dark light

ozplane

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 901 through 915 (of 1,497 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Whazzat? #1134271
    ozplane
    Participant

    “Spins” or “passes” ? Didn’t think spinning was practised much in the early swept wing jets.
    I’ll get my coat.

    in reply to: Sigma 70-300 failure (Sony Alpha fit) #445621
    ozplane
    Participant

    Joining in this a bit late but I have a Sigma 70-300 APO DG Macro which I use with a Nikon D40. I had a good summer with it in 2009 and was doing quite well this year until the Little Gransden show when the whole shebang locked up and it wouldn’t release the shutter, focus or anything else. I took it back to the dealer in Cambridge who returned it to Sigma and it’s back now , repaired at their cost as it was under guarantee. There was no explanation with it but it does seem to be working quite well but for how long? No airshows to check it at this time of year.

    in reply to: Japanese Newsreel Footage B29s and others #1145688
    ozplane
    Participant

    Very sad and moving film. Particularly the B-29 that was dropping out of the formation at 6:49. I wonder what he was thinking seeing his chums disappearing ahead of him. Not being a military enthusiast I was surprised to see so many wrecked B-29s. After their Hiroshima/Nagasaki exploits I had thought they were almost impregnable. Clearly not.

    in reply to: SPTA October round up #531451
    ozplane
    Participant

    Thanks Scott. Sounds reasonable to me.

    in reply to: SPTA October round up #531461
    ozplane
    Participant

    Greta shots but what is the point of camouflaging the big Bell (?) machine and then painting the engine compartment in a hi-viz paint? I don’t really “do” military stuff so I’m just curious.

    in reply to: ATC Squadron instructional airframes #1097187
    ozplane
    Participant

    You are quite correct AA, the Airtourer I referred to was G-AWVH. A bit of further research shows it crashed at Goodwood on 15/3/81, was cancelled 12/83 and the remains went to an ATC Squadron at Laindon. It was finally scrapped in 91. Not as glamorous as the Spitfires but could be added to your list for completeness.

    in reply to: ATC Squadron instructional airframes #1097981
    ozplane
    Participant

    Avion ancien, I note your interest in civilian aircraft that ended up with ATC Squadrons and i have an oddity for you. I own Airtourer G-AWVG and I have a note that Airtourer G-AWVF was handed on to an ATC squadron in Essex (?) after it was withdrawn from service. Have you got any info on that ?

    in reply to: HS-125 . . . G-AVAI #1104952
    ozplane
    Participant

    Saw a rather dead looking 125 as I flew over Cranfield yesterday. Is that up for grabs?

    in reply to: Miles Whitney Straight #1104962
    ozplane
    Participant

    Jungmeister has the “round” engine and the Jungmann has the “straight” one (of various types). I believe you can still buy a new build Jungmann from Poland (?)

    in reply to: Enstone Bits And Pieces #1105927
    ozplane
    Participant

    Missed the Messenger as well but one hangar was locked. Which one is it?

    in reply to: Enstone Bits And Pieces #1105929
    ozplane
    Participant

    Thanks Thunderbird. It looked as though some rubbing down has been undertaken on the Meteor so hopefully it’s due for a repaint. I didn’t see any signs of anything other than the wings and engines/props of the Bristol Frightener.

    in reply to: Top Gun II headed your way soon ! #1107888
    ozplane
    Participant

    Only this forum could condemn this proposal before a frame has been shot.

    in reply to: Uknown Type Coded LV-105 #1107897
    ozplane
    Participant

    Looks like a version of the Pou-de-ciel or “Flying Flea”. Avions ancien will be along shortly with the pilots inside trouser leg length I have no doubt as he’s keen on these oddballs.

    in reply to: Westland Wyvern #1107900
    ozplane
    Participant

    Thanks chaps for the updates on the reason for the double fold wings. I was showing an American chum the Gannet at Duxford and he fell about laughing at the wingfold set-up and the Mamba engine installation. An excess of complication was his viewpoint.

    in reply to: Westland Wyvern #1108317
    ozplane
    Participant

    Slight thread drift but I’ve always wondered why several British naval aircraft, including the Wyvern, had a second fold on each wing. Was this for clearance on the hangar deck? Otherwise it seems to add extra complication and therefore weight, which is not a “good thing”.

Viewing 15 posts - 901 through 915 (of 1,497 total)