dark light

dionis

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 406 through 420 (of 1,704 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: MiG-35 for Russian AF if India does not select it? #2373614
    dionis
    Participant

    There is no real market for a navalized PAKFA.

    Russia is market enough.

    in reply to: What will the 6th generation fighter look like? #2374001
    dionis
    Participant

    DEW is a long way away.

    Power, size and cost issues are going to be immense. The technology isn’t there yet.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part Deux #2374632
    dionis
    Participant

    The Su-30MKI is probably worse in T/W than any Flanker, period?

    Its TVC engines are the same thrust as the baseline Su-27 in the RuAF?

    That puts the Su-27SM and Su-35S quite a bit ahead with Al-31FM1 and Al-41-117S engines, respectively.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part Deux #2374991
    dionis
    Participant

    What a nonsense. The F-16C has a better T/W ration than the Su-35BM.

    He’s right to a pretty far extent. T/W ratio isn’t the be-all-end-all of acceleration and speed. It’s also aircraft shaping!

    AFAIK, the T/W of the Su-35BM is just a tiny tiny bit HIGHER than that of the F-16C, actually.

    in reply to: C-17 crash Alaska #2378905
    dionis
    Participant

    No survivors it seems.

    Unfortunate event .. wonder what went wrong.

    RIP pilots.

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion, Part III #2030443
    dionis
    Participant

    2-3 billions per 3 cruisers = 6-9 billions. Furthermore I donโ€™t know where are this number ($ 70 billon year to arms procurement) from. Consider that the current defense budget is $ 40 billions (nominal dollars) or $ 60 billions on a PPP basis.

    Anyway I would assume the re-entering of Kirovs will come in parallel with retirement of Slavas. Certainly this would mean the dead of the Ukrainia deal.

    No way is one cruiser costing $2-3 billion each to upgrade. That’s the total cost. They aren’t building new vessels here….

    ———-

    And I believe that $70 billion / year is ON TOP of the regularly allotted budget.This is all from Popovkin.

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion, Part III #2030476
    dionis
    Participant

    Why four Kirovs? ๐Ÿ˜ฎ I think this decision is beyond the Russian economic capability. Or just they may want to replace Slava and keep a cruiser fleet just with the Kirovs.

    $2-3 billion in 10 years is beyond the economic capability of a country that just dumped $70 extra billion / year to new arms procurement? Yeah right…

    dionis
    Participant

    Even if Iran get’s the bomb – who says they are going to use it?

    While they keep on suggesting they are going to “wipe Israel off the map” – Israel has nuclear weapons too, so it would be an unwise proposition to spark a nuclear exchange.

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion, Part III #2030797
    dionis
    Participant

    OverG — the long range land-attack is handled by the Strategic Aviation anyway, and Yasen class subs will have this ability as well.

    I wouldn’t bother wasting room on a Kirov or Slava to have TLAMs.

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion, Part III #2030908
    dionis
    Participant

    So is it now a confirmed fact that the Tu-22M3 no longer flies in the Russian Naval Aviation?

    I think it’s unconfirmed at this time. I suspect that RuAF Backfires can perform anti-shipping tasks, almost 100% certainty.

    in reply to: underestimating U.S. air power. #2383038
    dionis
    Participant

    This thread has been completely derailed now with talk focusing on nuclear weapons? At least take this USA vs China ICBM showdown to the missile forum, and try to stick with something aviation related as the main topic of discussion. This is probably the first time in a decade I’ve said something along these lines, but reading most of the above, I vomited a little bit.

    in reply to: New build gen 4.5 fighters for USAF #2383041
    dionis
    Participant

    Fly away cost-
    SE- $100 million
    Block 60- $80 million
    F-35A- $60 million

    Pfcem possessed wrightwing?

    SE –> $100m
    Block 60 –> $80m
    F-35 –> ?! $120m + ?

    in reply to: underestimating U.S. air power. #2383164
    dionis
    Participant

    jessmo is getting desperate…

    Posting pictures of something not even Hollywood dares depict yet is quite something! ๐Ÿ˜€

    in reply to: underestimating U.S. air power. #2388030
    dionis
    Participant

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHA! I’m going to sig that. I’d love to see you say that to an F-117 Gulf War vet. ๐Ÿ˜€

    Face it. As I am typing this today, stealth aircraft have the upper hand. That will likely change in the future, but right now it is not.

    Feel free to “sig” anything you want. He’s right. As far as *real* dangers go, GW1 and Kosovo were a cake walk.

    Stop twisting numbers into something you want them to be, not what they mean in reality with all things taken into consideration.

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion, Part III #2032235
    dionis
    Participant

    Thanks… not being able to read it I assume the 15-20km figure is for active detection and 40-60km for passive detection. Or is the first figure for towed array and second for hull-mounted sonar?

    How does it compare to the MGK-335 Platina and MGK-345 Bronza in specs? I’ve heard mention of the Platina’s max range being 40km.

    You got it backwards for active/passive.

Viewing 15 posts - 406 through 420 (of 1,704 total)