dark light

viscount

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 226 through 240 (of 407 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Hawker Hunter on the A40 into London #973162
    viscount
    Participant
    in reply to: W & R lookup please. #987449
    viscount
    Participant

    I looked at this site and could not find any mention. Seems the history must have been on the web all along! Well done ‘Skyskooter’. Devils own to get the PC to open up the full account, which provides quite a decent history.

    The listing is attributed to David Taskis. I’ve expanded on some of the abbreviations and place references. Also towards the end needed correct the history, mostly based on facts uncovered on posts in this thread.

    VZ962 with C/no WA/H/021 built by Westlands at Yeovil, UK as a WS-51 Dragonfly HR.1. First Flight 18th May 1950.
    Delivered to RNAS Gosport 13th October 1950.
    With 705 NAS (Naval Air Squadron) based at RNAS Gosport, by November 1950.
    Suffered a Cat.5 accident during 1952. Repaired by Westlands and uprated to HR.3 during 1953
    With 705 NAS again, known to have been coded 703:GJ by February 1954.
    Tail rotor clipped ground 9th July 1954. Repaired at RNAY Donibristle by August 1955. Back to 705 NAS at Gosport.
    To Lee-on-Solent by October 1956 for conversion to HR.5 standard
    With RNAS Brawdy Station Flight, coded 904:BY by March 1958
    At RNAY Fleetlands by September 1961 after Cat.4 accident. Not returned to flying status.
    To Whale Island for blast trials, where further damage was sustained. (In Portsmouth Harbour, Navy Command Headquarters, HMS.Excellent).
    To BRNC at Norton Helicopter Station, Dartmouth by August 1964 for Ground Instructional use. Uncoded.
    Struck Off Charge September 1964.
    At RNEC Manadon between June 1968 and August 1972. (RNEC = Royal Naval Engineering College, near Plymouth. HMS.Thunderer)
    Returned to BRNC at Norton helicopter Station, Dartmouth. (BRNC = Britannia Royal Naval College. HMS.Dartmouth)
    To Cornwall Aero Park, Helston in September 1981 and marked 912:CU (This last part of the entry is incorrect, the 50’s schemed Dragonfly on public display at Helston was marked ‘WG754‘ coded 912:CU (really WG725), as far as I am aware VZ962 was never restored for public display).
    To British Rotorcraft Museum, Weston-Super-Mare by 1990 (our research above shows the year to actually be 1987 and entered store with the ‘reserve collection’ of the IHM, rather than BRM)
    To Malta, date needed (our research above shows transported mid 2011 from the IHM to Malta for restoration by the Malta Air Museum)

    Unlike RAF Record Cards which list each change of unit as a single record, for FAA machines the history has to be put together from various records. Use of the word ‘by’ stands for ‘on or before’ and is the earliest mention found, although the helicopter could have arrived months before, or just days. Codes worn are usually from observation as they are not officially recorded.

    To ‘Lynx815’ – is the history you have in Lee Howard’s book the same as the above ? Appears Lee does not notice he has PMs! (much easier to miss on the newlay out).

    This is as good as it gets, unless Lee Howard can come up with more information.

    Glad we have got this one sorted out, as ‘Lion Rock’ has been asking on several different threads over a period of time. Hope this is what he wanted!

    in reply to: Avro 748 Sisyphus Safe And Secure At Liverpool #992134
    viscount
    Participant

    The name ‘Sisyphus’ can be clearly seen applied to the nose of Avro 748 G-BEJD, a few posts up on the only photo on this page of the thread.

    G-BEJD was initially named ‘John Case’ by Emerald Airways 7.93, and survived a repaint 12.94 into Reed Aviation (a newspaper freight consolidators) scheme until sometime after mid ’95. Renamed ‘Sisyphus’ certainly before early 2000. Still worn on retirement April 2005 at Blackpool, indeed still clearly visible today at Liverpool – although not for much longer as the aircraft is likely to be repainted in it’s earlier Dan Air scheme shortly.

    Sisyphus is a character in Greek mythology – a King of Cornith, punished for chronic deceitfulness by being compelled to roll an immense boulder up a hill, only to watch it roll back down, and to repeat this action for ever. Not too unlike Reed’s daily task of carrying newspapers to Northern Ireland from Liverpool!

    in reply to: Second A350 Leaves Final Assembly #507002
    viscount
    Participant

    Providing the flight testing progresses to schedule, then the rumour ‘up north’ is that the A.350 will display at Hawarden, en route to Farnborough July 2014. Although the date I’ve seen is a Sunday (the 6th), the A.380 did appear a few years back at a weekend Wirral event en route to Farnborough to show off to the Chester workfirce, so there is a precedent set.

    in reply to: Paint Colours for Classic Dan Air Livery ? #996387
    viscount
    Participant

    A little confused here.

    I tend to think of the dark maroon red broad cheat (with black edging) and tail with Davies & Newman flag in a white circle as the ‘classic’ scheme. The thinner red and blue cheats rising below the window line to sweep up the tail as the ‘new’ ‘final’ or ‘last’ scheme. Others could well think of the older (‘initial’) white tail with two horizontal lines as the ‘classic’ scene (as on the York at Duxford). For me at least, can you clarify which scheme you are looking for on the HS.748?

    The National Museum of Scotland (or a group working for them) repainted the Dan Air Comet at East Fortune a few years back in the red tail scheme. Cannot think of any Dan Air aircraft preserved in the final red and blue scheme. Are you also looking for drawings of the rather complex flag that is part on the fin and part on the rudder? Suspect there could well be left and right handed versions due to the rudder split.

    I’ve got slides galore of Dan Air aircraft, but can I find good ones when I need them to illustrate – not a chance!

    in reply to: W & R lookup please. #999701
    viscount
    Participant

    According to W&R23 2012 (yes, we are back with the book that started this thread) VZ962 departed to Malta from the IHM reserve collection store at Weston-Super-Mare mid 2011. Looking at some of the web photos of the Dragonfly while at Weston-s-Mare, she was in poor condition prior to export.

    in reply to: W & R lookup please. #999755
    viscount
    Participant

    Have sent a PM to Lee Howard alerting him to this (now misleadingly named) thread, in the hope that he can help. Thanks ‘Wyvernfan’ for providing a name to go with my memories of reading past threads. Hopefully we are getting there.

    in reply to: W & R lookup please. #1000196
    viscount
    Participant

    Although ‘Wrecks & Relics’ has helped to confirm and put dates to VZ962’s movements around the UK since retirement, it has been of no help in tracing the information that ‘Lion Rock’ really desires, which is the aircraft’s service history 1951 to early ’60s

    Does anyone know the Royal Navy service history for Westland WS-51 Dragonfly HR.1 VZ962 ??

    Certainly it must have been researched by someone! Were Dragonfly histories detailed in ‘Helicopters of the Fleet Air Arm’ Air Britain (or similar title), published a fair few years ago? Indeed I seem to recall that someone involved in the production of this work used to contribute here on the mammoth ding-dong debate threads discussing the shade of red that was ‘day-glo’ red (no, don’t start that subject again!). Equally David Taskis of Hornchurch on a helicopter website details other Dragonfly service histories, so surely knows VZ962 too? I’ve tried to contact him via that site’s e-mail message system, but with no contact (as yet). Was there ever an Air Britain VZ… serials monograph? I know the answer to Lion Rock’s question is out there, and that the Malta Museum really deserve to know about the service background of a helicopter that they are actively restoring.

    in reply to: E.E. Lightning Numbers #1001574
    viscount
    Participant

    Although always a source to be used with a certain degree of scepticism, Wikipedia also quotes the 337 figure.

    Production figures for military aircraft are notoriously tricky to pin down exactly – even if you were at the hangar doors counting them out!!

    in reply to: E.E. Lightning Numbers #1002072
    viscount
    Participant

    Quick google finds 337 (typo amended from 377 having read next post!) as an answer – but I bet other sources come up with different answers! The real trick is to work out precisely which source is the absolutely correct one!

    An answer is in the final few lines of this webpage:

    http://www.militaryfactory.com/aircraft/detail.asp?aircraft_id=229

    in reply to: American Airlines Boeing 757 200's #507632
    viscount
    Participant

    With the registrations, the previous operators and dates are easily traceable through publications and websites – should you really wish to know more about the age and operators that is!

    in reply to: W & R lookup please. #1005806
    viscount
    Participant

    My older copies of W&R simply state: BRNC, Helston, Weston-super-Mare. BRNC = Britannia Royal Naval College, a training establishment at Dartmouth in Devon. Helston = location of Cornwall Aero Park (this was the name in the 1984 edition, Flambards came later). Also looked in Ken Ellis’s ‘British Museum Aircraft’ 1977, but this appears too early for VZ962 to have been at Helston -while his more recent ‘Lost Aircraft Museums of Britain’ 2011 does not include that collection. Unfortunately for you, it is much more difficult to trace the unit histories, codes etc for FAA aircraft than it is for RAF ones due to the way records were kept.

    Inserted later on edit No mention in W&R2 1963. Loaned out and lost W&R3. W&R4 1974, W&R5 1976, W&R6 1978 (with small b&w photo) and W&R 7 1980 all state that VZ962 Dragonfly HR.1 continues to act an instructional airframe with the BRNC at Norton Helicopter Station. W&R8 1982 states that VZ862 arrived at Helson late 1981 from the BRNC at Norton Helicopter Station at Dartmouth. W&R9 1984 and W&R10 1986 both state still with Cornwall Aero Park. At this stage I become no longer involved in the production/sales of W&R, so my next copy is W&R14 1994 by which time Cornwall Aero Park is now Flambards Village Theme Park and VZ962 has moved to the International Helicopter Museum at Weston-Super-Mare as a donor of spares, rather than an exhibit. I note that information from ‘Skyskooter’ in an earlier reply provides a date for the move from Helston to Weston as 1987. I don’t know exactly when Cornwall Aero Park became Flambards Village Theme Park, perhaps ‘Skyskooter’ could look at his W&R11 1988 again and report what the entry for Helston states about the name of the museum there?

    I have a note that I saw VZ962 in a hangar at BRNC Dartmouth on 8th August 1966. I recorded VZ962/-, WG709/96, WG719/97, WG750/95 all Dragonflys, no camera in those days though. BRNC also had Tiger Moths and Chipmunks flown from Roborough/Plymouth Airport. BRNC has an entry on Wikipedia as the RN initial officers training school.

    Have a feeling that the fairly recent Air Britain book on the Helicopters of the Fleet Air Arm would be a better source of information than W&R – but I don’t have one (indeed never examined one), so I pass the task on to someone who has …… Was there ever a VZ… Serials monograph from Air Britain?

    I note that on a website http://www.helis.com that a contributor ‘Dave Taskis’ of Hornchurch, Essex clearly has access to outline FAA Dragonfly in-service histories. Anyone able to draw his attention to this thread?

    Dare I suggest it on this forum, but perhaps someone who has access to Air Britain aix information exchange members forum, might re-post your enquiry there, then inform us if there are any positive replies.

    I don’t like the idea of an enterprising and dynamic aviation museum not knowing the history of their particular airframe, which they are working hard on preserving. Somehow I suspect that between entry into service October 1950 and becoming an instructional airframe with BRNC this helicopter probably had quite an active career in the days when helicopters operating from ships was still very much in its infancy!

    Perhaps a change of thread title (on ‘edit’) to ‘Looking into history of VZ962 Dragonfly HR.1’ would help as ‘W&R Look-up please’ is clearly not reaching the right people to come up with the information you desire, although hopefully has added a little to your knowledge and dates of the machine’s whereabouts since retirement.

    in reply to: Thanks to all the photographers #440682
    viscount
    Participant

    As stated, everyone to their own rules. For myself I wish to count only aircraft I can clearly see – so have a limit of around circuit height foe ‘tiddlers’, couple of thousand feet for airliners. Knew a spotter who would only count an aircraft when he could see the wheels!

    A further consideration is those who count the current displayed registration verses those who count the airframe (as identified by c/no.). ‘Paint Scrapes’ is a recent addition to our vocabulary.

    As for binoculars, sorry, way out of date. A decent SLR with a 300mm or larger lens, with digital zoom-in on the PC provides not only massively greater magnification, but also time to leisurely consider colour scheme etc – indeed, with a steady hand (or tripod assisted) it is quite possible to read off an underwing regn of a trailing airliner some 30,000ft up! Something near impossible even with a powerful ‘pole’ or monocular.

    Yes, the hobby has moved on. While the note-pad equipped ‘die-hard’ all-weather “spotter” on an Airport Balcony (what a great social place they were at MAN, LHR, LGW, LPL etc) may be an ageing breed (habitat destroyed) there is renewed interest in aviation as an enthusiast due to Flight Sim programmes and followers of FlightRadar24 and similar, even down to use of point and identify Mobile Phone Aps.

    How I wished I had a digital camera in the 60s and 70s. To take more than a dozen shots at an Air Display was considered outrageously extravagant, and that was before weeding out poorly exposed shots, camera shake and scratched film. How did we ever manage?

    How the Internet has changed things. Back in the ’80s as a regional Aviation Society we had around 500 to 600 members and a monthly magazine that relied heavily on a core of 20 or so enthusiasts to produce. Today, the direct descendant of that Aviation Society, although now run by individuals not a committee, still produces monthly movements for our ‘base’ airport on a website and runs a forum visited daily by over 100 logged-in members plus over 1000 guest visits, with 20 to 40 posts daily covering a wide variety of topics. Well gone are the days of always having small change, and a list of ‘mates’ telephone numbers to ring (from a call-box, also now near extinct!), if something interesting should turn up to be seen from the balcony.

    Great thread this for reflecting on how time (and technology) have changed the hobby, but not our delight in all things aviation.

    in reply to: Hurricane replica mystery #936419
    viscount
    Participant

    In answer to a question raised several posts ago (#20), that no one yet has attempted a reply to.

    The B.A.P.C. (British Aircraft Preservation Council) “Register” is more of a listing of otherwise anonymous airframes, most without any Constructor’s identity or official registration. Unlike most ‘National’ registers which rely on an application from the owner before issuing a registration, the BAPC listing is mostly as the result of active research seeking our likely candidates – although some are as a result of BAPC group members wishing to provide an identity for their exhibit (today insurers love an identity). The ‘histories’ of the aircraft on the register are mostly put together by enthusiasts/historians rather than the ‘allocator and keeper’ of additions of the register. Very few BAPC registered aircraft carry their identity – I’m told though that several of the Newark Air Museum in the UK, exhibits do (which no doubt will rapidly be confirmed/denied by ‘Twin Otter’). The register would work best if airframes had to have a metal identity plate riveted on (effectively replacing the constructors plate) – but that is not the case.

    The ‘keeper’ of the BAPC Register has changed over the years, started by Bob Ogden, then Doug Revell and by the early ’80s Ken Ellis, going on through a number of keepers since, the names of whom I’ve not kept up with. The register is still active, with recent additions. Although the criteria for inclusion has changed little, the enthusiasm for seeking out candidates has varied with time. The register now records over 300 otherwise identity-less originals, restorations, replicas, full scale models etc. Quite when the register was first started, I’m uncertain, but the B.A.P.C. was formed in 1967 and by 1978 the register recorded 124 airframes. There is a BAPC website: http://www.bapc.org.uk/

    Hope this helps. I was involved ‘on the fringe’ during the early ’80s, but have lost touch since. The two places I look to for the register allocations in print are Ian Allan’s (now Midland) annual Civil Aircraft Markings and with a new edition on ‘even’ years of Crecy’s Wreck & Relics by Ken Ellis.

    in reply to: Amazing childishness at Redhill #393601
    viscount
    Participant

    Moggy, without knowledge of Redhill Aerodrome, with no background information the above post is for me meaningless, let alone forum readers from Canada and New Zealand etc. ‘The Hub’ could be anything from a snack bar to a biz-jet FBO (exadurating here as I do know that Redhill is all grass), while ARL = what? Aviation Redhill Ltd? Why is Hangar 9 so important?

    While I do find these discussions regarding GA provision (eg at Sandown) interesting to read, understanding helps too! Even I don’t know everything!

Viewing 15 posts - 226 through 240 (of 407 total)