dark light

dionis

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 391 through 405 (of 1,704 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Su-35bm and J-11B #2424139
    dionis
    Participant

    From what I understand, the Su-27SM radar should be primarily optimized for long-range A2A engagement. It really had no use for precise, SAR type applications. Either way, both TV/IR and laser weapons can be carried by the Su-27SM, along with basic anti-radiation weapons like the Kh-31PD.

    in reply to: PAK-FA Saga Episode 14 #2424148
    dionis
    Participant

    Where these projects “stemmed” is irrelevant.

    I suggest you compare first-flight to operational dates for the MiG-29/31 and Su-27. 🙂

    in reply to: PAK-FA Saga Episode 14 #2424437
    dionis
    Participant

    I personally don’t see any date before 2020 as very realistic..

    That’s retardation… (pun intended) 😉

    That’s way too unrealistic for the RuAF. India, maybe.

    The Su-35 is going to be flying in 2012. 2015 – 2016 is fair for the PAK-FA.

    See 1980s programs in the USSR as a reference.

    in reply to: PAK-FA Saga Episode 14 #2424700
    dionis
    Participant

    End of the year, or maybe beginning of 2011. That makes ~4 years (I’ve corrected 3 years – my mistake).
    Anyway – do you really believe that even when they say that deliveries will start in 2016 they will put it in active service in 2015? 😀 What about tests in the air force? I’d say that it will be a great success if the PAK-FA gets to active service before 2020.

    I may be slightly confusing with my wording.

    I think a full testing squadron will be ready in 2015.

    Full serial production might be 2016.

    The timeframe, either way, is not that unrealistic. The Su-35 “BM” was unveiled only in 2007. We are expecting it in 2012. 🙂

    in reply to: PAK-FA Saga Episode 14 #2424704
    dionis
    Participant

    Did you read that on Wikipedia?

    Anything wikipedia has would be better than what you have to offer.:rolleyes:

    Basic physics has about as much to do with stealth engineering as ballet does with kick-boxing. :rolleyes:

    Overall, since you do NOT know anything relating to news on the PAK-FA, unless you stalk the sukhoi.ru forum as a hobby and understand Russian, I would urge you to listen to others. This is blatantly obvious when you try to convince people (essentially) that the current T-50 will be what the final product looks like. Most here do listen to the Russian savvy posters, and understand that changes will occur to the platform before it is operational (2.5D TVC nozzles, RAM, new fancy blocker, etc).

    I would agree with him that the PAK-FA will be superior in most electronics to the F-35, barring the DAS and perhaps close-range electro-optical targeting system.

    in reply to: PAK-FA Saga Episode 14 #2424706
    dionis
    Participant

    Your optimism is even greater and you believe that it will be in active service only ~3 years after first flight of the second prototype. 😀

    It’s 2010. T-50 Bort 52 will fly this year. 2015 is FIVE years away.

    in reply to: PAK-FA Saga Episode 14 #2424735
    dionis
    Participant

    ….When is T-50 expected to enter service ?

    2015 should be full RuAF service. With most bells and whistles, minus the full on monster 5G engine. I would assume by this point they would have full stealth configuration too: (2.5D thrust vectoring, blocker, RAM, etc).

    in reply to: PAK-FA Saga Episode 14 #2424759
    dionis
    Participant

    I’m gonna throw another one into the wind:

    I don’t know about this obsession with calling “intake geometry” < S-ducts > … but it needs to stop.

    I think MOST people here still feel that the T-50 intake geometry is DESIGNED to LIMIT reflection. Not necessary eliminate it. No it’s not a full “S” bend, but it’s not straight either. Angles matter – or so everyone here cries, all day. Elimination will be done with the badass blocker they have planned. The one that Kapedani could design better! :rolleyes:

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part- 4 #1802384
    dionis
    Participant

    I think it’s the S-300PS. A little dated, with only 90KM range. Maybe 1/2 of Georgia, at best.

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion, Part III #2029359
    dionis
    Participant

    I believe the Sineva won’t even fit in a Borei. It’s quite a bit taller.

    in reply to: Range of R-33 Amos #1802429
    dionis
    Participant

    Vanir, what information do you have straight off from Janes?

    For all R-33 models?

    in reply to: PAK-FA Saga Episode 14 #2371425
    dionis
    Participant

    The blocker required 4 separate patents. It’s gonna be pretty interesting. And if it’s made of RAM, then you’ve got yourself that non-reflectivity you are looking for.

    Russian interviews already indicate that Russians have better RAM, weight wise, to the US – based on composition of the material.

    in reply to: Range of R-33 Amos #1802433
    dionis
    Participant

    R-33E – I thought this was some export version? It’s listed as 120KM on the Tactical Missile Corp website.

    http://eng.ktrv.ru/production_eng/323/503/510/

    If anyone has access to Jane’s, that would probably be the place to find info on the R-33 missile. Everything on the internet is ass-backwards and contradictory.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Часть 3! #2373101
    dionis
    Participant

    One PAK-FA spinoff that I see having a lot of potential for backfitting on to Flankers is the RAM blocker for the square air intakes. Being a major source of RCS I wouldn’t be surprised if Sukhoi starts marketing them for Su-27s and 30s in a few years.

    Ehehe. Blockers, canted tails, RAM.

    Silent Super Flanker. :rolleyes:

    in reply to: MiG-35 for Russian AF if India does not select it? #2373611
    dionis
    Participant

    Naah. If you aren’t into Western aircraft, & want big bang at a relatively modest up-front price, you buy Sukhoi. MiG-35 falls uneasily in the middle.

    Not if you can’t afford more than a dozen of them.

Viewing 15 posts - 391 through 405 (of 1,704 total)