There is one element that I don’t know how it’s been addressed in display flying. The P-63 at Biggin Hill was felt by the ground observers to be performing outside it’s safety zone so they decided to stop it’s display. However they couldn’t contact the Tower and the aircraft crashed before the aircraft was contacted. I believe something similar happened last year at Legends (?) when the French Corsair overflew the crowd but in that case he was contcted so perhaps I’ve answered my own question. What are the rules in the case of perceived unsafe flying?
So I was right. Miracles never cease.
Or Duxford
Just had a look at my car books and I think the MG is a rare VA Tickford model based on the engine size you quote. Not one of MG’s more successful designs but very pretty nonetheless. It sold for £325 in 1938 and might be worth £16-£20K now. The Tiger Moth sold for £800 and is worth around £40K now. You pays your money and takes your pick I guess.
Thanks, as a pilot I’ve never seen the point of leaving an aircraft that’s still working. Dropping in this cold weather conrfirms that they are actually bonkers.
A nice comparison of two contemporary “vehicles”. Was the MG an SA model?
Great shots. Surely they weren’t paradropping in that weather were they?
No problem David. I just hope de Havilland Support are still around to help with approval when the Hornet is ready to fly!!
David, read my note #7 in this thread and that gives you the process. It’s always easier and cheaper if somebody has done it before you and I guess the Buchons are covered by the work done for the B of B movie if not by the re-imports in later years.
I think you need to be aware of the use of the word “certified” in this arena. This involves design approval by the CAA and would be horrendously expensive. To get the minor mod to improve the fuel flow system on my single-engined a/c would cost 10 hrs at £122 per hour, so you can imagine what a re-engine job would cost to certify. However you might get a Permit to Fly based on the work done by the Americans for an American engine but it would still be chargeble by the CAA and of course you would have to buy the mod from the American source. It’s just a shame that the Centaurus is such a blighter to maintain. How did the National Servicemen do it in Korea I wonder?
Thanks for your vote of confidence in my ability to get the Airtourer down to Oz, JDK, but I fear it would be a long haul, despite the guaranteed hospitality once we got there. Re your query on how many fly in UK, well it’s 12 out of the 30 odd that were imported. I always get asked when I arrive at a Fly-In if I built it myself, which I’m not sure I take as a compliment.
On the subject of Ozzie designs wasn’t there a crop-sprayer with twin booms (to allow tankers to drive up to the hopper) called the Agtruck? Odd looking thing that didn’t sell too well although one made it to Kenya in the 70s when I was working out there.
JDK, I take your point on British (over)-engineering but you lot are no better. I own a Victa Airtourer and my engineer runs for cover when I turn up for an annual service. We had to do some work on the flaperons this year and it drove us mad trying to get the alignment right after re-assembly. However I suppose you can (like the Chipmunk) blame the Poles as the Airtourer was designed by Henry Millicer. By the way they hope to get 50 Airtourers together at Wangaratta for the 50 th Anniversary in March thsi year.
You are seriously joking if you think any of the Beagle types would make it in today’s climate. The reason the Pup failed was that it cost £8,000 to build and they were selling it at £5,500. The market at the time wouldn’t have stood the difference. In addition it was hopelessly complex. The double curvature on the fuselage was expensive to form , the doors fell off and the u/c was a thing of wonder, not to mention the corrosion problems. It was nice to fly though.
I don’t know where it is in France but perhaps an E-Mail to the vendors in post #1 might elicit some information?
If you open the pdf, it confirms it’s in France.