dark light

Italy

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 286 through 300 (of 418 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: UK's 1st F35. #2354809
    Italy
    Participant

    i agree, i never liked the F-35’s colorscheme (or anything else of it on that matter). would look a lot better in the F-22’s scheme, or even the old 60’s RAF Grey/green camo 😎

    they should use this color scheme because that’s where the UK’s actions gonna be for the next 25 years
    http://img.thesun.co.uk/multimedia/archive/01234/SNF22SPD_06_1234819a.jpg

    in reply to: Italy's M-346 and Russia's Yak-130 thread #2354895
    Italy
    Participant

    nothing wrong with the code name Mitten, it fits the Yak-130 like a glove!

    some news about Spaghetti Yak

    Alenia Aermacchi Signs Contract with Israeli MoD for 30 M-346 Advanced Trainer Aircraft

    (Photo: Alenia Aermacchi)

    17:11 GMT, July 19, 2012 Alenia Aermacchi, a Finmeccanica company, has signed a contract with Israeli Ministry of Defence to supply 30 M-346 advanced trainer aircraft.

    The deal is part of a larger Government-to-Government agreement between Israel and Italy that includes aircraft, engines, maintenance, logistics, simulators and training, provided also by other Israeli and international companies.

    The new aircraft will replace the A-4 Skyhawks currently in service and will make up the new trainer fleet of the Israeli Air Force. Delivery of the first M-346 is expected in the middle of 2014.

    Giuseppe Giordo, Alenia Aermacchi Chief Executive Officer and Responsible for the Aeronautics Sector of Finmeccanica, said, “The signature of the contract with Israel for the supply of 30 M-346 – including an advanced training system – is the result of the technological and productive excellence of the Italian industry, the highly regarded collaboration between the two countries and the synergies with the Italian Defence Ministry. This achievement is an outstanding success for Italy, both at institutional and industrial level. The women and the men of Alenia Aermacchi, our partners, the small and medium enterprises that participate in the programme must be honoured to be part of this great accomplishment”.

    Following the contract signed in 2010 with the Singapore Air Force and the one with the Italian Air Force in 2009, this new international achievement makes the M-346 the worldwide best seller for new generation trainer aircraft and is testimony to the excellence of the high-technology of the Finmeccanica Aeronautics Sector Companies.

    BACKGROUND INFORMATION

    The M-346 is the ideal platform for a latest-generation integrated training system. The versatility of the M-346 allows for its configuration as an affordable advanced combat aircraft. Thanks to its innovative technical characteristics, the aircraft also stands out on account of its high degree of safety and low acquisition and operating costs. The M-346 has been designed using the latest “design-to-cost” and “design-to-maintain” concepts, with an avionics system modeled on those used in new-generation fighter aircraft, such as Eurofighter, Gripen, Rafale, F-22 and the F-35.

    Following the contract signed at the end of 2009 for the acquisition of a first lot of six M-346 aircraft and the ground-based training systems, the first two M-346s were delivered to the Italian Air Force at the beginning of the year.

    The M-346 received its Military Type Qualification Certificate from the Italian Ministry of Defence – National Armaments Directorate in June 2011, an essential requirement to certify the full correspondence to aircraft specifications and to international military requirements.

    In September 2010, the Singapore Government signed the first international contract for 12 M-346 and ground-based training systems (GBTS) under the Fighter Wings Course (FWC) program. This contract was signed with the consortium, formed by ST Aerospace (prime contractor), Alenia Aermacchi and Boeing. The first aircraft are scheduled for delivery this year. Alenia Aermacchi also finalized contracts in June 2011 with ST Aerospace to provide logistics support to the Republic of Singapore Air Force fleet of M-346.

    in reply to: Turkish Air Force – News & Discussion #2354897
    Italy
    Participant

    TAI rolls out Turkey’s first Hurkus trainer

    http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/picture-tai-rolls-out-turkeys-first-hurkus-trainer-373621/

    is the Hurkules based on the Korean KT-1 trainer?

    in reply to: Su-17M4 #2354952
    Italy
    Participant

    Any news on the remaining Su-22 fleets still in service? Any upgrades planned?

    Vietnam upgraded some Su-22s in 2008 and bought 40 more from Poland and 5 from Czechia. Ideally they intend to phase htem out in favor of Su-30MK2

    http://www.american.edu/sis/aseanstudiescenter/upload/17313967-Thayer-Vietnam-Peoples-Army-Modernization-and-Development.pdf

    in reply to: Turkish F-4 down #2354965
    Italy
    Participant

    They never learn…
    😡

    perhaps Greece, Syria, and Iraq should form their own alliance against Turkey.. the Super Best Friend Alliance, with Armenia as an observer.

    in reply to: IDF fighters over Cyprus #2354967
    Italy
    Participant

    and they used to be good friends too 🙁

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread 9 #2354969
    Italy
    Participant

    There is a series of photos of Russian AF Yak-130 #26.. all stencils, cockpit placards or MFD menus are in Cyrillic (not surprisingly..)

    interesting, inside cockpit labels are in english, outside cockpit its in Russian

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread 9 #2355433
    Italy
    Participant

    What other air forces said so?

    I still have yet to see any firm proof, vague statements aside.
    One pilots mastered MiG-29, there was little MiG-23 offered it.

    my rafale loving friend,
    if you have doubts about the MiG-23MLD’s radars and air force opinions of it, please check out AFM October 2003 and ACIG publications particularly on Mid-East air forces.. lots there.
    perhaps one of the reasons why the 29 was a slight downhill step in advancement compared to the revolution of the MiG-21, 23, and 25 was because the 29 entered service after the passing of the late Artem Mikoyan and Mikhail Gurevich who couldn’t see it at the end 🙁

    in reply to: Military Aviation News-2012 #2355480
    Italy
    Participant

    Tejas Fighter Jet Won’t Be Combat-Ready Before 2015

    meanwhile its cross border and somewhat technologically inferior cousin, is being pumped out by the dozens.

    in reply to: Italy's M-346 and Russia's Yak-130 thread #2355482
    Italy
    Participant

    From Take-off Magazine Jun 2005

    http://i384.photobucket.com/albums/oo288/binhbeo77/Yak-130.jpg

    wow if true, the ferry range is very close to that of the MiG-29 😮

    in reply to: Future UK MPA/ASW aircraft #2355484
    Italy
    Participant

    Newer than every KC-135, newer than Rivet Joints, newer than a lot of P-3s . . .

    I’m pretty sure the Nimrod airframes could have been zero-lifed, & the combat system, sensors, cockpit, etc. completely replaced, as in (e.g.) the Spanish/Airbus Military P-3 upgrade, for a relatively modest price. The problem was in (1) trying to build what were effectively new aircraft, built to modern standards of precision, while incorporating large parts of old aircraft built to ‘bodge to fit’ standards of precision, (2) bloody awful project management, & (3) downright dishonesty by the people in charge at both the MoD (see JBritchford’s post) & BAe.

    Remember the senior BAe engineer who refused to sign off the MRA4 plan because he considered it to be unfeasible, & how BAe got round the necessity for his signature for the project to proceed?

    All the reasons he gave for refusing to sign, back in 1996 or whenever it was, turned out to be entirely correct.

    Fedaykin:
    A320 is (& was) available with a part-British engine option, the IAE V2500. There could have been a good market for an A320-based MPA, ready before the P-8, & with BAe building wings & doing the conversions, RR making a big chunk of the engine, & as many British weapons & sensors aboard as possible, it’d have provided lots of revenue for the UK & BAe. Over its lifetime, BAe could have got a lot more from a part-BAE A320 MPA than an all-BAe Nimrod MRA4.

    Funny thing about the Nimrod AEW was that the things which killed it (e.g. weight, space & power requirements for all the kit) all went away soon afterwards, as electronics shrank. Erieye was flying in 1987, & delivered in 1996. Think what could have been fitted into a Nimrod airframe if work had begun a bit later, based on newer technology. Wedgetail? Pah! Too late, mate!

    it certainly is tragic that the Nimrod was canned.. another nail in the coffin to the once glorious British aerospace industry. At the rate things are going, South Korea will have a more active aerospace industry than the UK 🙁

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread 9 #2355527
    Italy
    Participant

    No program yet to replace the Mig-29.period.

    i stand corrected 🙂

    in reply to: Why the carrier-based AEWA does not enter jet era #2355528
    Italy
    Participant

    Trend is definitely toward jet powered airplanes. See P-8 replacing P-3C.
    Jet has higher cruising altitude by about 15 to 20k feet and can provide more power to radar and onboard electronics.

    yes even Japan is moving to jet powered patrol aircraft
    http://www.9abc.net/wp-content/uploads/ta-thumbnails-cache/TAdownload/2011/8/839-1.jpg

    perhaps they also got it right going jet powered C-2 instead of the A400 thats turboprop

    same size, same cargo
    http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-YJlLSV7nQ28/T4OXajukQ_I/AAAAAAAAKi8/2-aAolaReb0/s1600/Japan+JASDF+Kawasaki+C-2+%2528XC-2%2529+military+transport+aircraft+%25282%2529.jpg
    vs
    http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/46900000/jpg/_46900980_jex_545786_de27-1.jpg

    in reply to: NEW CHINESE STEALTH FIGHTER SIGHTED #2355556
    Italy
    Participant

    I’m telling you its a twin engine Mako.

    Just you wait!

    well Eads did offer a twin engine MAKO to Korea
    http://img849.imageshack.us/img849/1365/kfx20eurofighter20visio.jpg

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread 9 #2355567
    Italy
    Participant

    Might be a bit off-topic, but still – as far as Bulgarian MiG-23 and 29 are concerned, the MiG-23 had definitely the better radar – about 10-20 km more range and moreover it was more mature at least in the beginning. MiG-23MLD’s were also quite manueverable. However, keep in mind that our MLD’s were one of the last ones ever produced and some of them produced for the Soviet Air Force – thus they have all possible upgrades (both in electronics and aerodynamics).

    Thanks, that pretty much confirms what many air forces have been saying.. the MLD’s superior radar over the early MiG-29. Many people underestimate the MiG-23MLD’s capabilities.

Viewing 15 posts - 286 through 300 (of 418 total)