Civil aero, I see you would have liked a “nice” DH71 Tiger Moth. I believe a chap in the USA built a replica and “nice” wasn’t a word he used about it’s handling. Apparently it was a real handful and most unstable. Feather #3 might be along to give more detail as I believe he saw it and spoke to the builder.
Hi Schwartz Wald The “proboard” reference was the third one in your initial post.
New Forest, if you look on the proboard, it’s back in Opa Locka so perhaps all is not lost.
Nice shots chaps. Is there any news on the DH 9 that was being rebuilt to fly?
I’ve just had a look in the album and there isn’t a name. There used to be a letter with it but I assume my aunt kept that as a souvenir and I’m afraid she is no longer with us.
I’m a bit late to this thread but perhaps I could add a little anecdote which might be of interest. My aunt was a nurse at Lytham Hospital during the war and was out for a walk on the promenade when a German aircraft was shot down. Apparently when a crew member, who had swum ashore, was trying to get out of the water the Home Guard kept shoving him back in. This didn’t appeal to my aunt, who was quite a formidable lady, and she eventually persuaded them to desist and she got him off to hospital. Thinking that was the last she’d hear of him, she was most surprised to receive, after the war, a very nice stamp collection with thanks for saving his life. It’s on my shelf as I write.
I would debate the American idea of contemporary. Surely 1970 isn’t contemporary as they would suggest in their definition. I think the UK VAC definition works well and a 50 year old Cherokee is vintage in aircraft terms. Cortinas and Model Ts are irrelevant as there are different definitions in the car world. What aircraft do you own by the way?
The UK VAC count anything over 40 years as “Vintage” and over 25 as “Classic”.
Sensible if you think about it as the airframes are all getting older so doing it on a rolling basis makes sense. Put an early Cherokee like the one in the picture against a Cirrus SR22 and you’ll see what they mean.
Great shots as always Pen Pusher. Just a quick question, has the Yale flown much in the last 4 or 5 years?
Which is why the Breitling Fighters were such a great “act”. Four dissimilar aircraft with different aerodynamics. I remember Lee telling me that the Mustang used to accelerate in a dive much quicker than the others, which made matching speeds tricky. The Corsair on the other hand had so much power it was easy to balance the speeds required plus it’s aerodynamics let it slow down quickly when required. I think what might be an upcoming problem is the lack of practice time available due to the increasing costs of operating a warbird. We shall see.
I think the use of composite technology was not well understood amongst the potential purchasers and indeed I understand the airframe came out a lot heavier than expected. Couple this with the prop noise and control problems then I stand by my suggestion that the technology was too advanced when you could buy a King Air (and still can) to do the same job.
Halcyonman, if it was Tom Walkinshaw’s aircraft you saw, it was c/n NC-23 and registered N39TW, formerly N8244S. I hope that helps.
It might not be strictly true but it is certain that they don’t fly with Beech back-up and probably operate on an American “Experimental” certificate. It just reinforces the difficulty of launching a new technology product in to what is a fairly conservative arena, especially when you have a winner like the King Air series.
I think the late Tom Walkinshaw had one in connection with his motor racing team. I saw it a couple of times at Oxford and it was an “N” reg but I didn’t get the number. All the remaining Starships were bought back by Beech and scrapped to avoid warranty issues, possibly helping to contribute to their recent bankruptcy issues.
Thanks Colin. Amazing that it was 32 years ago. Time certainly does fly.