No one here knows squat about how many missiles the T-50 is going to carry internally. All artists and self-proclaimed experts included.

http://www.balancer.ru/sites/i/c/ic.pics.livejournal.com/kuleshovoleg/28256301/465944/465944_1000.jpg

Nice photo of the mighty Severodvinsk!

Still didn’t sink huh? Those Australian “experts” have some serious thinking to do… 😀

They gonna bomb Russia all night!

Su-35 project (before it got “S”, but not the soviet one) was originally heavily accented on lowering RCS. That could be flexible depending on the customers wish.

There’s a number of sources that state that the Su-35S and Su-34 have reduced RCS when compared to the baseline Su-27.

Simonov was quoted somewhere as having said that the Su-34 actually had extensive RCS reduction work done.

I guess the combat radius of Tu-22M3 with 2 kh-22 is around 2000 km, with mixed military and afterburner on the weapons deployment phase.

The problem of the Tu-22M3 is not range or speed, but obtain target information from the Tu-142 which will certainly get hit by CBG before passing any information to the Tu-22M3. And, the Kh-22 is not that impressive weapon. I have a link that talked about the disadvantage of high velocity, high projectile weapons such as the kh-22. Surface heating on the sensors of Kh-22 during high speed is one of its problem.

Good thing the NPO Raduga took the time to develop the Kh-32, which is reputed to have a range of over 800KM and a ceiling of up to 44KM based on a Yefim Gordon article that I recall.

It’s a J-11B.

…. unless you knew that and were being ironic….

Ken

What? That’s clearly a grey Su-27 😡

I would like to say that This is not a stealth aircraft, but the king of the 4th generation machine, Russia did not design stealth aircraft, you only masturbation on the forum, I did not say that T50 ill, but he is too rubbish, howare like the shot flat of the SU 27, and wearing pants, rough skin unbearable, the hungry refugees like flat, did not say I said, in addition to the Russian people, the world say

panman.. you might be on the something here. You should contact Sukhoi immediately and tell them your tale. They will be shocked to know that they have basically recreated the Su-35 instead of a next generation aircraft. Hurry, panman.. hurry!

Now you are going to the extreme, but on the other side.

Asking an open-ended question is the other extreme? Great logic for sure.

They have became much more self-sufficient than they were 2 decades ago. I think this was the goal, nothing else.

In the last 20 years they have got their hands on active AAMs, slotted array radars, combat and support helicopters, sniper rifles, night vision, subs, destroyers, support vessels, space rockets, even an aircraft carrier. Now they start to mess with 4th gen engines, AESA, 5th gen airframes..

In a way they can make almost everything today. Good, more than a half of that is just licensed and copied stuff slapped together with few indigenous mods (like Z-19 or all those funny H-6s…) but who cares? It works and is readily available for use.. Ain’t that much? In my opinion it is.

It’s certainly pretty good compared to some other nations when looked at individually – I don’t need to name any, there are hundreds of them. Compared to military-tech powerhouses like the Russia or the US they have effectively no history of producing comparable weaponry.