I think Europe could better modify the PC-6.
Why not take the Fieseler Storch as basement for your modifications ? It’s STOL capabilities would be unmatched by any contemporary strategic transport :rolleyes:
If it ever will be modded, then I could only imagine something comparable to the A-310 MRTT. That would mean no larger newdesign. The better ‘european solution’ would be a re-engined An-124. Simple and cost-effective.
Not if your lone super fighter breaks down. You have less planes then your missions are limited. Air-to-air engagements are the least important things in a war. The seat of purpose is always on the ground.
The idea of attacking and then running away and then coming back later to finish the job is idiotic. The second you take off, the course of battle could have changed. They might need you there to control the air while something decisive is being played out on the ground.
Super weapons without numbers usually don’t win wars. The Tiger Tank, the Me262 and the Yamamoto Battleship couldn’t hold back the allied tide.
The topic was hordes of LWF’s or few heavies.
Of course is it important to generate enough sorties, so that you don’t get overwhelmed, therefore enough airframes.
Without a2a engagements no air superiority, without that no chance of victory in a conventional war.
If we go into this, we would need to discuss the importance of the different mission-types (interception, interdiction, strike…)
The Tiger Tanks were defeated by aircraft and lack of fuel/supply,
the Me 262 was pressed into service as the war was always lost and the relations where not 1:3 as we discuss in this case, the Yamato and Musashi where not used properly because of lack of oil and where defeated by airattacks….
If my country would be able to afford it, I would always prefer the heavier design. More range, higher speed and cruising speed, larger radars. The heavies can normally deny an combat, the lightweights can’t. If used purely in the defensive role, where range is not that important, light fighters can be sufficient.
Best example here is the Gripen. With it’s network capabilities it is able to compensate most of it’s disadvantages, while it’s advantages get multiplied.
But this works only above the own soil.
The FC-1 or whatever poor man’s fighter is lightyears away from that perfection of the Gripen. They got their BVR capability. Fine. With my Flanker I shoot today one and **** off, the next day another. Superior numbers mean nothing if the pilot in the heavy fighter dictates the rules of the engagement.
If the heavy is in the defense, well then things start getting interesting. Here they can’t deny combat. But therefore I got that much fuel in my Suk, I climb above the enemy, use the superior range of my missiles und well, at least I would score a soft kill. The lightweigt fighters had burned their fuel for avoiding missiles, lets say 20% are shot down, the rest needs to drop it’s ordnance in order to get home with the reliefing fuel.
As the guy in the suk I would now think about chasing the light fighters and shoot even more down.
Here my own lightweights could come into play (If I have). To tidy up and enlarge the losses of the enemy.
They can’t be serious to use the EC 145 for CSAR/Special Ops. How urgent is the replacement of the Dauphin ? Can’t they wait till the NH-90 is proven, or simply take the Blackhawk ? A policeheli with MG’s mounted on the doors. 😮
Sounds to me like a CSAR heli. So, why is the NH-90 not shortlisted ? From that list a would choose the Blackhawk and the Lynx for a closer look.
I really like this ‘cherry three camo’ of this Eagle. It even beats the Israeli desert camo. The JSDFAF should really use it as standard camo. 😉
All the given numbers in the article are correct. The only problem is, that they ‘forgot’ some additional informations. In difference to the RAF, the Luftwaffe has it’s priority in training their ground personel. Therefore, the low flying hours for the pilots. But this is planned that way. It was never intended to fly more then the stated 130 hours. EADS has a much more passive role then BAe Systems in keeping the Typhoons up in the air.
Only for it’s appearence my alltime favourite is the Yamato before it’s refit with additional AAA.
My favourite modern warships are the Sachsen-Klasse, and the Swedish Visby-Class, as well as the Akula submarines. All three are capable designs and look very sleek.
And I really liked this Trimaran design for the British CVF competition.
I think it is higly unlikely that a war between Turkey and Greece breaks out. I’m pretty shure the Greek won’t attack Turkey. Turkey attacking Greece is the more likely scenario. That means Greece in the defensive role. Big plus here for Greece. They got that many different SAM systems, that it will be pretty hard for any attacking airforce.
In the end war on ground will lead to no winner, considering the topography.
And how the EU will react I don’t know. Would like to remember you that Berlin is the second largest Turkish city in Europe. :dev2:
I think the naval war will be fought mostly with submarines. Both sides won’t expose their surface vessels in offensive operations, that brings them closer to an hostile airbase then to their own.
Regarding the original question who will win: I think nobody. Both sides are not strong enough to overwhelm their opponent completely.
Aurel: Mate they Taiwanese were interested in the Collins but that deal was squashed because of Australia’s “One China” policy in any case, it’s probably a good thing, look at the problems we’ve had with them!
As I wrote, which western country would sell to Taiwan except the U.S. ? Reading the latest news from France, then they won’t. Italy has only a contract from HDW to build the U-212 for their own fleet. Scandinavian countries have nothing new, and they have also very strict export laws. Australia won’t as you wrote, too.
If they are really interested in something new, then the U-212/214, the Scorpene and the Collins are the only possibilities. Or is there anything else ? Maybe the Dolphins built for Israel ? :confused:
What they really need in my opinion is an effective new SAM system to protect the Island from those massive numbers of Chinese ballistic missiles and to keep the Flankers away from their bases/ports.
Are there any helis included in the package ?
It depends on my political situation. If I’m surrounded by friends, I would go for the (cheaper) light fighter. If I got nasty neighbours, I would prefer the more impressive and heavier one.
I think the Zulu Cobra will win. The best solution for a country that already operates Cobras.
If it is politically motivated, well then good chances for the Tiger.
The U.S. tried to get German submarines for Taiwan, but the export was denied.
Don’t know any source for western SSK’s, willing to deliver to Taiwan.