dark light

Aurel

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 406 through 420 (of 939 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: F-22 export not likely……….. #2456281
    Aurel
    Participant

    If they want a 5th generation fighter, they have no other choice then to go for the F-35. Maybe Japan even buys LRIP airframes, to get them soon enough.
    The Japanese Phantoms aren’t that old. I think the youngest airframes were build as late as the early 90’s. I guess they could afford to wait for the JSF.

    in reply to: A400M delay has RAF concerned #2465954
    Aurel
    Participant

    Are the progress engines in line with noise regulations ? Just a specultation, since the counter rotating engines of the Bear are quite loud.

    in reply to: UK to retire Harrier force. #2468599
    Aurel
    Participant

    You mean the same paper that lists 12 type 45 destroyers ? The same paper, that further lists the cut to 9 under equipment options ?

    in reply to: UK to retire Harrier force. #2468612
    Aurel
    Participant

    CVF, as has been explained more than once, is NOT A FLEET CARRIER. Get it?. If you cant get that through your head go and read up on what the UK Carrier Strike mission is and think on the sense of it for a while.

    Exactly. It is a oversized helo carrier. What can it do LHD’s can’t ?

    It can’t launch F-35C. You know, the model with the long range.
    The CVF design (or ordered layout) trades a higher sortie rate and maybe some easier training for the ability of it’s airgroup to perform deep strikes.
    In your opinion this is a great idea, I beg to differ.

    in reply to: UK to retire Harrier force. #2469069
    Aurel
    Participant

    The tornados are taking over as the harriers are rotated out of theatre, not due to any capability issue.

    They have no capability issue, sure. But it shows the Tornado can take over the job.

    My point is you have either a capable enemy where you would want more the kind of a fleet carrier (E-2, F-35B, CATOBAR, more escorts), or you have an inferior opponent where a smaller carrier or LHD would be sufficient.

    You certainly knew this would come:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6h8i8wrajA
    Frightening close to reality.

    in reply to: UK to retire Harrier force. #2469105
    Aurel
    Participant

    Just as addition: the Harriers do at the moment the job a Jaguar or Bucc would be wonderful suited for. Tornadoes will take over that job soon.
    And the royal navy is tasked with the following:
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/nov/19/piracy-somalia-eu-operation-atalanta

    in reply to: UK to retire Harrier force. #2469107
    Aurel
    Participant

    Being ironic is no substitute for a detailed answer. :rolleyes:

    Such as yours ?

    Well that is pretty much what the UK’s 1998 SDR says so actually it does seem like a great investment.

    1998 the MoD had obviously more money. Since then the surfacefleet has been cut in numbers, and other programmes are deep in trouble.
    60kt helicopter carriers are a luxury in my opinion. What do they offer over a Wasp or Cavour ?
    Which enemy (that couldn’t do anything against your 3 1/2 escorts) would require the extra sorties you get from your oversized “through deck cruiser” ?

    The potential to be fitted with catapults is great, but won’t turn B-model JSF into C-models, to explore the full potential of that change.

    Given the financial situation I think it is not the best decision to go on with the project in it’s current shape.

    You know that comedy with the reporter and the admiral ? “It’s 60.000 tons…”

    in reply to: UK to retire Harrier force. #2469140
    Aurel
    Participant

    Ah, so you have no enemy your 3 1/2 escorts can’t kill, but you need 60kt carriers ? Oh I forgot, they only serve the purpose of throwing money you don’t have (in shape of PGM’s) on some mud huts.
    From that perspective it looks like a good investment, indeed. :p

    in reply to: UK to retire Harrier force. #2469165
    Aurel
    Participant

    What use is a carrier force, if you can’t efford enough escorts for it ? The UK military has only the purpose to support US forces anyway, so some more LPD’s would do the job as well.

    in reply to: UK to retire Harrier force. #2470502
    Aurel
    Participant

    How about that: The UK has no money for aircraft, the French no money for carriers. Now put this together, and you get British carriers with French airgroup.

    in reply to: Rafale News V #2472970
    Aurel
    Participant

    India and Brazil are for me the most likely candidates. I couln’t imagine an aircraft that is better suited for the Indian needs. (Well, more M2K…:diablo:)

    in reply to: Norwegian Government select JSF #2476154
    Aurel
    Participant

    Well I don’t think they should buy the Gripen. They got the money, and if they want JSF, they should buy JSF.
    But they should at least compensate Saab a bit for the afford in this “competition”.

    in reply to: Norwegian Government select JSF #2478176
    Aurel
    Participant

    There seems to be a fair amount of speculation and some accusations in this thread. People are free to think and say almost whatever they want, of course, but I don’t see why some people have the need to come up with unfounded accusations.

    Internal and external evaluations confirm that the F-35 is the only aircraft which meets the requirements set by Norway. RNoAF fighter pilots seem to be very pleased with the choice. I trust these people. Blame me as much as you want.

    It is not about the decsison to go for JSF. It is about the numbers the Norwegian MOD came up.
    Let’s just wait for the 4th december debrief. Maybe we get some answers then.

    in reply to: He is back! He is angry! Rafale News Four! #2478208
    Aurel
    Participant

    On current firm contracts, well before the Swiss plan to induct the new jets, there’s 5 nations flying 160+ jets of the JAS 39C/D which is the product on offer. Sweden is not reducing its C/D in fact the C/D fleet is being expanded.

    5 nations with plans to fly the type another 30+ years. Future R&D is already funded. So I don’t think the worries you talk about is on the Saab side.

    I would argue for the good points of your favourite aircraft rather than talk negative about other jets, in part because only the Armasuisse know the results of tests and how they match the Swiss requirements.

    If I follow your advise, I guess I should praise the great t-w-ratio of the typhoon and it’s comparably huge order backlog.
    But this wouldn’t reflect my perception of the situation. It is Saab’s competition to loose, but Dassault presented a very convincing package.

    in reply to: He is back! He is angry! Rafale News Four! #2478354
    Aurel
    Participant

    Some kind of computer hiccup. Delayed the testflight in light configuration a whole day.

Viewing 15 posts - 406 through 420 (of 939 total)