Yefim Gordon’s Aerofax book has:
Su-24M
MTOW – 39700 kg
Empty – 22300 kg
Payload: 8000 kg
Leaves 9400 kg for fuel
Fuel is carried in three internal tanks
No. 1: 3220 L (some early series SU-24 had 2220 L)
No. 2: 2950 L
No. 3: 4890 L
Total: 11060 L x 0.785 = 8682 kg
Looks about right.
In 1975 they locked the inlets on the earlier Su-24 – this saved maintenance and 236 kg weight. Maximum speed was limited as a result.
Note the Sukhoi link: http://www.sukhoi.org/eng/planes/military/su24mk/lth/ says 11060 kg, but it also has:
11,200 kg engine thrust in full power (actually 7800 kg per engine)
111,200 kg afterburner thrust! (actually 11,200 kg per engine)
Red Eagles book
352 flippin’ pages!: http://www.ospreypublishing.com/title_detail.php/title=T3780
MiG-21F was not fitted with radar
MIG-21F13 has SRD-5M range only set. Licence produced by PRC.
MiG-21P [Fishbed D] adds Lazur GCI datalink
MiG-21PF [Fishbed D]. Exported to North Vietnam as MiG-21PFV.
MiG-21PFS [Fishbed D]: One regiment. As you say with blown flaps and provision for RATO.
MiG-21PFM [Fishbed E] also has Sirena-3M RWR. Interim before:
MiG-21PFM [Fishbed F[ with new ejection seat. Widely exported.
Also
MiG-21MT [K] which is the SMT without the extra fuel. Only 15 produced.
MiG-21ST were converted from SMT in early 1970s with extra fuel removed.
MiG-21bis [Fishbed L] gas Lazur GCI datalink.
Mig-21bis [Fishbed N] has RSBN TACAN/ILS, Some were wired for nukes as MiG-21bisN
Nukes seemed to standard from at least the MiG-21SM.
AFAIK they looked it over and then scrapped it.
It was in very poor condition after retiring.
It had an point defence role that was cleared for use with the weapons displayed.
What about upgrading to the Multi-Mission Combatant Standard (proposed export version):
SPY-1F radar
8 VLS w/32 ESSM
8 Harpoon
2 Phalanx
6 torpedo tubes
towed array sonar
http://www.gdlcs.com/documents/MMC-Brochure.pdf
http://www.gdlcs.com/documents/MMC-DataSheet.pdf
http://www.gdlcs.com/documents/MMC-PostCard.pdf
Can the F-35A take off with a useful load and that full amount of fuel, or does it have to refuel after takeoff to do so?
2004 figures –
Quoted MTOW = 27216 kg
Empty = 12020 kg (also as 13170 kg)
Internal Fuel = 8165 kg
Payload/[pilot/consumables, etc = 7031 kg (also given as 7250 kg)
The max hardpoint load is 9843 kg in any case.
Future Wasp air group is supposed to be:
12 MV-22
4 CH-53E
4 AH-1Z
3 UH-1Y
2 MH-60S
6 F-35B
LHA(R) is:
12 MV-22
4 CH-53E/K
4 AH-1Z
4 UH-1Y
4 MH-60S
10 F-35B
In pure attack role this could be 20 F-35B and 4 MH-60S
EFV is a bit of trouble -AFAIK they’ve basically started again.
From that same link: “Another MV-22 squadron is operating at Al Asad Air Base today.”
Go C-130 – you will see action at some stage….
The first group of F-22 pilots direct from training are currently going through the course (Jan-Aug 2008).
AFAIK B-2 pilots still need a number of hours before converting to type.
I have 2022 for F/A-18C/D (looks about right). F-35C IOC is due 2015. The follow-on F/A-XX will either be manned or unmanned to replace the F/A-18E/F (decision due 2015 on mannned/unmanned for service entry 2025).
2015 for the AV-8B (doesn’t look right). F-35B IOC planned 2012, with FOC in 2024.
2025-30 for F-16C/D. Replacement F-35A is only planned as 80/year so last delivery planned 2034 (was 110/year till 2027) – IOC 2013.
The hanger deck on the Midways was lower than later super carriers. They could not remove the canopy to do ejection seat or extend the landing gear for maintenance purposes.
Vikings were never carried as they were never fitted with an ASW control centre.
Without the Hornet, the Midways would have been retired in the 1980s.
Sea Hawks replaced the Sea Kings in the 1990s.
Midways never carried Tomcats
Two possible reasons Boeing lost:
“Sources familiar with Boeing’s proposal say the team discounted the USAF’s desire to have a flexible tanker capable of hauling lots of cargo and passengers. And, Boeing Commercial Airplanes apparently fought hard not to release its parts pricing data when requested by the Air Force, prompting worries by the service about entering into a $35 billion relationship.”
Theres half a page on the Su-30MKI in the article…