dark light

Italy

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 418 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Which direction Taiwan? #2299567
    Italy
    Participant

    This leaves Taiwan with just two options, Russia and India. Neither cares what China threatens them with.

    indeed those two options are correct and Russian firms are working with Taiwan to produce their next fighter

    http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2009/06/20/2003446652

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 10 #2299571
    Italy
    Participant

    Yes, but how much costly and time-consuming disassembly/reassembly is involved? Does the main rotor head have to come off or is it sufficient to remove/fold the blades etc.? If you only take it apart far enough, you’ll eventually be able to carry even a CH-53E inside a C-130J (although that means shipping it in crates!) 😉

    you have a good point.
    could not find the same two helicopters being loaded in but this is the closest

    Il-76 eating Puma
    http://www.chapman-freeborn.com/en/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Loading-IL76-SIN-OAIX-Puma-06SEP-2012-068.jpg

    C-17 eating Sea King
    http://media.defenseindustrydaily.com/images/AIR_C-17_RAF_Sea-King_Heli_Offload_lg.jpg

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 10 #2299858
    Italy
    Participant

    There isn’t One True Set of requirements. If there were, then there’d be no place for different sizes of cargo aircraft, & we can all recognise the value of a mix of different sizes.

    But we do know that there have been numerous evaluations of requirements over the last few decades, based on looking at what armed forces want to carry, & what loads cause problems with existing aircraft, & they’ve all concluded that the big constraints are (1) total internal volume, & (2) cargo box cross section. Every air force that’s done this analysis & is able to influence aircraft design has asked for (in addition to smaller, & if it can afford it some very big aircraft) fatter medium-large transports than those designed in the 1950s & 1960s. It’s pretty obvious, if you think about it. A lot of the things that armies have & want airlifted have been getting bigger, & this has been causing strains since the 1970s, at least.

    This includes the Soviet air force – hence the An-70.

    We can see that these analyses haven’t resulted in identical aircraft. Japan is less interested in field performance than some other countries, for example – hence the C-2.

    So, we come back to the Il-476 vs An-70 debate. What part of the Soviet analysis of the 1980s, which the Russian air force insisted right through the 1990s was still valid, suddenly ceased to be correct? Was it technical, or was it the “Must not be Ukrainian” part? I see no evidence whatsoever for the former. It looks to me to be all about Russia buying Russian aircraft, whatever the drawbacks.

    I agree with you that the Il-76 fans are strong

    but

    Il-76 can eat a helicopter, despite what you said

    http://www.helis.com/h/sa330_zs-ruh_il76.jpg
    http://www.blackanthem.com/TheAllies/military_2006050403a.jpg

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread – 19 #2299863
    Italy
    Participant

    http://www.indiastrategic.in/topstories1766_IAF_decides_144_fifth_generation_fighters.htm

    True? Much lower than initially envisaged.

    you answered it best in another thread. Russia is no longer cheap, labor costs are approaching Western European levels.
    India is also no longer a dollar a day wage place either so even they can’t make it that cheap.

    if they wanted 200 they should’ve bought J-20s 😮

    in reply to: What if : USSR vs Japan 1991 Air/sea battles #2299909
    Italy
    Participant

    There’s a 1988 game called Super Daisenryaku for the Sega Genesis

    there is a map where Japan and Russia fight over the Kuril Islands

    why don’t you go play that map as Japan and tell us how Russia responds and you’ll get your answer. Since its set in 1988, it should be close to whats available in 1991.

    http://www.romsite.net/images/screenshots/nds/4501-5000/4746c.jpg

    😮

    in reply to: Military Aviation News-2012 #2299926
    Italy
    Participant

    Hi-tech wise, i doubt Russia will lose anyting of importance to US intel.
    So its a fair chance for Russia to get a fothold in Middle East Arms market.

    just like how India is diversifying away from Russian with US stuff
    Iraq is diversifying away from US stuff with Russian

    no country wants to be dominated by one sole supplier.

    so, think Iran will be willing to give back Iraqi jets that landed there? Iraq could use some Su-24s. but definitely No MiG-29s.

    in reply to: INS Vikramaditya: Steaming towards Induction #2010967
    Italy
    Participant

    Superb! 😎

    That island in the middle is the only eyesore. Is there any strong photoshopper who is capable to shift that massive island to the edge?

    for that comment alone
    hetzer is going to hetz you

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread – 19 #2300895
    Italy
    Participant

    Apache wins the IAF attack chopper contract according to Livefist

    hooray, but the Kamov should’ve won that if it was even in the competition to begin with.

    in reply to: Bolivian T-Bird's? #2300897
    Italy
    Participant

    I wonder what if anything we could do as a forum to try and persuade AFM to cover the Bolivian T-Birds before they are gone or at least cover the retirement when it happens. Am I really the only reader that would find that a fascinating read?

    Thanks for the link by the way. Nice to find out some of that information.

    no they need to do an F-89 scorpion first then T-birds ridden by t-girls

    in reply to: Any news on Hellenic Air Force cutbacks? #2300914
    Italy
    Participant

    In my opinion, these austerity measures would make for a good reason for the Greek military to consolidate its equipment in general. The Greek Air Force alone has that many different aircraft, it must be a training/maintenance nightmare!!

    Regards
    Pioneer

    they need to because their logic is like Malaysia..
    they don’t quite trust the US so they try to diversify with two sources of equipment. After all the US is the biggest supporter of their #2 enemy.

    in reply to: Bolivian T-Bird's? #2301333
    Italy
    Participant

    I know I brought this up a while back, but has anyone seen any current information on the Bolivian T-33 fleet? Have the K-8’s replaced them all. I haven’t been able to determine whether they have actually been retired yet (as of October 2012).

    they are gone.. done and done.. no more T-33 flown by T-Girls.
    the K-8 is superior in every way except one.

    it will never be as good looking as the old T-33.

    in reply to: Kazakhstan Air Force #2301629
    Italy
    Participant

    Kazakhstan, aka Russia’s Canada, wants An-70s

    Внутренние войска Казахстана закупают технику и вооружение

    Внутренние войска МВД Казахстана в 2012 году приобретают новые вооружение и технику.

    Об этом, как сообщает корреспондент 1tv.kz, рассказал заместитель командующего внутренними войсками республики полковник Абдисадык Ережепов. «Мы закупаем новый самолет АН-70 (он может лететь 4,5 тысячи километров без дозаправки), два вертолета, около 17 российских бронеавтомобилей «Тигр» (ими в первую очередь будут обеспечены подразделения специального назначения внутренних войск «Буркит»), 18 новых бронетранспортеров и более 160 автомобилей», – сказал он.

    По словам Ережепова, материальная база внутренних войск страны ежегодно улучшается по плану перспективного развития, разработанному комитетом войск. В 1,7 раза выросло общее финансирование внутренних войск МВД Казахстана в 2012 году.

    Отметим, в Павлодарской области по ходатайству местных исполнительных органов будет увеличена численность личного состава двух воинских частей. Их командованию выделены новый бронетранспортер, один топливозаправщик, а также шесть «КамАЗов», которые позволят в случае необходимости за короткое время быстро передислоцировать их личный состав.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread – 19 #2301636
    Italy
    Participant

    don’t show prospects as orders for the Mi-26. Besides, I see that when I talk about the Ka-226, its not part of the answer. anyway, I don’t want to waste my time engaging in a discussion with a person like you (directed at JSR), so don’t waste your time replying either.

    the IAF is looking to retire the MiG-27 fleet by 2017

    link

    when do they plan to replace the Haguar?

    in reply to: PLAAF Thread 15 #2301640
    Italy
    Participant

    the Lavi is derived from the F-16. The J-10 can be derived from an assorted canard -wing fighters: Typhoon, Rafale, J-9, FS-X, or J7W Shinden

    no J-10 is not derived from them. Typhoon uses a different canard lay out with its canards way out in the front and an intake that has no commonality with the J-10 because it uses an S duct. J-9 has fixed intakes and is an interceptor. FS-X never built. Shinden.. LOL

    nice try.

    early J-10 models and the full scale mock up show strong Lavi influence before they re-designed the intakes.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread – 19 #2302125
    Italy
    Participant

    Indian FGFA model unveiled..

    basically Saffron version of pakfa

    http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8297/8008986366_db36c80696_z.jpg

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 418 total)