dark light

dionis

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 496 through 510 (of 1,704 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion, Part III #2035910
    dionis
    Participant

    It shows 5 torp ports of the same size.

    Then how is it going to launch Kh-101 missiles? Hmm, not through the Yakhont VLS tubes… but through the 650mm tubes, which it will have I am sure.

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion, Part III #2035957
    dionis
    Participant

    To believe or not is your option. I prefer to know, not believe.;)

    What is your image showing? And what is your point?!

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion, Part III #2035981
    dionis
    Participant

    Sounds like garbage.

    Kazan-M is a modernized Yasen. It may be expensive, and around 10 may be built in total through say 2025, but it will be built.

    As far as another nuclear attack sub – we’ll have to see.

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion, Part III #2036024
    dionis
    Participant

    533mm tubes only? I don’t think so.

    I’m pretty certain most of the tubes are 650mm, and can be retrofitted w/ 533mm kits and munitions.

    in reply to: PAK-FA Saga Episode 13 #2417809
    dionis
    Participant

    Pfcem, your feeble mind obviously cannot imagine things in a 3-dimensional manner. I think I could explain this to a 10 year old better than you.

    And your link that you don’t want to repost doesn’t exist. It was merely a suggestion from someone here based on what they heard elsewhere IIRC.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part Deux #2417891
    dionis
    Participant

    RuAF to receive new AWACS based on the Il-476

    Russian Air Force will receive new flying radar
    Russian Air Force will get new aircraft airborne patrol, detection and guidance, which is being developed at the Taganrog Aviation and Technical Complex named after Beriev, reported on June 14, Interfax, citing an unnamed source in the military-industrial complex.

    “To date, nearly completed the documentation,” – source said, adding that the first aircraft to be built no earlier than two years.

    As assured source of new aircraft will be “significantly exceed” standing on the Russia Air Force A-50 and A-50EI manufactured for supply to India. The first aircraft will be developed on the basis of the Il-76MD, but in future it will replace the new aircraft, while known as “the product 476. The interviewee said that in addition to direct aircraft, “everything else, including the Radio Complex, where the new”.

    Flying Radar A-50 was first commissioned in 1985. Now armed with the Russian Air Force are 19 such planes. In January 2010 it was reported that India intends to buy from Russia, three A-50EI with the possible purchase of six more, earlier, India has bought three more such planes, two of which have been delivered.

    New A-50 type AWACS is being tested for the Russian Air Force. Above is the Google translation.

    in reply to: PAK-FA Saga Episode 13 #2418252
    dionis
    Participant

    Have Sukhoi/KnAAPO/RusAF (anyone?) actually published any firm dimensions yet ??

    I haven’t seen any – so if we don’t even know the size of the damn thing – what is the point of arguing about its intakes ??? 😮

    ‘Guesstimations’ of the wingspan range from 13.5 to 15m – do we know yet what it really is???

    Or – have I missed something ??

    Ken

    14.6m I believe was derived using the wheel size and a little trigonometry. 😉

    in reply to: PAK-FA Saga Episode 13 #2418503
    dionis
    Participant

    I’m sure that some form of a blocker will be used, I’m just curious to here anything that’s more on the official side. Not to mention a better photo of the intake (if that’ll ever happen).

    in reply to: PAK-FA Saga Episode 13 #2418726
    dionis
    Participant

    Posted earlier in THIS TREAD. Do try to keep up.

    THEN FIND IT! My life does not revolve around keeping tabs on crap around this forum. You clearly seem to know where it is.:rolleyes:

    The inside & bottom edges of the engines & intakes are in line, but the intakes mouths are wider (horizontally) & shorter (vertically) than the engines.

    The engine housing will be larger than the actual compressor assembly. This is why it’s likely that a good amount of it is hidden, if in fact, is is towed in towards the center of the aircraft.

    in reply to: PAK-FA Saga Episode 13 #2418805
    dionis
    Participant

    Which could lead to a tail strike hazard due to high AoA, however. Maybe a telescopic hook?

    If it could be made really damn strong, that’s an excellent idea 😀

    in reply to: PAK-FA Saga Episode 13 #2418915
    dionis
    Participant

    Better expand that tailboom and keep the thing hidden for stealth retention.

    in reply to: PAK-FA Saga Episode 13 #2419049
    dionis
    Participant

    No, is not simple, IMO

    The bomb bay is actually exposed to some sort of deformation, unless the designers make a isolated structure for the hook, well this actually depends on many factors, but sure wont be ‘simple’

    What deformation? What are you talking about? The structure/hook can be reinforced to the part of the main upper frame.

    in reply to: PAK-FA Saga Episode 13 #2419063
    dionis
    Participant

    Wonder if the landing gear design was intended for carrier operations, the Su-47 was actually intended for it, if i recall well.

    Now the next problem , as somebody else pointed out, is where the arrestor should be placed, since the bomb bay is actually placed in the normal location, and how the russians will solve the load distribution for any arrestor located just behind the bomb bay…

    Simple IMO.

    Mount it in the tail boom, and if necessary, extend it slightly to accomodate the arrestor hook. No need for a drogue-chute either, and even without one, you can land on a runway.

    in reply to: PAK-FA Saga Episode 13 #2419077
    dionis
    Participant

    What are the multiple light sources?

    in reply to: PAK-FA Saga Episode 13 #2419198
    dionis
    Participant

    The designer has already said that the current test aircraft is not fitted with the radar blocker intended for the production/service aircraft.

    Link?

    Funny how that pic shows the inside edge of the engine nacelle/cowling to be more-or-less in line with the LEVCON root.

    “More or less” doesn’t cut it. It’s off-angle with the center of the intake. That’s my only reason for questions at this point.

Viewing 15 posts - 496 through 510 (of 1,704 total)