The book is superb, it also documents the demise of UK civil aviation manufacturing having handed most of it over to France!
Looks like I will be making yet another investment in literature!:D
I get what you’re saying, but it really is that simple–in general, the fewer who know, the better. I didn’t say that security could ever be perfect, and I don’t think that Devils Advocate meant to say that, either. The F-22’s secrets are not completely secure even with Americans, of course, but adding the manufacturers and air forces of other countries would make them far less secure still.
What has come out in recent years through various arrests and trials suggests that, with the exception of the blackest of black programs, the military industrial complex leaks like the Titanic.
UAE shortedlisted the T-50, M-346 and Hawk for their advanced trainer. The M-346 is currently undergoing hot weather evaluations at Al Ain airbase. The T-50 completed its evaluation around the end of June. The Hawk is due next week.
The temp today at Al Ain was 48C in the shade.
Thanks Mark.:)
Hawk Advanced Jet Trainer to be evaluated by UAE air force
Two UK Hawk Advanced Jet Trainer (AJT) aircraft based at BAE Systems, Warton, departed for the United Arab Emirates (UAE) 1 August to be evaluated by its air force and air defence.
The two aircraft may be chosen by the UAE is as part of the competition to choose a new jet trainer for the country’s air force and air defence.
Earlier this year the UAE down-selected the Hawk AJT alongside two competitors to potentially meet its AJT requirement. The winner is expected to be announced before the end of the year.
The Hawk AJT’s will be tested in temperatures in excess of 45° Celsius, and will include more than 30 flights during the two weeks it will be in the UAE.
Hawk sales executive leading the UAE campaign Steve Wearden, said: “The evaluation will play a central role in the competition and the aircraft will be put through its paces in conditions we don’t experience in the UK.
He said that the Hawk has “a great deal of experience” in aircraft operations in hot, humid environments because it has been used in many countries in the Middle East, including the UAE, for over 25 years.
“The aircraft undertaking the evaluation are aircraft that will ultimately be delivered to the UK Ministry of Defence to train the next generation of RAF and Royal Navy fast jet pilots.”
I thought that the UAE was going for the T-50?:confused:
In my uber cool fantasy land it would be nice if the British cancelled their JSF order, converted some of the Typhoons then began working on a variant of the BAE Replica with Typhoon engines, PIRATE, CAESAR, and other common goodies as a follow on.:D
Of the top of my head they should nearly have all of the 102 F-16I’s and there was an article posted in the ‘Modern Military Aviation News’ thread claiming that the IAF was planning to upgrade the entire F-16C/D fleet to that same standard as the Sufa, that should give them over 200 of one of the most capable F-16 variants out there. On top of that there is the F-15 fleet which is/ (?) was undergoing an upgrade program. All in all a very powerful airforce and probably more than a match for any other in the middle east.
The below is a good site.
Wow that is confusing! Could you keep us updated on this one Hyper. I would be especially interested to know if anybody conclusively decides that one of the pics is a new PLAN SSN?:confused:
Adapting? All they need do is stick a decent radar into its nose and they got a good all rounder that can do almost anything
Maybe you could explain how CAPTOR is not a decent radar?:rolleyes:
Looking at the Eurofighter helmet mounted sight how does it compare to say the JHCMS that is mounted on a range of US platforms and how does it compare to say the Gerfaut system mounted on the Rafale?
What are the key differences between the systems?
Mowers
Well seeing as Gerfaut is not mounted on the Rafale it compares quite favorably in that department.:p
Well if they converted the entire Typhoon fleet and stuck to the ridiculous idea of procuring V/STOL F-35s they could replace Joint Force Harrier with Joint Force Strike Command!:p
ASTOR is the PR.9 replacement. Radar is replacing camera. The Tornado GR.4 now carries the RAPTOR recon pod.
The 16DDHH’s are not designed to operate aircraft. Yet, that doesn’t mean they can’t or won’t for that matter. Remember, the RN Invincible Class CVS Carriers currently in service with the Royal Navy! My whole point is a small number has its benefits………..
The RN’s carriers are significantly larger than the Japanese boats and were intended to operate Harriers from the outset. They are also capable of carrying over 20 aircraft including up to 16 Harriers. They are in a different class to the new Japanese ships.
No. From 2008 the delivery is no longer urgent at all. The USA prepare its allies for the new reality for the next decade.
That post makes no sense at all. The 2008 elections will make little if any difference to US policy towards Iran. All the major presidential candidates from both party’s have made it clear that they will not tolerate an Iranian nuclear bomb.
I disagree – I believe it makes a Japanese aircraft carrier inevitable. The question is when, not if, it will be built.
I have to agree with Turbinia, a Chinese carrier does not mean there will be a Japanese carrier- it is a very long way from inevitable.
A Chinese carrier does not neccessarily mean a Japanese carrier, although it may well mean changes in Japanese defence policy. The “through deck cruiser” has always been seen as subterfuge and lies by the RN to get carriers approved without politicians noticing it, but actually the design did evolve from a planned ASW command cruiser requirement and the design ended up being “through deck” as it was decided it made the most sense operationally and wasn’t really a deliberate piece of deceit at all. The politicians knew fine well what they’d approved with the design and it was re-classified pretty early on in it’s life. The ASW command cruiser evolved into a carrier thanks to the Harrier, without the Harrier, which was not designed as an attempt to circumvent the RN losing carriers, the Invincibles would have probably served as ASW helicopter carriers just like the DDH or commando assault carriers.
Just to add that the RN also considered (very seriously) using the P.1154 V/STOL fighter (supersonic Harrier) on the CVA-01.