dark light

jerryw

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Surviving Sunbeam aero-engines #816430
    jerryw
    Participant

    Here is a pic of the data plate from the Dyak engine at Mascot, Sydney, AU

    in reply to: Surviving Sunbeam Aero-Engines. #1042219
    jerryw
    Participant

    Thanks for the info, fellas but you are way behind the times!

    The Sunbeam Vintage Race Car with Maori 2 engine was purchased by John Fitzpatrick of Melbourne last year.

    Photo is of me with the car at Lancefield where the vehicle was being fitted with a set of mudguards.

    This info is on the Table!!

    Cheers, Jerry.

    in reply to: Surviving Sunbeam Aero-Engines. #1044151
    jerryw
    Participant

    Extant Sunbeam Aero-Engines

    Below is my latest update of the list; the Arab has been moved to GB and the serial number of the Dyak at Mascot, Sydney, AU has been read.

    in reply to: DB 600 compression ratios #1184585
    jerryw
    Participant

    DB Compression ratios.

    It is often asked, “why wasn’t this uneven oil consumption a problem with the DB 601 (or DB 600, for that matter)”.
    The answer is, it probably was but it needs to be remembered that the DB 600 series engines were designed and put into production very quickly and so, it is quite possible that the problem took some while to filter back to the manufacturer. It may well have been a fact that overhauled DB 601 engines were fitted with low compression pistons in the left-hand bank.
    The original hand books and data sheets would, of course, only mention the single compression ratio figure.
    It would be an interesting exercise for the Bf 109 experts to check if photos of Bf 109’s in service had dirtier, sooty exhaust stains on the left side of the cowling as compared to the RHS.

    in reply to: DB605A compression ratios #1185670
    jerryw
    Participant

    DB CR’s

    There is a direct reference to this matter in a report that was written by Rolls-Royce engineers following a visit to Germany shortly after the end of the War.
    The DB engineers they spoke to made two points, 1/ that they were required to build their V-12 engines inverted even though it was against their better judgement and
    2/ the use of the differential CR’s in the DB 600 engines was to combat the effects of uneven oil consumption in the two banks of cylinders.
    The different CR’s had NOTHING to do with off-set superchargers or articulated con-rods (which these engines never had).
    Read the posts by TempestNut – he knows what he is talking about!!

    in reply to: DB 600 compression ratios #1185678
    jerryw
    Participant

    DB CR’s

    Some books list the figures as, for example, 7.5/7.3 while others give the figures the other way round!
    The left hand bank would have the lower CR.
    This was a problem of oil consumption, or more precisely, a problem due to UNEVEN oil consumption according to the conversations the Rolls-Royce engineers had with the D.B. people very shortly after the War’s end.
    If anyone has a REFERENCE to dispute this, please post it.

    in reply to: How ws the Merlin 32 optimised for low altitude? #1186599
    jerryw
    Participant

    RM numbers

    I think I understand. The Merlin 30 and 32 had reduced size impellers, presumably for better performance at lower altitude, but they are not called cropped because the engine was designed to have them. The Merlin 45M has a reduced size impeller which is called cropped because it is a modification to the Merlin 45.

    In M&S there is a table of engine variants. One of the columns is headed MoS Experimental Nomenclature. Can you explain to me what is in this column. MoS = Ministry of Supply? The entries all begin RM for Merlins and RG for Griffons – Rolls Royce Merlin and Rolls Royce Griffon? What do the numbers that follow refer to? The size of the supercharger? Somebody told me that the cropped series 45 and 50 Merlins (M suffix) were not given RM values because they were modified engines but M&S list values for all the variants except the Merlin 66-68. Is this another mistake by M&S.
    Many thanks.

    The numbers after RM or RG refer to the RATINGS for the particular type of engine, eg ‘3’ means the third attempt to provide a particular performance standard for that engine.

    in reply to: How ws the Merlin 32 optimised for low altitude? #1186604
    jerryw
    Participant

    Merlin 45

    [
    The low-altitude performance compared to the Merlin 45 was acheived by having a gear ratio of 8.588:1 instead of 9.09:1
    The rated altitudfe for the Merlin 32 is 2500ft.

    Pete[/QUOTE]
    The Rolls-Royce engine data sheets disagree with the above info. They all show the Merlin 45 and the Merlin 45M to have a supercharger gear ratio of 9.09.

    in reply to: DB 600 compression ratios #1186620
    jerryw
    Participant

    DB 600 series differential compression ratios.

    Attached is a copy of page 4 of a 6 page article I did on this topic some time ago.
    This particular page quotes the only concrete reference I’ve ever come across pertaining to the matter.
    The different CR’s were introduced because of an OIL CONSUMPTION problem, not off-set supercharger or articulated con-rods (which the DB 600 series engines never had).

    in reply to: Surviving Sunbeam Aero-Engines. #1236795
    jerryw
    Participant

    Sunbeam Arab.

    Sunbeam Arab out of a Bristol Fighter? belonged to the RSAC collection in Oshawa for 30 years plus, recently sold off, dont know who to.

    The engine pictured here is now located in the RAF Museum at Hendon. It is believed to be the only surviving Arab.

    Jerryw.

    in reply to: Surviving Sunbeam Aero-Engines. #1162768
    jerryw
    Participant

    Thanks, Mark. I have checked the situation re the Longreach museum. Two Avro 504 replicas were built by the Qantas apprentices in the 1970’s. The one at Mascot Airport is believed to have a genuine Dyak engine installed but the one at Longreach has only a Beardmore crankcase in it to provide an attachment for the propeller.

    Jerry.

    in reply to: Surviving Sunbeam Aero-Engines. #1163418
    jerryw
    Participant

    Surviving Sunbeam Aero-Engines

    Thanks fellas! Some really interesting possibilities mentioned so far. Delighted to learn that at least one of the infamous “Arab” engines has survived.

    Jerryw.

    in reply to: Prototype Spifire K5054. #1167642
    jerryw
    Participant

    According to Spitfire History and Jeffrey Quill this photo was one of a series taken June 18, 1936 at Eastleigh, after the engine had seized during a press view.

    Best Wishes.
    Robert.

    Not possible, Robert. At the Press Day K5054 had flush exhausts. The aircraft in this photo has the anti-glare manifolds which were fitted some months later.

Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)