Possibly due to the additional fuel?
Or you could wait until they at least prove the initial testing 😉
Which game is it for?
Recce Lite has the datalink antenna on the bottom
Recce Lite: http://www.rafael.co.il/Marketing/334-915-en/Marketing.aspx
Litening: http://www.rafael.co.il/Marketing/334-914-en/Marketing.aspx
^^How much is the warhead?
90 kg
I thought MAR-1 had a range of 60 km? Again I have no source on this…..
GCS-1 – Mk82 with IR seeker for use against landing craft.
What about whacking North Korean missile sites?
F-2A carries the GCS-1 IR guided bomb – which is also probably useable against ground targets.
Recently (2009?) the F-2A started using the J/AAQ-2 targeting pod and has also carried the GBU-38 JDAM (2009?). The laser-guided JDAM is also planned to enter service.
J/AAQ-2 looks like nav FLIR on the hardpoint with the standard gimballed targeting FLIR and laser designator:
http://www.geocities.jp/eaglet_f15/MILITARY/F-2.htm
The translation is a little unclear, but it appears the plan is for APG-2 to replace APG-1 with increased range and provision for AAM-4.
Flightglobal link on Libyan Predator operations
http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2011/04/22/355895/us-arms-uavs-for-libya-missions.html
More on support costs
A key target is reducing the $442 billion estimate at Fiscal 2002 inflation values for F-35 operations and sustainment costs. That cost projection was produced in late 2009 by Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR), which was then led by Venlet.
The NAVAIR study estimates that the F-35 will cost $30,700 per hour to fly, a 40% increase compared to $18,900 per hour for the F/A-18A-D and AV-8B
…..
“We see that [cost] estimate,” Venlet says. “We know that’ s not the right number. We don’t know what the right number is.”
Seems a developed Dual Mode Brimstone is planned as part of the SPEAR program from 2012 with the Tornado GR4:
http://www.mbda-systems.com/mbda/site/ref/scripts/EN_DUAL-MODE-BRIMSTONE_416.html
http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2010/07/01/343909/bae-to-test-mbdas-new-brimstone-variant-with-tornado.html
Thanks PeterG. Just a little question , is that just FOUR Mig-23 kills claimed by the F-16s or is it a typing error ?
It’s interesting that according to this latest info F-15 claimed 34 kills and F-16 claimed 31, which makes 65 total. I’m not sure if the F-4 claim ( 1) still stands.Thanks again.
The F-4E claim was a MiG-21.
Double checking the Israeli F-16A claims are actually 43 – The numbers I have only account for 42: 18 MiG-21, 15 MiG-23, 7 Su-22, 2 Gazelle.
There were probably some kills by ground air defences – some sources quote 12 Gazelle (On the Edge, Bill Norton).
Roughly half of the MiG-23 were actually MiG-23BN. Most of the MiG-21 were MiG-21MF with some MIG-21bis.
There were some kills in 1981, and some after June 1982 in Lebanon.
One F-15A was hit, possibly by a MiG-21bis/R-60. The aircraft was damaged and returned to base.
F-15 claims are 17 MiG-21, 16 MiG-23, 1 Gazelle
F-16 claims 18 MiG-21, 4 MiG-23, 7 Su-22, 2 Gazelle
Sourced from:
http://www.isradecal.com/?storeid=110&view=products&id=3952
and the similar F-16A book
Australian Army, not RAAF.
Pilot familiarization – these are the divert airfields, ATCs, NATO AWACS, ships you will be talking with etc. They may of also taken on fuel from tankers (cleared for at least C-135FR, KC-135 and KC-10). As per the link below operational missions from Friday or Saturday.
Some Swedish Gripen have Link 16, specifically for international operations. Surely they would be ensuring that would be working before operational patrols.
Swedish Gripens are cleared for AIM-9L, AIM-120B, GBU-12, Litening III target pod, SPK-39 recon pod (lacks datalink).
Can anyone confirm they are operational with GBU-49 and IRIS-T?
Any reason why not?