dark light

dionis

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 376 through 390 (of 1,704 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode XV #2392890
    dionis
    Participant

    Have you all even considered the fact that Russia is also far bigger? And the Su-27s and MiG-31s won’t be around forever. Don’t make me laugh, IAF more PAK-FAs than.. RuAF.. 😀

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode XV #2393153
    dionis
    Participant

    according to Ria Novosti’s site, India is set to buy around 300 Pak-Fa, making it potentially the largest Pak-fa operator in the future! 😮

    http://en.rian.ru/news/20101007/160867582.html

    We have no idea how many Russia will order. And India will wait a long time before they get any.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Часть 3! #2397264
    dionis
    Participant

    The Soviet Union built the Smerch. Modern Russia cant even afford to keep the system up to date. The Chinese A-100 outranges the Smerch by 30km’s and the reload time is 8 minutes as opposed to 16-20 for the Russian system. Twice the rate of fire and 1/3 greater range, and the rockets are the same size, I would call that a serious improvement.

    The A-100 isnt even the best Chinese MLRS, its just what they cobbled together after ripping apart the Smerch systems they bought from Russia in the 90’s.

    A-100 was never even taken into service with the PLA? I call BS on those reload and salvo numbers, and firing range is just a matter of wanting to get a better rocket booster. Something the Russians are basically masters at.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Часть 3! #2397400
    dionis
    Participant

    From the above, clearly you can get better boots in China too!

    And it’s a copy of a Smerch – seems like the motherland made something worth copying, again!? Seems odd that suddenly it became easier to reload and with less crew. I guess those Chinamen are real reloading olympic gold medalists huh? 😀 I call that one complete BS evidence, if there ever was any!

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Часть 3! #2397417
    dionis
    Participant

    My list has holes because actually its worse than all that. To list all the areas where Russia has lost its position would take a week.

    Yep, everyone buys some stuff abroad but Russia is heading to the point where its not buying a few stop gap systems abroad but entire classes of weapons that will make up a very large % of the procurement budget.

    In many respects, the country is returning to where it was at the end of the 19th century when it imported and licensed foreign designs exclusively.

    Even basic kit for infantry is now imported. As it stands right now Russia cant even make competitive optics for small arms. Watch videos from Dagestan and Chechnya, and count how many soldiers have put EOTech on their guns. You want to brag about the MiG’s IRST when there is not a single acceptable red dot sight made in Russia?

    They dont even make goggles and knee pads domestically and have to import Swiss goggles for the mountain divisions, Swiss and German skies, and American pads. Russia, the land of snow and ice, has to import skies for its mountain units! Is the US importing basic infantry kit too? These are small things, but signs of a deeper disease.

    More like you listed a bunch of equipment they never took much pride in anyway. The USSR never made targeting pods, as aircraft had internal targeting systems; they never made any revered pistols or bolt-action rifles post WWII either. Russia has never attempted to make large naval vessels either, since Soviet ones still work fairly well for another decade or so. So I don’t know what you are talking about in terms of “economically” – you have no benchmarks whatsoever. Smerch is arguably the best MLRS around, unless you have direct evidence to the contrary. Lada is in testing – some small part of the electronics didn’t work right – boohoo, its a test sub – what a surprise? And for diesel engines, there’s some fairly decent T-90 potential upgrades with loads of extra horsepower.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Часть 3! #2397491
    dionis
    Participant

    Russia has fallen drastically behind in a huge range of technologies where it used to have near parity. Part of it is lack of investment and part of it is also a lot of misspent money and failed projects.

    1. Conventional submarines (the Lada program is a disaster)
    2. Communication satellites (Yamal series sats are already basically more European than Russian).
    3. Diesel engines, which in turn limits what they can do with tanks and IFV’s. Basically every Russian armor vehicle being offered is obsolete by the standards of at least the last decade.
    4. Targeting pods and optics (they are already buying French)
    5. They’ve essentially lost the ability to COST EFFECTIVELY make surface combatants over 8,000 tons. The purpose of the Mistral deal is to remedy this.
    6. Engines for light helos. At present the first batch of Ansat and Ka-226’s are flying with foreign engines (French).
    7. Piston engined or turboprop basic trainers. They are probably going to buy a Swiss basic trainer which will be built in Russia. Again, they have no engine for a domestic trainer.
    8. Pistols, SMG’s, high accuracy sniper rifles. Russian special forces buy MP-5’s, Glocks and Accuracy International.
    9. Artillery. Russia has failed to keep pace with improvements seen in Western and Chinese MLRS and tube based systems. China’s new MLRS systems outrange Russian systems, are cheaper, faster to load and even more accurate. Russian systems havent improved since the mid-90’s.
    10. Helicopters in general. Urt Air signed a deal for 20 European helicopters today because Russia has nothing to offer but the Mi-8 family. They would buy Russian, but there is nothing Russian to buy.

    It would be easier to just list the few areas where they still lead or have near parity.

    1. Missiles
    2. Manned jet fighters
    3. Radars

    That’s about it.

    Everyone buys something abroad. The grand US doesn’t make everything itself, either.

    Your list is full of holes. I’m not even going to bother.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Часть 3! #2401800
    dionis
    Participant

    Examining those reports carefully shows that ‘new’ aircraft so far are actually the aircraft left incomplete when production ceased in the early 1990s. When those have all been finished, it may be possible to build additional completely new Tu-160s.

    Right – but why waste unfinished airframes of that caliber?!

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Часть 3! #2401938
    dionis
    Participant

    I’m just saying its unrealistic, to say the least. How big is the Tu-160 fleet today? 15, 16 aircraft?
    Russia schould focus its resources on realistic and useful systems like PAK-FA, S-400/500 and new tanker aircft and satelites. The nuclear deterrance bit can be handeled more than enougth by submarines (the new SLBM subs make sence) and landbased systems. Not even the U.S seem to be in a rush to build up its strategic bomberforce again.
    Lets face it, Russia is not a rich country. Building a new (and competative) strategic bomber is just pissing away their resources. God for saber ratteling along the Nato coasts etc, but not of indispensable military value. Just like those fantasy carriers. Better use the monney to build up the Su-34 fleet. Or use it for public healthcare to fight the ever increasing AIDS and herioine epidemic.

    The Tu-160 fleet is set to grow, as production right now is 1 aircraft per 18 months as per last reports.

    The PAK-FA/S-400/etc are systems that can easily be afforded with the recent re-armament approvals.

    And about Russia not being rich? By what standards? Comparing them to the bloated US spending that is being cut too? Give me a break. :rolleyes:

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Часть 3! #2402149
    dionis
    Participant

    Su-27UB from the Far East?

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Часть 3! #2406085
    dionis
    Participant

    Kh-101 fits into Tu-160 bays, but not Tu-95MS bays it seems.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Часть 3! #2406228
    dionis
    Participant

    http://img-fotki.yandex.ru/get/4900/wait4me90.24/0_3f959_5b70210c_orig

    http://img-fotki.yandex.ru/get/4903/wait4me90.24/0_3fa0d_a887eec3_orig

    Tu-95MS with Kh-101/102 pylons.

    Seems to be becoming more and more common.

    in reply to: PAK-FA Saga Episode 14 #2417823
    dionis
    Participant

    The true advantage that the F-35 has is that because of the better radar and VLO capabilities, it decides when and how it will engage.

    There’s not a shred of evidence that the APG-81 is more capable than the Irbis-E, *especially* in the A2A engagement situation.

    AESA vs PESA is not an automatic win for AESA.

    in reply to: Su-35bm and J-11B #2422064
    dionis
    Participant

    that’s because you can’t. You have no details to begin with 🙂

    Neither do you buddy. So delude yourself to believing something that you materialized out of thin air. You don’t have anyone here convinced. Most people remain skeptical.

    in reply to: PAK-FA Saga Episode 14 #2423593
    dionis
    Participant

    And just so I can tell you.. that I told you so.

    You are suggesting that the FIRST SERIAL will be in 2020+ ? 🙂

    in reply to: Su-35bm and J-11B #2424111
    dionis
    Participant

    @Dionis,
    well IR/TV guided weapons as well as ARMs don’t require the radar.

    Precisely.

    That’s why they focused on improving the FCR capability in long ranges. 🙂

Viewing 15 posts - 376 through 390 (of 1,704 total)