Zhuk-MSFE could well be flown on some tests.
That says nothing that such tests were finished and indeed they weren’t.
Zhuk-MSFE development was stopped some time ago, and funds were redirected to MiG-29 developments.
Also does not mean that it could not be made ready in a short time if requested. Furthermore there is no reason why Venezuela could not have opted for the Bars.
I am not quite sure here. If you have noticed, Venezuelans started beating their Flankers big time, the first two delivered already clocked 700-800 hours in total! Beating an unarmed airplane wearing MSFE just like that ain’t the brightest idea of all. I think it is rather a sensible solution to order medium tech fighters (well, what do we call medium tech, these are still on par with F-15Es!) to build up the force and then go for Su-35BMs. Which is what Chavez has finally announced.
That does not make any sense at all, this is a combat aircraft, a Russian one at that, its designed to be used and flown irrelevant of what technology is in them. Both the MFSE and the Al-31FM1 have been test flown in Flankers so configuring a vaiant as such should not take long at all.
These aicraft are not ‘on par’ with F-15E’s, there sensors are miles behind. Fact is these planes are about as poorly equipped and configured as Su-30s come.
NO, NO, NO
The Alpha missile I posted above have nothing to do with the KLUB missile family (developed by the NOVATOR bureau). Apart from name, they have nothing in common.
The air-launched version of the KLUB cruise missile is called KALIBER. Here is a picture. Note that it is completely different from the ALPHA missile I am talking about.
Thanks UAZ.;)
The Pak-fa will not be exportable for a while, and when it becomes available for export it will likely be like the Su-30MKI with largely western avionics because the Russian bits are not for export and will not be cleared for such.
Current users of the Flanker have other fighter aircraft in service already… India has Mig-29s and Mirage 2000s, China has various fighter jets in service too. If they want a 5th gen fighter the Mig will likely be exportable first in whatever role, especially if co developed with the Indians with a lot of Indian and other international avionics… in fact we have no reason to believe currently that the RuAF will even want some expect to boost numbers perhaps which is just supposition. They will already have Mig-29SMT and Su-35BMs in service remember.
Evidence, sources? No, there is nothing that says the Pakfa componants will not be exported.:rolleyes:
I actually see MK2 as the most overrated fighter in PLA and that Venezeula got robbed blind on the deal if they paid as much as what was they did.
Even in PLANAF, I feel the recent JH-7A are more favoured right now due to its better range/payload + avionics.
I would agree with the comment about the MK2 being overrated but I would like to see some evidence for the JH-7A being a better aircraft?
It would not have taken alot for the Venzuelans to have got alot better aircraft than these from purely Russian sources. For a start they could have gone with the proposed but cancelled Su-30MK3 (maybe upgraded it with the Zhuk-MFSE instead of the MSE). Then there is the engines, the 117S will soon be available, and at least the AL-31FM1 and possibly even the AL-31FM2 are available now with full 3D TVC.
Frankly considering what is now available to the Flanker these aircraft are poorly equiped and probably over priced.
I think the way it is intended to be used by the PLANAF, it is very effective as a maritime striker. Its role is primarily focused for it rather than a full on multi role aircraft. the benefits? seems like it is much cheaper than the more advanced Su-30MKM, and produced in faster larger numbers with less complications.
for China, they have a number of other aircraft for fighter support, J-11, J-10, etc.
maybe some other countries that cannot afford more numerous types, may settle for more expensive, and advanced, but multirole jack of all trades, if that makes sense.
However if Venezuela is realy considering the Su-35 they should be able to afford an Su-30MKI derivative, even if it has all Russian systems to avoid US pressure.
Pardon me… but who gives a damn? That is a local problem and Venezelans will have to deal with it by themselves.
You know, Bush is being criticized so often not because he is the worst and most cruel leader on the planet. He is criticized becasue if he does some BS, then many people in the wold are affected by it… unlike Chavez, whose acts normally do not get beyond local reach. That is the price you have to pay if you want to mix in the global policy.
BTW, thousands are dying in Darfur everyday..and you get excited by shutting down some TV station? :rolleyes:
The reality is that Bush made policy mistakes towards Chavez to start with but he is now increasingly living up to the dictatorial pariah state image that most would have regarded as ridiculous only a few years ago.
Al’fa missile (3M51) was a prototype of concept for the 3M54E missile now used on the Klub system.
Its R&D have been stopped, and an air launched version of 3M54E should be called 3M54A, as much as the cruise missile version is called 3M14AE (export).
IIRC this missile actually exists and was announced at the same time as the Mig-35. Or at least an air launched Klub land attack missile was.
I think we all need to temper the Bush bashing here a bit, or are we forgetting that Chavez recently shut down the main opposition television station?:mad:
Sura-M is for the MKM while MKI has Sura-K.
The question has to be asked, what is the difference? Which one is ‘better’?:confused:
An Su-30MK# with TopSight & Mica-IR 😮 Ultimate WVR killing machine!
The Mig-29K will use the TopSight system but this is the first time I have heard of the Mica being considered for a Russian aircraft. What HMD does the MKI use?
I think where you’re getting the Indian interest in [Sukhoi] PAK-FA from is down to the shockingly unprofessional reporting in the Indian press.
The outgoing IAF Chief was quoted last month as saying the ‘PAK-FA’ was “still on the drawing board”- a clear reference to the MiG.Having said that, a high level Sukhoi delegation is due in Delhi this month, along with senior Russian military officials to discuss the Su-30MKI (and other) cost escalations/acquisitions. Perhaps Sukhoi will try some strong-arm twisting and convince IAF to scrap the $10bn MMRCA tender, buy additional Su-30s to plug falling force levels & co-fund PAK-FA development/ production to speed things up. But common-sense is an elusive virtue in the Indian Defence Ministry- they like to wave at it, as it passes them by…
I have argued on here almost since its inception that the MMRCA tender should be dropped and a further 100 Su-30MKI’s ordered- that way the IAF could finally start to get some sort of standardisation and alot of very capable and very upgradable aircraft.
The point I’m trying to make, Sealordlawrence, is that a decade ago whilst MiG was lying in intensive care, the politics favoured Sukhoi, who busily nurtured new export customers & filled the order books for Irkut, Knaapo & Tikhomirov-NIIP. Such was the runaway success of the Su-30, PAK-FA development could be funded in-house.
The genius of M.Pogosyan is that he knows he has the entire Su-30 MLU programmes’ in the bag, 2,000t/r module AESAs & supercruising Al-41Fs, will turn Su-30s into the poor man’s F-22, significantly enhancing their already formidable capabilities.
BUT he does NOT have a 5th Gen. fighter that is VIABLE for export (politically or economically), and under the consolidation that is UACorp, that huge Su-30 customer base will naturally look to MiG’s LMFS (vs the, no doubt more expensive & politically sensitive, F-35) as their complement/replacement. So whilst Sukhoi may dominate on the domestic market, MiG is well placed for global windfalls. Savy?
No, there is no reason what so ever to say that the Pakfa will be ‘unexportable’ and there is even less reason to say that current Flanker customers will want to buy a lighter fighter as a replacement. No flanker, no matter how upgraded is ever going to match the Raptor purely on the basis of its huge RCS, the Pakfa is the only vague hope on that front. Indeed India seems to be expressing interest in the Pakfa now.
There is no evidence or even reason to say that the Pakfa is/will be ‘unviable’ for export.
I would add Bangladesh, Northern Korea, Malaysia and Azerbaijan to the post-1991 Fulcrum list. Not sure about Syria, but IIRC, even Hungary only ordered their MiG-29s after the regime change. Anyway, you got some valid arguments here, I think the small export potential of the F-22 is largely due to its insane price tag, which makes it pretty impractical to consider for most world’s airforces.
No to mention the US governments ‘you cant have it its all mine mine mine’ attitude.;)
The Mig-31, and the Tu-128 for that matter were never used outside the PVO till there was a merger. Suggesting the Soviets had small, medium and heavy fighters is rubbish. Are you suggesting that the USAF had the same set up… F-5/-20, F-16, F-15?
The reality is that Mig-31s and Su-27Ps might have operated together but the heavy/light fighter mix was the Su-27 and Mig-29 because the Mig-31 was not a fighter… it was a pure interceptor.
Late model Mig-29s had a max takeoff weight of about 22 tons, late model (in Russian) service Flankers had a MTOW of about 33 tons while the Mig-31 had a MTOW of 45-50 tons. Are you going to expand that because the Mig-31 was in service since the late 70s to include heavy, medium, light, very light and super light… Mig-31, Su-27, Mig-29, Mig-23, Mig-21?
The Mig-21 has gone, been replaced with the Mig-29- or have you forgotten? :rolleyes: