dark light

dionis

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 241 through 255 (of 1,704 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode XVI #2347195
    dionis
    Participant

    Zukhorskiy?!

    Zhukovsky? 😉

    No PAK-FA display at MAKS > http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/2011/05/f-15e-somehow-steals-moscow-ai.html 😡

    F-15E the highlight? I’d expect people to be far more interested to see something ridiculous from the Su-35.

    in reply to: J-15 for Russia? #2348532
    dionis
    Participant

    I hope this was a late night drunk thread…

    With the Su-35 coming online, getting that level of avionics into the Su-33 is not something China is capable of.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2351949
    dionis
    Participant

    I’d second that. While no one knows how much RCS reduction the Su-35S received, it’s probably reasonable to assume that the F-35 is way stealthier than the Su. Unless the Flanker has some ridiculously powerful radar or jammer, in most engagement conditions, the F-35 will the first shot. Just my observation

    Get the first shot and let the Flanker find it immediately on RWR/ESM?

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2352100
    dionis
    Participant

    Great news. Now to keep the Su-34 production increasing, and keep the older Flankers and Foxhounds upgraded to a solid level.

    in reply to: US Stealth UAVs flying out of Afghanistan #2352817
    dionis
    Participant

    The only reason you would need anything stealthy over there is to do things you shouldn’t be doing…

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2353463
    dionis
    Participant

    Local basing and cheaper to operate than the larger Su-3x series, with more than enough firepower to deal with Saakashvillis 🙂

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2353522
    dionis
    Participant

    The Mig-35 would be a good contender to keep schmucks like Saakashvilli away…

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion, Part III #2004919
    dionis
    Participant

    Project 949A

    “Oscar-II”

    in reply to: MMRCA News and Discussion 8 #2353936
    dionis
    Participant

    What a surprise – the late 1980’s and 1990’s jet beat the 1970’s designs…

    The US should have sold the F-22 and Russia the Mig 1.42 😎

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part- 4 #1797710
    dionis
    Participant

    Intercepting interceptors? 😎

    in reply to: J-20 Black Eagle – Part 5 #2358077
    dionis
    Participant

    Why the heck are you guys calling this thing the Black Eagle anyway?

    Being black does not cut it for this name 😎

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part- 4 #1797807
    dionis
    Participant

    Summarizing:

    – RS-20 follow-on will be lighter but not less lethal.
    – It may carry false warheads.
    – Currents silos will be ultra-hardened (passive defenses).
    – Point ABM defenses will protect them (active defenses).
    – Number of nukes necessary to disable them will rise from 2 to 4-6.

    It sounds impressive and technically affordable, although it doesn’t sounds cheap. Those requirements are explained in face a NATO encirclement strategy with ABM defenses and PGMs. In the end, it is obvious that Russian planners doesn’t believe in the reset button and marketing like that.

    It’s clearly best to plan for the worst. No one knows what idiots will take power in other parts of the world.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2358876
    dionis
    Participant

    More Mi-24Vs have been lost to Taliban ground fire in Afghanistan in the last 10 years, compared to Apache losses. The Polish AF have lost 3 HINDs altogether in Afghanistan to all causes, compared to 10 AH-64 losses. The greatest negative effect to Mi-24 survivability is probably its 12.7 mm rotary gun, which forces the Mi-24V to get in close to the enemy (and the enemys’ return fire). I think the Americans made the same mistake with the 7.62 mm minigun on its Cobras during the Vietnam war.
    Stand-off attack ability is probably the method of surviving light ground fire – All gunships need a minimum of 20 mm gun, along with the necessary targeting and aiming equipment.

    For the USSR it was the Stinger difference, in case you forget.

    If the Talibs got Iglas or Stingers, Coalition rotorcraft are big time screwed.

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion, Part III #2005778
    dionis
    Participant

    Granat and Klub are not comparable TR.

    For land-attack the Granat would be great, but what about reasonable ranged anti-shipping?

    Hence why I asked about Klub on Akula.

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion, Part III #2005870
    dionis
    Participant

    So multiple versions of Klub?

    What’s the rumor on Akulas being able to use Klubs?

Viewing 15 posts - 241 through 255 (of 1,704 total)