By air assault they meant sending in the 101 airborne in helicopters, for a rapid cordon and sweep operation backed up by Iraqi army troops.
I can understand the perspective of the US, currently thaey are the most powerful country in the world and this is based largely on technological prowess, so why the hell would they want to give it up, when people in Europe seriously talk about a Unified continent competing with the US (although this looks unlikely now), the chinese economy is going to overtake that of the US by 2050, possibly even before 2040, and India and Russia have the potential to be great powers within the century. The Americans feel nervous and thats their right.
Personal opinion,
The Tu-160, truly gorgeous but combined with pure power no fancy stealth stuff.
The B-2, the most capable, virtually impossible to find and you van argue with 80 JDAM’s
The B-52, The best record, I dread to think how many people its made dissapear.
The idea that UCAV’s keep costs down is a myth, they just allow the pilot to be removed thus the aircraft can be made more efficient in other parametres, such as stealth, manouvrebility and weight. as well as allowing humans to be further away from combat thus making war more politically acceptable.
If the Varyag is going to sea again I would suggest that it is at least a year probably 2 or more away, there are absolutely no sighns of any radar, weapons systems, or aircraft handling systems, it is still very likely this thing will become a tourist attraction.
In there an improved version of the Iskander being developed called the Iskander-M or something with Greater range and Accuracy?
The CdG can carry 40 aircraft including the E2C hawkeye, I remeber reading that the plan was for the CdG to be able to carry a max load of 36 Rafales and 3/4 AEW aircraft, whether the ship is capable of that now I dont know.
As a very general rule of thumb you can say that a carrier can often carry one aircraft for 1000tons of its displacement.
If you ask me the ability of the ADS to only carry 30 aircraft is telling of the relative inexperience that the designers have of producing such large carriers. I just hope that they have managed to fit in some Amphibious capbility and/or some heavy anti-air armament, remember the CdG carrys the Arabel radar and Aster-15.
And the fact its a better plane than the Rafale.
Typhoon has already won, M1 unlikely to replaced or supplemented.
For their VSTOL carriers.
I assume that the US would cap the number of planes any one country could buy, you dont want another having more Raptors than you now do you.
They were talking about the Leclerc a few years ago, but I dont think the money or the need realy exists.
A navalised Typhoon is possible, BAe says it can be done and it was one of the 3 original options studied for the CVF, it would just cost more than buying the Rafale M of the shelf.
Thankyou Vaiar, it would be nice if some people knew what they were talking about before they started talking.
errr Thatcher actually fought against the Keynseian model, it was that model of economics that virtually ruined the UK before the Thatcher reforms of the 1980’s. Elements are still in use in other parts of Europe and it is partly responsible holding the continent back.