dark light

dionis

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 796 through 810 (of 1,704 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion Thread Part II #2041557
    dionis
    Participant

    No they wont.

    No ship of that displacement will have anything even close to the punch of SS-N-26s or Kashtans. Not even close. The Uragan is a toss up, but since it’s no cruiser or destroyer, it suffices.

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part-3 #1819948
    dionis
    Participant

    While an 800kT warhead is more powerful than a 550kT warhead, it’s not that big of a deal in the grand scheme of things. The 20 megaton warhead isn’t going to be your bunker buster, either. It’ll be a field killer, given that there are small numbers in service, or alternatively a city killer. The silo/bunker killers will be the most accurate weapons typically. Back in the 60s and 70s you would have used a bigger warhead for a silo/bunker killer to get over accuracy issues, but nowadays you don’t need such a warhead for that purpose. Significant accuracy increases mean that you can put a much smaller warhead close enough to a hardened silo or bunker to get a kill.

    City destruction is much better with MIRVs littering an area.

    The 20MT warheads are specifically for hard targets. The SS-18 new mods are sufficiently accurate for this.

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion Thread Part II #2041776
    dionis
    Participant

    These are budget ships.

    Admiral Sergei Gorshkov class frigates will be of much higher level.

    With Yakhont battery, Kashtan and Uragan, they will be far better armed than any Frigate in service.

    in reply to: Indian navy – news & discussion #2041857
    dionis
    Participant

    Hahaha yeah the free world guided by the US, insured by guided munitions which kill the local populace at weddings and what not. :rolleyes:

    dionis
    Participant

    A MiG-15 takes off, & doesn’t come back, you know you lost it.

    No you don’t LOL! :rolleyes:

    in reply to: A new RuAF news thread #2448765
    dionis
    Participant

    Well, you would think the Russian would make there best customer (India) a priority…..you’d think!:rolleyes:

    Or you would think that they would let themselves (their actual best customer) take priority. Durr.. :rolleyes:

    in reply to: A new RuAF news thread #2449224
    dionis
    Participant

    Well, you would think the Russian would make there best customer (India) a priority…..you’d think!:rolleyes:

    Or you would think that they would let themselves (their actual best customer) take priority. Durr.. :rolleyes:

    in reply to: A new RuAF news thread #2450052
    dionis
    Participant

    Well, if the members of the forum had a dollar for every Russian promise. We would all be rich…………..Just ask the Indians.:(

    I didn’t know the Russians were Indians.

    What sort of lack of logic is this? (On your part, now I’ll let you figure it out)

    in reply to: A new RuAF news thread #2450094
    dionis
    Participant

    LOL @ Scooter whining for an article about signatures.

    😀

    in reply to: US Aircraft Carrier Vulnerable #2043000
    dionis
    Participant

    What the Russians could easily do is shoot a group of nuclear armed missiles in first, have them air burst detonate at a safe yet effective EMP range perhaps – crippling the CVBG’s ability to detect anything, then pummel away with the rest of the payload.

    in reply to: LM about the F-35s A2A performance #2450872
    dionis
    Participant

    Well thats good if you have some proper proof to that claim, unlike the childlike abuse from Otaku who couldn’t back his own claim up.
    Of course now he has claimed this I can now step in and use the fine logic straight from one of this forum members and say that its garbage, reason being that if a company has to hype up or defend its product its clearly a poor product, after all “The logic is obvious – if something really flies perfectly, then you don’t need to defend it, at all
    crap needs marketing.. ” taken from post number 458.

    Proof of the claim is up to you, go google for the Pogosyan interviews from that airshow. I’d actually like to see them myself again.

    Edit: Well look what I found here!

    http://www.defence.pk/forums/military-photos-multimedia/12841-russians-view-f-22-farnborough-flight-demo.html

    in reply to: LM about the F-35s A2A performance #2450947
    dionis
    Participant

    Can you throw us some proof to that claim?

    Pogosyan, while at the UK airshow with the F-22, said that “while the SU-35BM isn’t a match for the Raptor, the PAK-FA will be.”

    He also claimed he wasn’t impressed by its maneuverability, and said the Su-35BM matched it there.

    in reply to: US Aircraft Carrier Vulnerable #2043111
    dionis
    Participant

    No armor plating is going to stop a 300+ KG warhead flying in at mach 2+ from doing serious damage.

    God forbid something like a Granit / Vulkan / Kh-32 impact that deck.

    dionis
    Participant

    any of these aircraft still viable today’s environment and in the next 15 years?
    seeing as how everyone is drifting to multirole..

    MiG-31
    Tornado ADV
    Tornado Gr.4
    Tornado ECR
    Su-34
    JH-7
    F-2
    Growler

    The MiG-31BM and Su-34 are multi-role. The MiG-31BM might not be a dogfighter, but is quite amazing in an anti-radar role and remain feasible for high speed intercepts. The Su-34 retains much of the maneuverability of the Su-27 series, so it can be used for A2A in a pinch.

    By Growler you mean EW Hornet? Then that’s a dedicated platform for electronic warfare, and that’s not going anywhere anytime soon.

    in reply to: LM about the F-35s A2A performance #2451686
    dionis
    Participant

    I think the problem here is not that Russia is not capable of building a very capable and stealthy 5th Generation Fighter.The point is to do so considering the lack of funding after the break up of the former Soviet Union. Russia would have to make a commitment on the scale of the Manhattan Project to catch up. Which, from the available sources has not even come close……

    Let’s not forget that Russian Military can’t afford to scrap old rusting nuclear submarines, upgrade old aircraft, buy new aircraft, or build any major fleet units. Yet, we are to believe she can match the US great lead in Stealth Technology…………..:confused:

    Yes, duh, as they have matched or surpassed the US before.

Viewing 15 posts - 796 through 810 (of 1,704 total)