dark light

philglt

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 62 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The Day-Glo thread…. #1306866
    philglt
    Participant

    Excellent Albert–thanks for those. 🙂
    Phil

    in reply to: The Day-Glo thread…. #1306937
    philglt
    Participant

    Very good “Albert”, but do you have any photos of the Queen’s Flight Herons which I remember seeing in an all-over and very striking (Dayglo?) red scheme many moons ago? (Itwould also make an interesting Corgi scheme 😀 )
    Phil

    in reply to: Any physicists on here? #1931919
    philglt
    Participant

    A few things about your method are not ideal. It is probably too late to change this now, but at least you can make amends in your evaluation.I’m not sure why you are using a wheeled truck and an air track. You usually use a “v-shaped” unwheeled metal “vehicle” which is then pretty frictionless. Or use a wheeled truck on a long(wooden or metal) runway which you friction-compensate by tilting the runway until the vehicle when given a gentle momentary push then moves down the runway at a steady speed(Newton’s first law).
    The way you are measuring the KE gain and GPE lost is not ideal as you are only measuring the average KE gain for a given GPE lost. This should give you a lower figure for the KE rather than the higher one quoted.
    It may have been better to have measured the GPE lost from the fallen height to striking the floor(75cm say) and then to have measured the speed gained over a distance of 10-20 cm electronically AFTER the falling mass has hit the floor.( electronic timing should mean that you can measure over a shorter distance and still retain accuracy) The truck is then moving at a steady speed(no forces on it) and will be the final KE reached.
    Your KE gained should ALWAYS be less than the GPE lost in such experiments due to energy losses — air resistance with moving objects, friction in the pulley and possibly some friction due to poor friction-compensation being the most obviouse areas.
    I hope this long answer is of some use to you.

    Phil

    in reply to: General Discussion #321981
    philglt
    Participant

    A few things about your method are not ideal. It is probably too late to change this now, but at least you can make amends in your evaluation.I’m not sure why you are using a wheeled truck and an air track. You usually use a “v-shaped” unwheeled metal “vehicle” which is then pretty frictionless. Or use a wheeled truck on a long(wooden or metal) runway which you friction-compensate by tilting the runway until the vehicle when given a gentle momentary push then moves down the runway at a steady speed(Newton’s first law).
    The way you are measuring the KE gain and GPE lost is not ideal as you are only measuring the average KE gain for a given GPE lost. This should give you a lower figure for the KE rather than the higher one quoted.
    It may have been better to have measured the GPE lost from the fallen height to striking the floor(75cm say) and then to have measured the speed gained over a distance of 10-20 cm electronically AFTER the falling mass has hit the floor.( electronic timing should mean that you can measure over a shorter distance and still retain accuracy) The truck is then moving at a steady speed(no forces on it) and will be the final KE reached.
    Your KE gained should ALWAYS be less than the GPE lost in such experiments due to energy losses — air resistance with moving objects, friction in the pulley and possibly some friction due to poor friction-compensation being the most obviouse areas.
    I hope this long answer is of some use to you.

    Phil

    in reply to: I was a teenage plane spotter (episode 2) #1346408
    philglt
    Participant

    Hi William, I don’t have the exact date on the slide, but you are correct about ’69. On those long days spotting at Speke, the old Fox Moth was often the only thing to move all day bouncing across the grass
    If you have more photos of Speke in those days I would love to see them.

    Phil

    in reply to: I was a teenage plane spotter (episode 2) #1346483
    philglt
    Participant

    Wow! Was this taken on the same day?? 😮

    in reply to: Early days in Liverpool #1346935
    philglt
    Participant

    I was also a member of the MGAE/MSAE for a while in the early 60’s.It’s great to see pictures from this period. I hope this isn’t the start of a scouse clique :p
    Phil

    in reply to: Legends 2005 DVD out now… #1362002
    philglt
    Participant

    I just got my copy of Legends 2005 today. For those interested in a low price it was £9.99 (including P+P) from http://www.bensonsworld.co.uk and took about 10 days from order online. 🙂
    Phil

    in reply to: Top Secret Project at Cambridge #1396837
    philglt
    Participant

    It was my first time there Adrian. We were down that way for a family wedding, so a good chance to see aeroplanes. 😀
    It’s a great place for a day out with its fantastic large(free!!) viewing area and lots going on all day. You can also get some great shots(Minolta Z2)
    Phil

    in reply to: Top Secret Project at Cambridge #1396893
    philglt
    Participant

    I think that you will find that others have been working on similar projects.This was taken at Headcorn earlier this year. :p
    Phil

    in reply to: Unfortunate mishap for Classic Wings #1398623
    philglt
    Participant

    Here are e few more taken just after the fire was extinguished. In the “old days” I remember engines being started with portable extinguishers on a trolley nearby. The fire engines had to move through the many people still at the show to reach the fire.
    Phil

    philglt
    Participant

    I thought you would like them.My first real outing with the 300D. It’s a pity so little was flying to practice on.One last one for you. 😉
    Phil

    philglt
    Participant

    Here are a few late pictures from Tuesday’s photoshoot and fast taxi.It was also nice to put a couple of faces to names(Darren and Damien).
    Phil

    in reply to: General Discussion #386849
    philglt
    Participant

    A couple taken at Interlarken last year.

    Phil 🙂

    in reply to: Sunset Photos (08/04/05) #1949973
    philglt
    Participant

    A couple taken at Interlarken last year.

    Phil 🙂

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 62 total)