Since your post seems directed at my comment, I’d like to reiterate; people can choose to fly Ryanair.
Obviously they work for you, for others – like me – they don’t.
Not having a go at you – your post simply provided the phrase around which I constructed my post…
Just making the point that there are, like in every company, some pretty d*mned helpful people working for FR as well and that there are many working for ‘other airlines’ who could not give two sh*ts. To single out Ryanair as disreputable is an adjective too far for me.
Yawn… same old prejudices….’more reputable airlines’?
I’m not fussy about being treated like a princess when I fly – I like the plane to take off and land – on a runway, wheels down – but I don’t have much choice when I fly home to visit my family – either fly FR and be at my parent’s gaff within 15 minutes of stepping off the plane or fly to another airport and travel an hour when I’m coming and another hour when I’m going (two extra hours with my family is way more important to me than being treated like the Princess with her flaming pea).
The ‘more reputable airline’ cancelled their route to that airport – presumably because FR were tonking them.
Another two ‘more reputable airlines’ helped me fly from LHR-MCT-RUH in a magically brief 36 hours.
Yet another ‘more reputable airline’ kept me delayed 8 hours in JNB, stopped me from embarking at CDG just long enough for me to miss my connection and didn’t offer any assistance at the gate – other transfer pax were met at the gate and escorted to their flights.
The stories could go on but, I’ve generally found FR staff to be businesslike – some of them are even friendly considering the kind of dross they sometimes have to deal with. Their website is designed to catch the unwary, but if you post on a forum you should be able to operate voting buttons and drop-down boxes.
And yet they are villified in some quarters… unlike ‘more reputable airlines’.
hmm :rolleyes:
Feel free to delete if it’s a step too far (I like my humour a bit dark – and stupid :o)…
What’s orange and can’t go through a revolving door?
Judith Chalmers with a javelin in her head
Feel free to delete if it’s a step too far (I like my humour a bit dark – and stupid :o)…
What’s orange and can’t go through a revolving door?
Judith Chalmers with a javelin in her head
No BIN price.
Hope I don’t get sniped at the last second 🙁
well the pucarra and skyhawk looked in tip top condition so it may be toutchy !!
although it was interesting to observe a sea harrier pilots observations on the pilots
he said ” whilst the millitary were in the main a young conscripted force , the jet pilots were a diffrent kettle of fish entireley , from a country that breeds world leading race drivers you would expect the pilots to be good …they were !! they were outstandingly good !! “
Always thought that comment was a little odd. They certainly seemed to be brave but outstandingly good? I thought that many of the UXBs were attributed to their pilots flying too low to give the bomb fuses time to arm.
The air combat figures don’t paint a glowing picture either – no British A2A losses. On the occasions when A2A engagements took place it seems that the Argentine pilots could not or would not make best use of their aircraft – either staying up high where they had the performance advantage or losing comprehensively in the dog fight at lower speeds & altitudes. I ‘m not sure the AIM 9L was the difference (as mentioned elsewhere – no head-on kills occurred or did they?).
Fair dos for having a go… brave certainly, good flyers even but skillful in combat or even sane?
Back to the photies though – cool indigenous species and nice old Brits!
My initial thought was ‘They are going to have a heck of a job keeping the seagulls, pidgeons and starlings off her!!”
Good luck to them.
Very Good point.
How do they manage this problem on the Intrepid and other outdoor exhibits?
12 bore CIWS or a whole bunch of j-clothes and buckets of water?
Lovely, nice and simple!
During the Cyprus problem Shacks were turned into transports They left at hourly intervals from Abingdon. Reducing the crew from 10 to 6, they ferried soldiers – 33 per trip! – Abingdon to Malta then on to Nicosia.
My Dad recalls, being thusly transported back from Suez to (he thinks) Blackbushe, via Tripoli. I don’t think he was overly impressed with the arrangment.
Yes – they are the aerials for the SRO-2 IFF system – called ‘Odd Rods’ by NATO.
Ken
Thanks guys! ‘Odd Rods’ – there’s an expression I’d forgotten existed!
If any memorial should be protested it’s the one of Bomber Harris, unbelievably insensitive!
Why on earth shouldn’t there be a status of Harris?
He did a thankless job, reasonably well.
From what I’ve read, he cared deeply about the well-being of his crews (the fact that he sent thousands to their deaths was unfortunately in keeping with the nature of that conflict and the level of sophistication of the technologies used. Men were, sadly, expendable when fighting that ‘total’ war).
He had the courage of his convictions that strategic bombing would shorten the war and save lives (you can argue about whether it did or didn’t – but he believed it did and by doing so that it would save peoples lives)
I’m sure he spent the rest of his life haunted about the terrible losses on both sides. I repeat, he had a thankless task and not many men could have taken the strain of that job with so much forebearance.
I don’t have my references to hand but I don’t believe Harris particularly wanted to ‘get at’ Dresden – I believe it was ‘next’ on a schedule of targets decided at higher level. If you want to talk about pointless deaths on the eve of victory/defeat you can talk about kamikazes or sending kids out with panzerfausts or the RTR Sergeant sitting in the turret of his tank when a German mortar round dropped right down on top of him minutes before the ceasefire – I’d like to see a memorial to those victims of cruel fate – they’re all someone’s child.
I don’t see Dresden as being an illegitimate target – it was total war, it was a German city – lots of Nazis and, no doubt, lots of innocents there too – like Berlin, Hamburg et al.
He did warn them it was coming – ‘reap the whirlwind’ etc… (ok, slightly flippant point but Germany got more warning than the citizens of Guernica, Pearl Harbour etc…)
And now I play devil’s advocate – did the strategic bombing of Germany and Japan work? The war against the axis (including strategic bombing) turned two highly nationalistic, expansionist dictatorial empires into forward-thinking, peaceful democracies.
I do not think we can criticise or judge this man unless we’ve walked 6 years in his shoes.
Reads like part of the inspiration for ‘633 Squadron’
Can any one advise me on the wording
” I grabbed the sting and gun sight “
I am sure the word STING is incorrect can anyone help as I cant read this man’s writing.
Am currently reading ‘Flights of Passage’ by Samuel Hynes (a Marine pilot flying TBM Avengers in the Pacific).
Just read this bit which reminded me of your post…
‘…At the back end of the tunnel, under the tail, a thirty calibre gun, the stinger, was mounted…’.
Might just be slang for a defensive position as mooted in other posts…
Cheers
Seb
I’d have thought the expensive bit of modern aeroplanes would be all the boxes that go in them, rather than the airframe itself.
Therefore resurrecting old designs, surely wouldn’t save any significant costs if the avionics etc… still have to be developed and millions of lines of dodgy coding debugged???
Ok then, I’d love to see a few old British designs fly again and an obligatory wing of TSR-2s…:)
good day sexy boy.
well to answer your question
Il-96 no crash
Il-86 no crash
Il-62 had a few incidents, 20-30 something I believe, many of it pilot error. Tu-154, more than 5x that!
Il-18 just one accidentif you ask me, its quite gravy!
This source quotes 37 accidents for the Il-18 (high fatality rate as well). I thought ‘one accident’ seemed low for this generation of aircraft operating in harsh conditions in the USSR, Africa etc…
http://www.airdisaster.com/cgi-bin/aircraft_detail.cgi?aircraft=Ilyushin+IL-18