Because other governments do similar things,including your own,I do not have any axes to grind and I am not nationalistic or anti american(you get the good,the bad and the ugly in every country !!!) …politicians from all countries act in similar ways 😉
regards baz
Which was the whole point of the comment. It was in response to a poster claiming that the US does it. You have just demonstrated what happens when you dont bother to read back through a thread.:mad:
That’s the point they don’t have to be full spectrum, they can be tailor made for a task, because they don’t have a squishy thing up front they can do things a manned aircraft cannot do and are cheaper to design and produce because of the lack of squishy support needed.
The idea that you fly a manned aircraft over heavily defended areas is fundamentally wrong, a standoff missile will do the job 95% of the time, the other 5% can be done by loitering Ucavs with less risk to aircrew.
Re fighter aircraft, if you were designing a fighter would the JSF be the result?
If you want a pure fighter then the JSF isn’t it, that’s what the F-22 is for.
If you want a pure ground support aircraft then the JSF isnt it, the A-10 or Pucara would be better.Cheers
Its that easy is it? You can just design a UAV to have the same A2A capability as a Raptor or JSF?:rolleyes:
I am very sorry if i really upset you but I thought your comment about Saudi was a little naive.
regards baz
How is pointing out a basic fact naive?:rolleyes:
I am very sorry if i really upset you but I thought your comment about Saudi was a little naive.
regards baz
How is pointing out a basic fact naive?:rolleyes:
An assessment I’d concur with. Although it must be pointed out that an aircraft-carrier lookalike tourist attraction must actually be made to look like an aircraft-carrier!. Still 2 years is a lot of yard time for completion of the internal spaces and a few coats of red lead.
The components RSM has indicated are all absolutely viable for post-build inclusion. Though it must be said the HVAC (life-support?) runs being left out from the initial build suprises me. Its easier to put in those conduits, along with major cable trays etc, when you are putting the hull together. The thing that might be the give away, if anyone knows it, is the power train i.e gearboxes and shafts.
These have to be very precisely fitted and balanced not just physically within the hull, but, also with the main engines. If the Chinese are intending to use different rated engines, to the original Russian spec, the gearboxes and shafts will need to be matched to the different output and revolutions range. That is a lot of work and at an end of the ship that would not be expected to see such work where it being completed as a casino?.
Who knows. What we can be certain of is that the Varyag was in a bad way when she got to China, at least as bad as Gorshkov and probably worse.
Poor USN… still running on 30+ old hull designs and designing aircraft carriers on the basis of 50+ year old hulls… Must be in crisis, surely. I wonder what the Russians wait for before exporting democracy to Long Island 😀
Go take a look at DDG-1000, LCS, FREMM, Type-45, etc and see the difference in terms of propulsion, CMS, IPMS, IBS etc etc.
Actually USN shipbuilding is in a crisis (no where near as bad as Russia), there was a 2006 GAO report that stated just that.
Targeted vs fired. Big difference.
Again, learn to read.
Not in the context of that sentence.
More garbage and lies to hide your ignorance and bias. You really do believe in your little world that the Iranians would just shoot conventional weapons into Europe or America, ROFL! 😀
The stupidity of this suggestion is of epic proportions.
Again, you need to start reading. There are multiple scenarios underwhich ballistic missiles could be targeted at Europe from the Middle East.
And you need to retract your racism comment.
Who’s assuming anything here?
As for Talwar being basically a Krivak III hull… DUH! … incidentally, project 22350 is also basically a Krivak III hull.
Too many condescending tones with you for no good reason….
Nothing condescending at all…..perhaps you have a complex?:confused:
Designing ‘new’ ships on the basis of 30+ year old hulls is ot demonstrative of a healthy shipbuilding and design industry. Especially given the progress made by western shipbuilders.
Well if you feel that strongly about it, and you obviously think I am callous & ignorant because I won’t allow them to chop up my kids why don’t you go a step further and donate one of your good kidneys? You only need one afterall……….. You don’t want to do it? Why not? Personally I find your attitude callous and ignorant for denying someone a life 😡 now who’s the hypocrite?
If somebody requires one of my surplus organs they are welcome to it. So no hypocrosy from me at all.
Surely though, there is some hypocrosy to your desire to preserve the state of a lifeless corpse whilst allowing the living to whither and die?:mad:
Well if you feel that strongly about it, and you obviously think I am callous & ignorant because I won’t allow them to chop up my kids why don’t you go a step further and donate one of your good kidneys? You only need one afterall……….. You don’t want to do it? Why not? Personally I find your attitude callous and ignorant for denying someone a life 😡 now who’s the hypocrite?
If somebody requires one of my surplus organs they are welcome to it. So no hypocrosy from me at all.
Surely though, there is some hypocrosy to your desire to preserve the state of a lifeless corpse whilst allowing the living to whither and die?:mad:
You gotta admit you got something of that stupid stereotype imagination about all Muslims just looking for a way to die as martyrs, don’t pretend you don’t. Adding a pink smilie behind your response does not quite help conceal it..
Another entirely false accusation.
If I have ever stated such a thing on this forum you will be able to quote it, otherwise you owe me yet another apology in this thread.
Beware of the Neuron, american infidels!! :diablo:
So what are Neurons A2A capabilities?:rolleyes:
If there already were some, then what’s the point having F-35 at all? :rolleyes:
That was my point.:rolleyes:
As you know – none.
Precisely my point.We are decades away from an F-35 equivilant UCAV.