You surely have some test results on that, don’t you?

I don’t know where do you have this from that ergonomic design of the AR is worth something. I personally found the rifle awful to hold and to operate.

Its called personal experience and general perception gathered from others. Its also the reason behind the great bullpup debate and why current western rifle designs are covered in Polymer bulges.

…so you understood that the Aya!!! yell in this on particular posters first post was negative word and ment same as no??

And who are you to call anyone to support anyone in a princible. Should this one particular poster draft a list of all those people victims of other oppresive regimes which you haven’t expressed your support???

Only you could try and pick fight in a thread like this.:mad:

The ordinary people tried this back in the late eighties, 3000 of them got killed by the Junta so it is probably understandable that they are on the scared side.:rolleyes: The involvment of the Monks is critical due to their revered place within society and it should be pointed out that contrary to what one poster here seems to be suggesting the ‘ordinary people’ are heavily involved in this. I note that that paticular poster has yet to express his support for those protesting against the regime.:mad:

Ergonomics can theoretically improve your combat ability, but the marginal between AKs and some more modern and cleaner western rifles are as small as the accuracy and other factors that it would really make any difference.

There is nothing theoretical about it, better located controls better balance better cheek weld etc etc will all help to improve accuracy and reaction time. Hence so much effort is put into ergonomics when weapons are designed, especially in the west.

Oh and Garry I never said anybody could not use an AK, just that the types ergonomics are (in my opinion and in the opinion of many many others) inferior to the AR-15 type, so your little remark about 5 year old Africans was utterly unneccesary.

Aya!!!

Also for Rhodesia, Siam, Zaire, Yugoslavia, DDR and even for Soviet union and for the rest of the “no-longer-existing country names”…

…Whats wrong to use the name Myamar??

Call it what you like, in the UK and US its referred to as Burma, but either way the point still stands.

Crying out loud swerve and sealordlawrence its on a bloody plane :rolleyes: 😀 Wait and see what happens But I do like Plan B if the MOD cancel the F-35 and thats a Sea Typhoon :diablo:

James

Maybe they could call it Fury!

There you go again. A reply which is childish, offensive, & entirely devoid of information. Are you actually trying to make yourself look a fool?

Nothing childish about it, unlike you usage of the word fool. Simply pointing out that you answered your own question.;)

I dont know whether this will be any use to you, but here it is. Its about an Elbit upgrade for the amphib transport version, hope it helps.

Originally posted by Tango III in the Navy section of the forum.

http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2007/09/24/216897/elbit-completes-first-phase-of-royal-navy-helicopter.html