dark light

sealordlawrence

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,401 through 2,415 (of 5,730 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: I think the MoD is up to something… #1922821
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    A week ago, I noticed that there was no section on the wikipedia entry for the Sa-80 rifle listing the considerable faults and controversies surrounding the weapon, which was surprising, because there used to be such a section, so I duly added one. It may of not been perfect, but I did my best.

    Anyway, I check the entry today, and it has (rather conveniently for the MoD) disappeared. I think someone may be editing wikipedia to their benefit :rolleyes:

    Oh well, I guess its to be expected, but it makes me question whether this is in the spirit of free speech. :confused:

    The SA-80 no longer has these problems. They were on the Mark 1, the Mark 2 is a far superior weapon and by some reports has been out performing the M-16 series in current operations. To say that the current SA-80 is a flawed or faulty is wrong.

    in reply to: General Discussion #361708
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    Anyone know why China wouldn’t allow U.S. sailors to go into Hong Kong for a port of call during the Thanksgiving Holiday? I understand it’s something most Chinese don’t celebrate, but it just seems rather mean to not allow these people to see their families (many of whom probably flew to Hong Kong for the occasion).

    Also, I heard that a pair of U.S. minesweepers requested refuge in port from a storm and they were denied by Beijing.

    I understand the U.S. and China aren’t the best of friends, but does simple humanity not outweigh political differences in certain situations?

    This all just seems…..well…mean.

    You should hear what some US politicians have to say about China.;)

    in reply to: China…..Why? #1922826
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    Anyone know why China wouldn’t allow U.S. sailors to go into Hong Kong for a port of call during the Thanksgiving Holiday? I understand it’s something most Chinese don’t celebrate, but it just seems rather mean to not allow these people to see their families (many of whom probably flew to Hong Kong for the occasion).

    Also, I heard that a pair of U.S. minesweepers requested refuge in port from a storm and they were denied by Beijing.

    I understand the U.S. and China aren’t the best of friends, but does simple humanity not outweigh political differences in certain situations?

    This all just seems…..well…mean.

    You should hear what some US politicians have to say about China.;)

    in reply to: General Discussion #361711
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    Faith and begorrah sire..sure aint i only a little fella all right….:rolleyes:

    Now you really are taking the biscuit old boy….YOU calling ME a Troll….YOU???

    Jeez…you should have been on the stage ..you missed your true vocation!!:dev2: finally , finally a sense of humour…not a great sense of humour but at least a good attempt ! keep at it ye will get there eventually!

    And the above perfectly proves the point.:rolleyes:

    in reply to: four by fours #1922830
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    Faith and begorrah sire..sure aint i only a little fella all right….:rolleyes:

    Now you really are taking the biscuit old boy….YOU calling ME a Troll….YOU???

    Jeez…you should have been on the stage ..you missed your true vocation!!:dev2: finally , finally a sense of humour…not a great sense of humour but at least a good attempt ! keep at it ye will get there eventually!

    And the above perfectly proves the point.:rolleyes:

    in reply to: Distiller's demand – UK get out of JSF! #2545738
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    The word of the President of the USA ought to be enough.

    hahahahahaha….another classic Jackism, seriously that one is hilarious, up there with when you said that Bars is an AESA…….lol!:D 😀 😀 :rolleyes: 😀

    in reply to: ASW/GP Escorts #2043474
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    The GP escort frigate concept is still very much alive. It is just a case that they have become even more multi-role. With the ever increasing power and range of missiles and radar has resulted in these vessels becoming mini destroyers rather than true Frigates. From the USN perspective the LCS is a psychological OHP replacement and I have no doubt that as missions re-orientate in the coming decades that the LCS will get modules that make it an ASW frigate.

    in reply to: General Discussion #361854
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    Certainly lacking in that department.

    Coming from you that is hilarious!:rolleyes:

    BTW you should realise that Hurrifan is a troll.

    in reply to: four by fours #1922867
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    Certainly lacking in that department.

    Coming from you that is hilarious!:rolleyes:

    BTW you should realise that Hurrifan is a troll.

    in reply to: General Discussion #362186
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    That makes a change sealordlawrence.:rolleyes:

    Now you have just stopped making sense, if I dont have a problem with bikes how does that make a change.

    in reply to: four by fours #1923009
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    That makes a change sealordlawrence.:rolleyes:

    Now you have just stopped making sense, if I dont have a problem with bikes how does that make a change.

    in reply to: UK military helicopters #2547523
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    The things is whilst the Merlin is a good Sea King replacement it really is too big to be a good Puma replacement.

    Considering the Puma was going to be replaced from the early 90’s by the Westland/Sikorsky Blackhawk it’s no surprise we are in such a dire situation with that platform now.

    I think that the AW.149 was a very calculated move by Augusta Westland, its clearly a suitable replacement for the Puma in the same class, final assembly is slated for the UK and it’s based on existing technology which should keep the risks and costs down. I think they are expecting an order down the line as a Puma replacement possibly attached with a stupid PFI for the SAR replacement program.

    The thing with the AW.149 is that it seems to be very close in terms of capability to Future Lynx, please correct me if I am wrong?:confused:

    in reply to: General Discussion #362298
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    Why, whats your problem with bikes then ?

    I dont have one.:rolleyes:

    in reply to: four by fours #1923048
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    Why, whats your problem with bikes then ?

    I dont have one.:rolleyes:

    in reply to: Stealth vs Stealth #2547543
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    Your comment does not change fact that number of F-22 in USA service is pure American problem and not problem of entire international community that is contributing to this forum and it has nothing to do with air to air combat tactics but only with internal USA politics.

    Seeing as it is currently the only true ‘stealth’ fighter in service now I think it would be absurd not to mention it in this thread.:rolleyes:

Viewing 15 posts - 2,401 through 2,415 (of 5,730 total)