dark light

stealthflanker

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 691 through 705 (of 781 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2193847
    stealthflanker
    Participant

    The AEW&C program (biz jet based, S Band, 300km class for a small fighter target) is in trials. Follow on program is in development.
    An airborne AESA radar for the LCA is in prototyping.

    Would love to hear some more about those programs.

    The airborne AESA for fighter one looks interesting. So India will directly leap to AESA instead of having some “interims” (slotted planar arrays or PESA’s) Like Other nation.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXV #2193853
    stealthflanker
    Participant

    God pls give me a chance to see/watch vid on PAKFA releasing ordnance, especially from internal bay. Ameen.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2194125
    stealthflanker
    Participant

    hmm so far i seen India developing planes, engines and A2A missiles. How about airborne radar ? Does India ever develop a fighter or AEW radar ?

    in reply to: US Air Force Unveils New B-21 Bomber #2194646
    stealthflanker
    Participant

    Well.. i think the final B-2 concept was exactly like that before changed to B-2 as we know right now.

    in reply to: Chinese Air Power Thread 17 #2194760
    stealthflanker
    Participant

    Anyway i wonder if anyone can give me little bit info on what radar did China put inside their J-11 family ?

    As far as i know.. the earliest J-11B were using a slotted planar array called as “Shedian-10” I wonder if that slotted planar array radar also make it to the J-15, J-16 etc.

    Anyway i believe J-11D got an ESA radar, would love to know more about it.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXV #2194778
    stealthflanker
    Participant

    At least they have something interesting on there, unlike certain other holes-of-the-web where everything is garbage (like RussiaDefense). BTW, Paralay’s isn’t nearly as nationalistic as F-16.net IMO.

    c’mon man can you forgive them 😀 ?

    —–

    Other than that.. hmm i’m curious if PAKFA will mount any form of say..internal self protection jammer.

    in reply to: Japanese Stealth Fighter ADX Thread! #2195239
    stealthflanker
    Participant

    High speed taxi test …

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oONJsb3CGIM#t=12

    Just like when PAKFA exhibited at first time… I scream… FLYYYYY… FLYYYY

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2195242
    stealthflanker
    Participant

    Yes , given the lesser dimension you can put Two R-77 in the tunnel instead of the single row R-27.
    Still we are talking about the two hardpoint under the engine pods.
    I’ll wait until they introduce KAB-250kr hoping for a triple mount, like the one used by French.

    im thinking of 3 R-77 with fins folded.. Thus total 6 in that “tunnel” .. 3 at front pylon and another 3 at rear.

    —————

    So how’s the airstrikes so far ?

    Hmm it appears that FSA does not agree with ceasefire agreement if Nusra group is not included.
    My conclusion is that FSA have weakened so much that they need to rely on Nusra to do their fight.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXV #2195535
    stealthflanker
    Participant

    We know nothing at all about PakFa.
    Nothing on empty weight, thrust or lift/drag.

    With that lack of transpherent insight the PakFa must be pretty horrible… according to these guys;

    http://www.f-16.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=36&t=28006&p=316189#p316189

    :):D

    I just wish …when assessing stuff.. ppl can be more like Richard D Ward.

    https://www.scribd.com/doc/298950019/FIGHTER-DESIGN-From-Soviet-Perspective

    while some ppl behave as he wrote at the last section of the paper..

    “Some quarters
    have questioned the viability of this concept because
    of the apparent support complexity of modern weapons
    however, Soviet aircraft and their support systems have
    always been designed to achieve this capability. The
    question is in assumptions of the questioner. The problem
    is possibly in demanding “mirror images”

    Anyway that AIAA paper is like a gold bar to me 😀 it’s nice to finally found one a paper that outlines how doctrine and situations affect fighter aircraft design.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXV #2195596
    stealthflanker
    Participant

    It’s kind of annoying to see that 384 m/s… it fueled some flame wars in my FB group.

    Would love to calculate it myself.. but then i have nothing on weight info of PAKFA.

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2195639
    stealthflanker
    Participant

    well looking at those jammer pods brought me to an old question..does it support Crosseye jamming modes ?

    in reply to: Iran-Iraq air war #2196152
    stealthflanker
    Participant

    Ah.. Iran-Iraqi air war.

    Well the only thing i’m interested in is that..is Iraq really have Kh-22 ? The only source of this is Tom Cooper…and only in literature.. No photos, no physical evidence.. nothing. My correspondence with Flateric of secretprojects and in other forum also yield that Iraqis does not possess Kh-22.

    in reply to: Frankenplane Prototypes #2197109
    stealthflanker
    Participant

    sometime ago.. i tried to stick Hellduck into YF-23A form.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]244169[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2197466
    stealthflanker
    Participant

    Hmm how Tu-214R works ? is that a pure ELINT/SIGINT platform as RC-135 or did it also double as ground battlefield management like E-8 JSTARS ?

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXV #2197721
    stealthflanker
    Participant

    anything released yet on weight statement 😀 ? I’m still curious on the empty (operation empty weight) weight of PAKFA.

    I wonder if they managed to make it lighter than Su-27S.

Viewing 15 posts - 691 through 705 (of 781 total)