dark light

Peter G

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 803 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Impressive Weapons Load 2 (again) #2156845
    Peter G
    Participant

    First test flight was 3rd June back in UK. It was then parachuted to the task group. The first round as being assembled the day of the surrender.

    in reply to: F-16 questions #2187978
    Peter G
    Participant

    AFAIK baseline APG-66.

    in reply to: Algerian Air Force-pictures and discussion #2188063
    Peter G
    Participant

    MiG-29S with R-27T: https://youtu.be/RZtBFnEk4Iw?t=174

    First time I’ve seen these fitted to any MiG-29 version.

    in reply to: Algerian Air Force-pictures and discussion #2188092
    Peter G
    Participant

    Were the MiG-29S ever fitted with R-77 missiles?

    This one shows bombs, B-8 rocket pods and AAM, although its unclear which ones: https://youtu.be/NQMxj7Ijgng?t=319

    Peter G
    Participant

    When I was in Darwin rumours were that they were losing some of them due to old age – cockpit instruments were failing, leading to fuel starvation. This was just before they were retired.

    Peter G
    Participant

    RAAF went with The Mirage III to replace its Sabre fighters.

    They also looked at F-5, F-104, F-105 and Lightning.

    Lightning was too specialised, high tire pressure and range was too short.
    F-105 was rejected as too expensive, complex and inadequate performance (probably in fighter role)
    F-5 rejected as performance was inadequate.

    So down to F-104 and Mirage III

    Went with Mirage III due ti:
    Runway performance – 135 vs 285 psi
    Lower chance of FOD
    Less chance of stalling
    No gun issues
    Ferry range was 1670 nm vs 1517 nm
    Higher cruise speed
    Higher loiter altitude
    Cheaper
    Better landing characteristics

    They had to go with two variants
    Mirage IIIO(F) which lacks air to ground weapons. Flown by No 75 and No 76 Squadrons
    Mirage IIIO(A) with added fuel, doppler navigation. Flown by No 3 and No 77 Squadrons.
    Also eight III(A) were fitted with option of swapping radar for low altitude cameras.

    Initial weapons were AIM-9B (1965-84) then Magic 1 (1984-88), and R530 AAM (1965-85)
    Attack weapons were UK 500 and 1000 lb bombs (1960s), Mk82 bombs (around 1970), Mk82SE (1975?), MK84 (1970s) and GBU-12 Paveway II (1980).

    III(F) were converted to III(O) by 1970.
    When No 76 squadron disbanded in 1973, all squadrons went to multirole. However flight hours remained the same and the avionics limited pilot experience. For example teh attack units were no longer proficient in low altitude attacks in poor weather or by night.
    Hours dropped in 1975. Squadrons were highly skilled in dogfighting, medium in intercepts and low as all weather
    By 1983 70% of role was fighter, 30% attack.
    They were directly replaced by the F-18A Hornet from 1985.

    There was a proposal to purchase the 24 leased F-4E (served 1970-73) and purchase a further 40 F-4E, 8 RF-4E and 8 KC-135 but this too expensive. This would have partially replaced the Mirage III and delayed the replacement MRF (F-18A Hornet).

    In any case the F-111C entered service in 1973, which largely released the Mirage IIIO from the attack role.

    in reply to: Ja 37 viggen ( interceptor version) vs Mig-23MLA #2137268
    Peter G
    Participant

    Yes, no HMS added.

    in reply to: Ja 37 viggen ( interceptor version) vs Mig-23MLA #2138012
    Peter G
    Participant
    in reply to: Ja 37 viggen ( interceptor version) vs Mig-23MLA #2138045
    Peter G
    Participant

    J 35D Draken had STRIL 60 GCI datalink – this was a second set of markers on the compass, altimeter, speed, etc to give intercept parameters to the target. This was back in 1963.

    JA 37 Viggen (1980) always had GCI datalink, then:
    1985: Mod A – Adds fighter to fighter datalink (two a/c can transmit at once). Datalink to around 81 nm.
    1987: Mod B – adds BOY401 flare decoys, Rb74 (AIM-9L) vice Rb24J (AIM-9J), datalink updated to have 4 a/c transmitting at once
    1990: JA 37C upgrade with improved radar ECCM, TWS added
    1992: Automatic gun aiming added (radar coupled with autopilot and gun)
    1995: Fitted with BOL 300 chaff decoys
    1996: Surface search mode added to radar.
    1997-01: 35 upgraded to JA 37D with U95 jammer, improved RWR and tactical display (datalink, map), AMRAAM capability.
    1999: Passive mode added to radar.
    2003-04: Retired
    2012: Proposed upgrade with IRIS-T.
    2020: Could have remained in service till this date with Meteor and IRST.

    Random notes:
    Canards don’t really help agility as the aircraft is dynamically stable. It bleeds off speed in turning fight.
    Excellent initial turn rate, very poor sustained. Speed drops from Mach 0.9 to 300 kph in 180 degree turn
    Large RCS (those intakes!) and visual signature, low IR signature due to thrust reverser
    Swedish pilots used aircraft mainly as BVR

    in reply to: Egyptian and Turkish F16 and AIM7 sparrow #2140948
    Peter G
    Participant

    SPIRI has 282 AIM-7M delivered for F-16C 1991-92, so possibly with first Block 40s?

    in reply to: Egyptian and Turkish F16 and AIM7 sparrow #2141973
    Peter G
    Participant
    in reply to: Pakistan Air Force #2195281
    Peter G
    Participant

    PAF flew with AIM-9B Sidewinders in 1971. Any photos of these fitted? I guessing they used inner hard points with Winders and outer hard points with drop tanks?

    From 1981 new outer wing HP (six total) were added. Does this mean they could carry four Sidewinders? Again any photos?

    Outer wing HP: http://www.pafwallpapers.com/aircraft_gallery/F-6_gallery/No19-Sqn_F-6.jpg

    in reply to: Pakistan Air Force #2195284
    Peter G
    Participant

    Number 1 squadron flew the FT-5 (Chinese JJ-5 trainer) between 1975 and 2012 as a trainer. In 1987 they were assigned a wartime role with AIM-9 Sidewinders.

    Anyone have photos of PAF FT-5 armed with Sidewinders?

    I believe they used 400 L drop tanks? What is their internal fuel load?

    Peter G
    Participant

    If they go ahead with the purchase of the 12 EA-18G and 12 F/A-18F, none of the first batch will be modified to EA-18G.

    So the final numbers would be 12 EA-18G and 36 F/A-18F. They would probably keep the training role rather than send it back to the USN.

    So No 6 would operate the 12 EA-18G and possibly a couple of F/A-18F. No 1 would remain as strike. Then probably another squadron for training (possibly No 75 as they were last planned with F-35A?).

    Then No 3, No 2 OCU and No 77 with F-35A.

    in reply to: Harpoon: which version does the Royal Navy use? #1791445
    Peter G
    Participant

    Last report I had was they did some Block IC conversion kits to update existing Harpoon in country

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 803 total)