dark light

ozplane

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 286 through 300 (of 1,497 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Yeovilton secrets #845340
    ozplane
    Participant

    Thank you TangoMike.

    in reply to: Yeovilton secrets #845382
    ozplane
    Participant

    Yes please. That’s one very sad looking Sea Hawk isn’t it? Was the Supermarine 510 intended to be carrier based?

    in reply to: SPOTTED (2016),What Have You Seen? #845895
    ozplane
    Participant

    Saw a JP heading North over Royston about 1445, same one perhaps? Did a neat roll overhead Little Gransden.

    in reply to: A different view of the WW2 #846962
    ozplane
    Participant

    Thank you for that. It’s a remarkable collection and raises quite a few questions. What’s the story with the all silver RAF B-17 for example? The lion cub on the Me 109 is rather distinctive too.

    ozplane
    Participant

    I’ve just heard from my MP, who after talking to his transport researcher, suggests contacting the CAA direct as the CAA is separate from Government. So on we go.

    in reply to: Avgas prices. Nottingham is like a time warp. #381094
    ozplane
    Participant

    Curses, I was going to go today (which is CAVOK) but I’ve got a head cold starting so no flying for me.

    ozplane
    Participant

    Bruce, I think the CAA are mandated to cover their costs plus a percentage which used to be 7% if I remember correctly.

    ozplane
    Participant

    A well-written report and interesting that a “local” paper would take it up. I bet 70 (?) Chipmunks at Old Warden in May won’t get a mention in the Biggleswade Bugle or whatever the local paper is called.

    in reply to: Shoreham Investigation Update #852505
    ozplane
    Participant

    DaveF68. Thanks for that. It rather confirms my comment about a “pecking order”.

    in reply to: Shoreham Investigation Update #852663
    ozplane
    Participant

    My take on this is that the “authorities” have seen three low level fast jet crashes in the recent past (Bourmemouth, CarFest and Shoreham) and thought this needs an all parties investigation. There will be a “pecking order” as to who does what but an accident record like that can’t go unchallenged.

    in reply to: 15 'New' Hinds!! (2008 Zombie thread) #853202
    ozplane
    Participant

    You have the AUDAXity to tell me to grow up?

    in reply to: No Shoreham Airshow 2016 #861559
    ozplane
    Participant

    I think that is the correct decision. However I would imagine all airshow organisers must be on tenterhooks waiting for the AAIB/CAA reports before they can go ahead with their plans for 2016.

    in reply to: TV channels give zero progs on historic aviation now #862763
    ozplane
    Participant

    Without flogging this to death, I wonder where the 1.2 million attendance for the 2014 Bournemouth show came from. as the combined population of Bournemouth and Poole is 340,000. So assuming everybody attended (unlikely) you’d still need another 860,000 to wedge themselves on to the promenade. Even if the figure is correct it still doesn’t take the numbers anywhere near football attendances.

    ozplane
    Participant

    That’s amazing, thanks for posting. The stall after the loop is stomach churning.

    in reply to: TV channels give zero progs on historic aviation now #863655
    ozplane
    Participant

    Just catching up and I thought I would look at some numbers to prove/disprove that airshows attract more paying spectators than football. Well, according to my Sunday paper 651,681 spectators attended Saturday’ s matches in the four top divisions. Add on another 50K for the Conference and non-league games and a total of 700,000 could be about right. As for airshows, Duxford pulls in about 15,000 per day so 60,000. RIAT maybe 100,000 and 3 seaside shows perhaps 100,000 each (though how many pay is another question). If the airshow season is 30 weeks long and 10,000 at a show somewhere every weekend that all rolls up to a total of about 760.000. So the football crowd per weekend is roughly equal to a whole season’s airshow attendance and bear in mind the football season is 40 weeks long. I read somewhere that the original quote about airshow attendances being second only to football was dreamed up by an American promoter who was desperate to get the crowds in to his show. If anybody can be bothered to dig out the figures I could imagine that cricket, horse racing, motor racing and both codes of rugby would give airshows a run for their money.

Viewing 15 posts - 286 through 300 (of 1,497 total)