dark light

viscount

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 286 through 300 (of 407 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Help on posting images #443792
    viscount
    Participant

    ‘Autostick’ while I agree with you to a degree, when viewing a forum I personally much prefer to view images that come out automatically near pull page (1024 pixels or similar resizing before posting), than thum-nails that only double in size when clicked over and are still too small to see detail.

    As to quality, if the image is interesting and worthwhile, then a slight lack of sharpness or exposure does not matter greatly. However with a little gentle massaging using Picasa or Photoshop etc to crop, straighten, sharpen or adjust contrast it is amazing how picture quality improves. I’ve recently been working with old b&w prints and am amazed how 10 minutes max on Picasa produces a really acceptable photo from the most horrid pale and creased print.

    In answer to OG, the very last section of the link should be [/img] and no colon: When you do that it certainly works, nice photo of Gatwick in the days of DC-10s and Air Florida.

    Yes, photobucket has changed recently to make posts more secure (you can no longer enter and view all of another person’s library). That is one of the reasons I described the steps in such a basic fashion.

    in reply to: Help on posting images #443807
    viscount
    Participant

    Step by step at a pace hopefully lower than your actual computing skills!! Also assuming you have a photobucket account and have photos uploaded into your ‘library’ and are a member of The Aviation forum.

    Set computer up with two internet windows active, one open on Keyforum thread and ‘post reply’ box open, other open in your Photobucket account.

    In your Photobucket ‘Library’ of thumb-nail images, locate and click once over image selected. To the right of the enlarged single image, there are 4 options. Select ‘Direct Link’ and left click over once, shows briefly in yellow as ‘copied’.

    Swop over onto Forum window. In the ‘Post reply’ window type in , then with a right click, and 'paste' the image code from Photobucket, then type ] (only one square bracket, if I do that here correctly, part of the message disappears!). On this forum, IMG can be in capitals or lower case img.

    Repeat as often as is required to complete post.

    When I remember to, I always use ‘Review Post’ option on completion to check my links have actually worked and the post is as I desire it. When satisfied all is well, then ‘post’.

    There is a more direct way by selecting from the options above the ‘Post reply’ window – the one that looks like a picture postcard with a yellow mountain scene and stamp. This brings up another little window in which you copy & paste the image code. However when I do it that way (which works well on another forum I’m involved with) on this forum it introduces into the code an extra http//: so the image link does not work.

    Thats how I do it, anyone use a different method? – there are frequently two ways of doing many windows tasks. I’m on Windows 7, as I suspect many are, don’t know if other operating programmes differ.

    OK, all this seems long-winded, but after a few posts and the actions become second-nature, loading photos is a routine task.

    Look forward to viewing your images – hopefully might encourages others to post photos too!!

    in reply to: Our Strikemaster: Anyone have pictures or history?? #958611
    viscount
    Participant

    BAe.167 Strikemaster Mk.84, customer’s serial number 314, built by BAe. at Warton (Preston) 1970.

    Built as Strikemaster plane set PS.151 (sequence started at PS101), on the production line known as line number S.15 (ie 15th aircraft for Singapore). The number ‘Mexicanbob’ quotes EEP/JP/1934 translates as ‘English Electric Preston’ (the factory name prior to amalgamation into British Aerospace),the JP as ‘Jet Provost’ (the type the Strikemaster was developed from), ‘1934’ a number which is likely just a fuselage assembly number (the wings or tail could in theory have a different EEP number!). Anyone explain the significance of the number 1934? The BAe factory at Warton still produces aircraft today assembling the UK Typhoon FGR.4 for the R.A.F. and before that the Tornado and more recently the Hawk T.2.

    Line number S.15 first flew in late July 1970, or more likely early August 1970, from the airfield at BAe. Warton (north bank of the River Ribble between Preston and Blackpool). For the first flight, almost certainly still in construction line ‘yellow’ protective primer coating, the aircraft was marked as G-27-143 (a British ‘B’ conditions, manufacturer’s test registration). G-27 being allocated to BAe. at Warton, -143 being the sequence number reached at that time.

    At that time I was a student studying in the Blackpool area and a regular term-time visitor to the boundary fence at Warton – however due exams and holidays was at home July to September at the time G-27-143 was test flying, so cannot tie down roll-out or first flight down with any greater certainty. As a ‘poor’ student I had no camera at that time either.

    After initial test flying the aircraft was sprayed at Warton in camouflage scheme as 314, in full Singapore Defence Force colours. On 22.7.70 (purely a ‘paperwork’ date), this aircraft was unusually allocated the UK full civil registration G-AYHS (and Singapore 315 as G-AYHT). Interestingly BAe. used ‘314’ as a constructor’s number (which it isn’t) on the paperwork, not the more correct EEP or PS number. It required a full civilian (or British military) serial to make it legal for the manufacturer to demonstrate it at a public air display.

    Wearing full customer colours, national markings and serial, dual marked with the civil registration, both aircraft appeared at the major S.B.A.C. display at Farnborough, exhibited by British Aerospace, throughout the second week of September 1970. G-AYHT was in the static park, while G-AYHS was flown by BAe. in the air display each day. In theory there should be plenty photos around of G-AYHS/314 – indeed I’m surprised no one has found (other than ‘AMB’) or posted one yet, to add to those great links posted by ‘Hunterxf382’. Any other Singapore Strikemaster and we would be really struggling for a pre-delivery photo, so you are very fortunate!

    Following Farnborough week, the UK civil registration was removed, and despite what it says on the CAA paperwork, I’m unsure that it returned to G-27-143. The aircraft set out on the long delivery flight across Europe and Asia, departing from Bournemouth/Hurn Airport on 28th September 1970 as Singapore 314. Once in Singapore the aircraft acquired the individual aircraft code ‘P’. At some stage while in service the simple national ’roundel’ (as on the Farnborough photos) will have been replaced with the current complex Singapore national insignia.

    There my knowledge of this aircraft ends. However I do have several ’70s and ’80s articles about Strikemaster production in general and the Singapore aircraft which I will copy and e-mail if you let me have an e-mail address privately using the ‘PM’ facility on this forum.

    If British forumites feel I’ve been long winded about this reply I’ve deliberately explained British short-hand, abbreviations and locations at some length!

    OK, probably not 314, but a BAe. publicity photo of a Singapore Strikemaster fresh out of the paint shop, on a pre-delivery flight over the UK with range extending tanks fitted underwing (the tip tanks are standard fit).

    http://i1106.photobucket.com/albums/h365/viscount701/IMG_0010-13.jpg

    in reply to: Manchester – Almeria Aug 2013 #523231
    viscount
    Participant

    Airline, flight number, day of week might all help – question is a little broad at present!

    in reply to: Gallic Marauder 2 #2260962
    viscount
    Participant

    A little explaination of the title would quite likely help some (including myself) appreciate the question – a little cryptic at present!!

    in reply to: Oldest combat aircraft still in service #2261631
    viscount
    Participant

    Diverging slightly from the original request in this thread, in current UK military service, would I be right in thinking that the oldest front line service machines would be with the RAF would be one of few remaining C-130K Hercules (XV177, circa 1967) still in service. With the FAA/Royal Navy the Sea King ASaC7 helicopters (XV649, circa 1969). Note I state ‘front line’ to rule out BBMF or the recently withdrawn ETPS Andover etc.

    Presumably though the oldest aircraft in RAF front-line service will very soon be the Boeing RC-135W’s (1964) once delivered.
    Yes, the oldest airframes, will be the newest aircraft type in RAF service very soon!!! If they had been bought new they would have serials in the mid XS… range – yes, around the TSR-2s, HS Kestral FGA.1, Dominie T.1s and Andover C.1s, along with late production Lightning F.6s and Sea Vixen FAW.2s. What a mixed up world!

    in reply to: The Battle for Malta – Merged thread #967192
    viscount
    Participant

    I gather that ‘Battle for Malta’ will be repeated on UK BBC 2, Sunday 13th January ’13 at 8.00pm.

    Hopefully I will not miss it this time!

    in reply to: Airshow listings 2013. #477297
    viscount
    Participant

    A slightly wider ‘Air Events’ listing:

    http://www.derbosoft.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=shows&action=display&thread=11133

    Some events have still yet to publish dates, I note that the regular annual events at Windermere, Blackpool Seafront and Leuchars are currently absent from listings. Many Club or Airfield fly-ins have yet to publish their dates too.

    Althugh a couple of months before their summer programmes are posted on the web, the ‘Red Arrows’ and ‘Battle of Britain Memorial Flight’ sites have information beyond air show/display performances. Many of the aerobatic teams/solos have their own sites with summer programme, so do Associations such as BGA, British Aerobatics, BBAC, BMAA, UKGA etc – all can be located on a ‘Google’.

    Just keep our fingers crossed that 2013 summer air display and events season features regular fine weather weekends – unlike the dismal year just passed!

    in reply to: RAF Transport Command Memorial – Airworthy Dakota? #975471
    viscount
    Participant

    Pure speculation based on co-incidence, but p.15 of ‘Aviation News’ Jan ’13 edition, and ‘FlyPast’ p.14 Jan ’13 edition, reports that C-47 Skytrain N308SF is bound for the UK, acquired by by Charlie Walker of Wiltshire. Those sources state that it started life as 42-100521, served with 79th TCS, taking part in Operations Market Garden and Dragoon. No RAF service. Back to US as N65384 and N48V, with Northeast amongst others. With French AF 1962-1985, then back to the USA as N308SF. C/no. 18984. Recent restoration work in the USA undertaken by Yesterday’s Wings, Arkansas, is now currently at Punta Gorda, Florida, to fly to the UK this summer.

    in reply to: New Year Photo Quiz #985768
    viscount
    Participant

    Pagen 01 has wrapped it up, although he did not read the question for No.1!

    Being prototypes etc, no.2 is a Stinson (or Convair) XL-13, the answer given being essentially correct.

    No.10 photo is titled as a SE.3200 Frelon – and is F-ZWWF/01.

    No.7 on the aircraft calls itself a XC-142A, so again the answer given was essentially correct.

    Well done all … brain cells tested on an otherwise quiet Bank Holiday.

    in reply to: New Year Photo Quiz #985940
    viscount
    Participant

    Yes, the Do.32 is indeed D-HOPF.

    Pogno – I thought no.8 to be the most obscure of the photos, so well done on a correct identification. There may never have been many six-engined, twin fin flying boats – but the Sud Est SE.200 Amphitrite certainly remains an obscure type despite surviving into the 1960s.

    So thats half way there with 5/10 identified.

    in reply to: New Year Photo Quiz #985987
    viscount
    Participant

    Agree, looks like a Jetstream – but most certainly is not.

    EN830 – a Do.32 it most certainly is – so No.4 is the first answer now known to be identified correctly.

    Kev 35 – all three now correct (although the DHC-7 bit is wrong – DHC-5 Buffalo/C-8A is accepted).

    So that is 1, 4, 5, & 6 out of the way.

    in reply to: New Year Photo Quiz #986020
    viscount
    Participant

    Kev35, well done on an immediate response. Successful in that two are correct, although lack full designations – a further two have the right thinking but wrong names. No bonus mark for the Trident.

    On no.10 I simply removed the paintwork – agree it is somewhat unauthodox without wheels.

    in reply to: Starship over Blackbushe #989565
    viscount
    Participant

    N39TW was registered to Tom Wilkenshaw Feb 1993 to November 1994, which puts an approximate time span for its appearances at Oxford and Blackbushe.

    Always think it was a human, light-hearted touch for a major Corporation to allocate the NC- series of constructor numbers to its Starship!

    Nostalgair2, in post #7, in recent years the design most likely to be seen around the UK is the fairly similarly configured, but not so technically advanced, Piaggio Avanti. I am fairly sure that there has been a Starship in Europe since 2003, but nothing regular.

    in reply to: Starship over Blackbushe #989863
    viscount
    Participant

    To confuse and add. The only Starship ever to land at Liverpool was OY-GEA in 1994. Indeed this appears to have been the only European registered one (1992-1996), although there were certainly US registered ones around at times. However, Tom Wilkinshaw is noted at Liverpool in 1998 in his, not dissimilar looking, Paiggio Avanti N220TW (note the initials in the registration). 25.5.98 Cannes-Liverpool-Oxford.

    Full production list at: http://www.bobscherer.com/Files/Starship/STARSHIP-PRO.pdf

    For those unfamiliar with the Beech Starship then wikipedia is a good a place as any to start learning:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beechcraft_Starship

    Surprised to read that it was as recently as 2003 that the type was re-purchased by Beech and most were destroyed – my memory placed the deed some 5 years earlier!

Viewing 15 posts - 286 through 300 (of 407 total)