aurel
    Participant

    Would be interesting to see which weapon package is included in the M2K upgrade. With a huge package of modern weapons this could be a strong selling point for Rafales.
    As weapon systems Rafale, Shornet and MiG’s fit best into the picture. All of them have carrier variants, and Rafales and MiGs are able to use existing weapons.
    Rafale and Shornet are potent strike aircraft with decent EW capabilities, the MiG makes this up with it’s low price.

    Tiffy, Gripen and the Teens come with weapons mostly useless for any other Indian aircraft.
    Is there anything else then Paveway II’s qualified on any IAF type ?

    And where does this rumor come frome Gripen is integrated with MICA ? I’ve seen the claim on several sites, but no evidence so far.

    in reply to: Fictional thread. Follow up from 'Your COIN Airforce' #2359159
    Aurel
    Participant

    Well, earlier examples were quite cheap, while the latest examples pretty much doubled in price.
    But to be fair, they have serveral improvements over early models.

    in reply to: Fictional thread. Follow up from 'Your COIN Airforce' #2359258
    Aurel
    Participant

    Rather surprised that nobody has suggested the Su-30MKI/Brahmos combination for air sovereignty/anti-shipping defense.

    Well, they are not that cheap to buy and to run. Plus the major thread has quite a bit knowledge about the Sukhoi.

    in reply to: Fictional thread. Follow up from 'Your COIN Airforce' #2359628
    Aurel
    Participant

    Even if they come with the capabilties of the austere package there is this obvious absence of integrated AShM’s.

    in reply to: Fictional thread. Follow up from 'Your COIN Airforce' #2359755
    Aurel
    Participant

    Italy offered 24 T1 Tiffies to Romania for $1bill . But buying them and keeping them operational is quite a difference, and they are more or less one trick ponies.

    An other option I though about was getting some SAM’s + ex-British Type 23’s. But then again I don’t know how many will be made available for exports.

    BMP 3’s to replace all that light armor junk + SAMs + some Leo II’s /Chally II’s.

    in reply to: Fictional thread. Follow up from 'Your COIN Airforce' #2360478
    Aurel
    Participant

    True, the fully armed Visby is fiction, just like Durango. 😀

    in reply to: Fictional thread. Follow up from 'Your COIN Airforce' #2360489
    Aurel
    Participant

    RBS 15 just like the Gripens and those wonderful Sisu trucks.

    in reply to: Fictional thread. Follow up from 'Your COIN Airforce' #2360574
    Aurel
    Participant

    Army

    8 brigades
    2 armoured – PT-76B/2S9/Scorpion/Saladin
    5 Infanty – 3 mechanised, BTR-60, BMP-1, Saxon; 2 motorised;
    1 Air Assault Bttn
    1 independent artillery – D-30/RM-70 + 1 batt. RBS-15 (truck mounted)
    2 Coastal Defence battalions – 4 batteries each Rubezh/P-15, M-46
    2 regiments Tor M1 & S300 PMU-1 each

    Airforce

    12 MiG-23BN ->replaced with 12 second hand JAS 39 upgraded to C-models
    9 L-39
    6 An-26
    4 Shorts 330UTT
    6 Mi-14
    24 Mi-8

    Navy

    2 Pr.1159TR Koni class FF
    3 Osa-II FAC(M) + 2 Visby class corvettes
    5 Stenka class FAC/ASW
    5 Castle class OPV(H)

    Breaking a sea blockade isn’t possible with 2 bill imo, so I focused on peacetime patrol of EEZ and deterrent against any invasion.

    in reply to: The Dawn of a new era…UK/France military cooperation #2380483
    Aurel
    Participant

    Think this will lead to more efficient development and procurement programmes for Europe as a whole.
    For the future of military aircraft in Europe, I think the future is much clearer now.
    BAE Systems will be the leader for this whole MALE/HALE stuff with Mantis and derivatives.
    Same for UCAV’s with Dassault’s Neuron.

Viewing 15 posts - 256 through 270 (of 939 total)