The Allied Forces won the War…………including a not so little War in Pacific. Which, Russia hardly played a part in.;)
I’m sure you like to fantasize at night about how the Pacific theater was more important than the European one. :rolleyes:
I’d like to see the United States provide Georgia with an effective air defense network that includes THAAD and a nuclear reactor that’s capable of enriching Uranium for nuclear weapons as well. Turnabout is fair play.;)
If the United States did provide Georgia with F-22’s and F-35’s as well as training for their pilots, the russians would be wise to not f0ck with them. The russian air force is just too poorly trained and too inexperienced in modern air to air warfare to take on a modern, well-trained foe. Their pilots rarely fly and aside from some dog fighting in the Korean war and some aerial warfare involving civilian airliners, they really haven’t done much air-to-air work since WWII. That, combined with technologically inferior weaponry would spell disaster for the russian air force.
Hahahahahahahah.
This is classic, I wish I could put it all in a sig.
If, you don’t mind using your troops as cannon fodder………..:eek:
Whine about it all you want, the USSR won the war.
German military losses: 10 million.
Soviet military losses: 20 million.
USSR wins.
Numbers don’t mean squat by themselves.
So, since WWII you believe Russian/Soviet Designs have claimed more combat kills than there Western Counterparts???
Just so we are straight on the facts………:D
The numbers don’t tell the whole story, and you know that.
You can’t really compare as conflicts were never fought with equal terms. The USSR was far more peaceful than the US – ironic isn’t it?
The US/NATO did a great job of bombing a lot of people back into the stone age, nations that couldn’t really defend themselves. The USSR pulled that off in Afghanistan to top it off, but Vietnam/Korea/Afghanistan/Iraq/etc don’t really tell us much of anything.
The problem with your statement is that its more speculation than fact. While, you can make many claims. The facts are US and/or Western Fighters have a distinct advantage in kills to losses vs there Russian or former Soviet Counter Parts.
With all do respect……..;)
Sure they do, and it means nothing for reasons you clearly (conveniently) ignore.
If you don’t understand – well, you lack intelligence. Your call.
Second point, russian avionics (sensor and ECM) are widely inferior than the western state of the art.
This is something you came up with in your sleep?
Or do you have some extensive evidence (preferably with numbers) to back this prejudiced crap up with?
The point isn’t has a Russian Aircraft every shot down a American or for that matter a Western Fighter. But what is the ratio…………..:diablo:
The ratio doesn’t tell the reality you think exists LOL. :rolleyes:
I want the US to give Georgia F-22s and F-35s, and then we’ll have a look at the “ratios” – which would be of lots of destroyed Georgian aircraft and few for the Russians – which really, the Russians would have destroyed probably still on Georgian airfields – which, really, wouldn’t tell us much of anything either, much like your loved ratios.
I keep coming across the word ‘Dry’ in these translated reports but I can’t figure out what it’s actually being translated from. Is it KnAAPO? UAC? Or something else entirely?
LOL!
Sukhoi = Dry
Edit: Flex beat me to it 🙁
Is there anything Russian-Indian that you don’t whine about?
Big talk no money.
When seen as a system , Brahmos being a high supersonic all the way has the best chance to penetrate than any subsonic or partly subsonic system
Errm, no.
The Klub is smaller due to less fuel on board (likely), making it harder to detect, and also flies lower.
If you know where the target is, subsonic initially is completely fine. As long as the missile is supersonic when the detection range approaches.
You get WW3 with ICBM fun and games
This seems to go against the flow of what is being suggested here.
According to what’s been said so far, if it’s military targets it’s all fair for no ICBM action.
Agree here completely.
And what if the Russians start lobbing tactical nukes at US Navy groups?
Flow testing to determine the sonar signature?
On a related note, is this class fitted with Yakhont?
And the KH-101/102 I believe. VLS system included. Wonder how many tubes.
Sure as hell better be a lot to even come close to the Oscar II.